Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | fra por |
Título da fonte: | Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/912 |
Resumo: | Among the sources that reflect the transformations occurred in the imperial ideology during the 3rd-4th centuries, we find the speeches uttered between 289 and 389 in official and solemn circumstances by orators from Gallia (some of them anonymous), reunited since the Antiquity in the corpus entitled Panegyrici Latini. A special place in this respect is occupied by the divine nature of the emperor. The biography on the matter is rather consistent, but we may still add to the discussion an aspect that has not been approached thus far, and that I will approach in this paper, namely the relation between the princeps and the elements of nature. The analysis of the paragraphs concerning the control over the physical universe by the sovereigns allows the emphasis on aesthetical formulas through which the orators have accentuated certain defining elements of the ideology conveyed using their discourses – the cosmocratic rulership, exceptional civilian and military powers, legitimate election, the consensus between the Court and the provincial political circles. The sections of the paper are based on these aspects: 1. Maximianus – fortitudo; fortuna; felicitas; 2. Constantius and the providentia; 3. Constantine – utilitas publica; virtus; princeps salutaris; 4. Theodosius and the meritocratic principality. |
id |
SBEC_4f29b56e8da12de8943ee2c7ab39960c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/912 |
network_acronym_str |
SBEC |
network_name_str |
Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries)Tempestatis obsequium in principem : pouvoir cosmocratique et vertus de l’empereur dans les Panegyrici Latini (IIIe-IVe siècles)Panegyrici Latini idéologie impériale rapport souverain-nature vertus impériales légitimisme consensus politiquePanegyrici Latini imperial ideology relation between sovereign and nature imperial virtues legitimism political consensusAmong the sources that reflect the transformations occurred in the imperial ideology during the 3rd-4th centuries, we find the speeches uttered between 289 and 389 in official and solemn circumstances by orators from Gallia (some of them anonymous), reunited since the Antiquity in the corpus entitled Panegyrici Latini. A special place in this respect is occupied by the divine nature of the emperor. The biography on the matter is rather consistent, but we may still add to the discussion an aspect that has not been approached thus far, and that I will approach in this paper, namely the relation between the princeps and the elements of nature. The analysis of the paragraphs concerning the control over the physical universe by the sovereigns allows the emphasis on aesthetical formulas through which the orators have accentuated certain defining elements of the ideology conveyed using their discourses – the cosmocratic rulership, exceptional civilian and military powers, legitimate election, the consensus between the Court and the provincial political circles. The sections of the paper are based on these aspects: 1. Maximianus – fortitudo; fortuna; felicitas; 2. Constantius and the providentia; 3. Constantine – utilitas publica; virtus; princeps salutaris; 4. Theodosius and the meritocratic principality.Among the sources that reflect the transformations occurred in the imperial ideology during the 3rd-4th centuries, we find the speeches uttered between 289 and 389 in official and solemn circumstances by orators from Gallia (some of them anonymous), reunited since the Antiquity in the corpus entitled Panegyrici Latini. A special place in this respect is occupied by the divine nature of the emperor. The biography on the matter is rather consistent, but we may still add to the discussion an aspect that has not been approached thus far, and that I will approach in this paper, namely the relation between the princeps and the elements of nature. The analysis of the paragraphs concerning the control over the physical universe by the sovereigns allows the emphasis on aesthetical formulas through which the orators have accentuated certain defining elements of the ideology conveyed using their discourses – the cosmocratic rulership, exceptional civilian and military powers, legitimate election, the consensus between the Court and the provincial political circles. The sections of the paper are based on these aspects: 1. Maximianus – fortitudo; fortuna; felicitas; 2. Constantius and the providentia; 3. Constantine – utilitas publica; virtus; princeps salutaris; 4. Theodosius and the meritocratic principality.Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)2021-04-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/91210.24277/classica.v34i1.912Classica; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2021); 111-141Classica - Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos; v. 34 n. 1 (2021); 111-1412176-64360103-431610.24277/classica.v34i1reponame:Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)instacron:SBECfraporhttps://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/912/844https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/912/996Copyright (c) 2021 Nelu Zugravuhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZugravu, Nelu2022-06-21T18:12:56Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/912Revistahttps://revista.classica.org.br/classicaPUBhttps://revista.classica.org.br/classica/oaieditor@classica.org.br||revistaclassica@classica.org.br2176-64360103-4316opendoar:2022-06-21T18:12:56Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries) Tempestatis obsequium in principem : pouvoir cosmocratique et vertus de l’empereur dans les Panegyrici Latini (IIIe-IVe siècles) |
title |
Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries) |
spellingShingle |
Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries) Zugravu, Nelu Panegyrici Latini idéologie impériale rapport souverain-nature vertus impériales légitimisme consensus politique Panegyrici Latini imperial ideology relation between sovereign and nature imperial virtues legitimism political consensus |
title_short |
Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries) |
title_full |
Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries) |
title_fullStr |
Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries) |
title_sort |
Tempestatis obsequium in principem: cosmocratic rulership and emperor’s virtues in Panegyrici Latini (3rd-4th centuries) |
author |
Zugravu, Nelu |
author_facet |
Zugravu, Nelu |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zugravu, Nelu |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Panegyrici Latini idéologie impériale rapport souverain-nature vertus impériales légitimisme consensus politique Panegyrici Latini imperial ideology relation between sovereign and nature imperial virtues legitimism political consensus |
topic |
Panegyrici Latini idéologie impériale rapport souverain-nature vertus impériales légitimisme consensus politique Panegyrici Latini imperial ideology relation between sovereign and nature imperial virtues legitimism political consensus |
description |
Among the sources that reflect the transformations occurred in the imperial ideology during the 3rd-4th centuries, we find the speeches uttered between 289 and 389 in official and solemn circumstances by orators from Gallia (some of them anonymous), reunited since the Antiquity in the corpus entitled Panegyrici Latini. A special place in this respect is occupied by the divine nature of the emperor. The biography on the matter is rather consistent, but we may still add to the discussion an aspect that has not been approached thus far, and that I will approach in this paper, namely the relation between the princeps and the elements of nature. The analysis of the paragraphs concerning the control over the physical universe by the sovereigns allows the emphasis on aesthetical formulas through which the orators have accentuated certain defining elements of the ideology conveyed using their discourses – the cosmocratic rulership, exceptional civilian and military powers, legitimate election, the consensus between the Court and the provincial political circles. The sections of the paper are based on these aspects: 1. Maximianus – fortitudo; fortuna; felicitas; 2. Constantius and the providentia; 3. Constantine – utilitas publica; virtus; princeps salutaris; 4. Theodosius and the meritocratic principality. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/912 10.24277/classica.v34i1.912 |
url |
https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/912 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.24277/classica.v34i1.912 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
fra por |
language |
fra por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/912/844 https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/912/996 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Nelu Zugravu http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Nelu Zugravu http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Classica; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2021); 111-141 Classica - Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos; v. 34 n. 1 (2021); 111-141 2176-6436 0103-4316 10.24277/classica.v34i1 reponame:Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC) instacron:SBEC |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC) |
instacron_str |
SBEC |
institution |
SBEC |
reponame_str |
Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) |
collection |
Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editor@classica.org.br||revistaclassica@classica.org.br |
_version_ |
1797239839895060480 |