Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zugravu, Nelu
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: fra
por
Título da fonte: Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/912
Resumo: Among the sources that reflect the transformations occurred in the imperial ideology during the 3rd-4th centuries, we find the speeches uttered between 289 and 389 in official and solemn circumstances by orators from Gallia (some of them anonymous), reunited since the Antiquity in the corpus entitled Panegyrici Latini. A special place in this respect is occupied by the divine nature of the emperor. The biography on the matter is rather consistent, but we may still add to the discussion an aspect that has not been approached thus far, and that I will approach in this paper, namely the relation between the princeps and the elements of nature. The analysis of the paragraphs concerning the control over the physical universe by the sovereigns allows the emphasis on aesthetical formulas through which the orators have accentuated certain defining elements of the ideology conveyed using their discourses – the cosmocratic rulership, exceptional civilian and military powers, legitimate election, the consensus between the Court and the provincial political circles. The sections of the paper are based on these aspects: 1. Maximianus – fortitudo; fortuna; felicitas; 2. Constantius and the providentia; 3. Constantine – utilitas publica; virtus; princeps salutaris; 4. Theodosius and the meritocratic principality.
id SBEC_4f29b56e8da12de8943ee2c7ab39960c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/912
network_acronym_str SBEC
network_name_str Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries)Tempestatis obsequium in principem : pouvoir cosmocratique et vertus de l’empereur dans les Panegyrici Latini (IIIe-IVe siècles)Panegyrici Latini idéologie impériale rapport souverain-nature vertus impériales légitimisme consensus politiquePanegyrici Latini imperial ideology relation between sovereign and nature imperial virtues legitimism political consensusAmong the sources that reflect the transformations occurred in the imperial ideology during the 3rd-4th centuries, we find the speeches uttered between 289 and 389 in official and solemn circumstances by orators from Gallia (some of them anonymous), reunited since the Antiquity in the corpus entitled Panegyrici Latini. A special place in this respect is occupied by the divine nature of the emperor. The biography on the matter is rather consistent, but we may still add to the discussion an aspect that has not been approached thus far, and that I will approach in this paper, namely the relation between the princeps and the elements of nature. The analysis of the paragraphs concerning the control over the physical universe by the sovereigns allows the emphasis on aesthetical formulas through which the orators have accentuated certain defining elements of the ideology conveyed using their discourses – the cosmocratic rulership, exceptional civilian and military powers, legitimate election, the consensus between the Court and the provincial political circles. The sections of the paper are based on these aspects: 1. Maximianus – fortitudo; fortuna; felicitas; 2. Constantius and the providentia; 3. Constantine – utilitas publica; virtus; princeps salutaris; 4. Theodosius and the meritocratic principality.Among the sources that reflect the transformations occurred in the imperial ideology during the 3rd-4th centuries, we find the speeches uttered between 289 and 389 in official and solemn circumstances by orators from Gallia (some of them anonymous), reunited since the Antiquity in the corpus entitled Panegyrici Latini. A special place in this respect is occupied by the divine nature of the emperor. The biography on the matter is rather consistent, but we may still add to the discussion an aspect that has not been approached thus far, and that I will approach in this paper, namely the relation between the princeps and the elements of nature. The analysis of the paragraphs concerning the control over the physical universe by the sovereigns allows the emphasis on aesthetical formulas through which the orators have accentuated certain defining elements of the ideology conveyed using their discourses – the cosmocratic rulership, exceptional civilian and military powers, legitimate election, the consensus between the Court and the provincial political circles. The sections of the paper are based on these aspects: 1. Maximianus – fortitudo; fortuna; felicitas; 2. Constantius and the providentia; 3. Constantine – utilitas publica; virtus; princeps salutaris; 4. Theodosius and the meritocratic principality.Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)2021-04-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/91210.24277/classica.v34i1.912Classica; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2021); 111-141Classica - Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos; v. 34 n. 1 (2021); 111-1412176-64360103-431610.24277/classica.v34i1reponame:Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)instacron:SBECfraporhttps://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/912/844https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/912/996Copyright (c) 2021 Nelu Zugravuhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZugravu, Nelu2022-06-21T18:12:56Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/912Revistahttps://revista.classica.org.br/classicaPUBhttps://revista.classica.org.br/classica/oaieditor@classica.org.br||revistaclassica@classica.org.br2176-64360103-4316opendoar:2022-06-21T18:12:56Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries)
Tempestatis obsequium in principem : pouvoir cosmocratique et vertus de l’empereur dans les Panegyrici Latini (IIIe-IVe siècles)
title Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries)
spellingShingle Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries)
Zugravu, Nelu
Panegyrici Latini
idéologie impériale
rapport souverain-nature
vertus impériales
légitimisme
consensus politique
Panegyrici Latini
imperial ideology
relation between sovereign and nature
imperial virtues
legitimism
political consensus
title_short Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries)
title_full Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries)
title_fullStr Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries)
title_full_unstemmed Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries)
title_sort Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries)
author Zugravu, Nelu
author_facet Zugravu, Nelu
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zugravu, Nelu
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Panegyrici Latini
idéologie impériale
rapport souverain-nature
vertus impériales
légitimisme
consensus politique
Panegyrici Latini
imperial ideology
relation between sovereign and nature
imperial virtues
legitimism
political consensus
topic Panegyrici Latini
idéologie impériale
rapport souverain-nature
vertus impériales
légitimisme
consensus politique
Panegyrici Latini
imperial ideology
relation between sovereign and nature
imperial virtues
legitimism
political consensus
description Among the sources that reflect the transformations occurred in the imperial ideology during the 3rd-4th centuries, we find the speeches uttered between 289 and 389 in official and solemn circumstances by orators from Gallia (some of them anonymous), reunited since the Antiquity in the corpus entitled Panegyrici Latini. A special place in this respect is occupied by the divine nature of the emperor. The biography on the matter is rather consistent, but we may still add to the discussion an aspect that has not been approached thus far, and that I will approach in this paper, namely the relation between the princeps and the elements of nature. The analysis of the paragraphs concerning the control over the physical universe by the sovereigns allows the emphasis on aesthetical formulas through which the orators have accentuated certain defining elements of the ideology conveyed using their discourses – the cosmocratic rulership, exceptional civilian and military powers, legitimate election, the consensus between the Court and the provincial political circles. The sections of the paper are based on these aspects: 1. Maximianus – fortitudo; fortuna; felicitas; 2. Constantius and the providentia; 3. Constantine – utilitas publica; virtus; princeps salutaris; 4. Theodosius and the meritocratic principality.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/912
10.24277/classica.v34i1.912
url https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/912
identifier_str_mv 10.24277/classica.v34i1.912
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv fra
por
language fra
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/912/844
https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/912/996
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Nelu Zugravu
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Nelu Zugravu
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Classica; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2021); 111-141
Classica - Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos; v. 34 n. 1 (2021); 111-141
2176-6436
0103-4316
10.24277/classica.v34i1
reponame:Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)
instacron:SBEC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)
instacron_str SBEC
institution SBEC
reponame_str Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online)
collection Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editor@classica.org.br||revistaclassica@classica.org.br
_version_ 1797239839895060480