Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Duarte, Claudio Walter Gomez
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/854
Resumo: Vitruvius attested in his treatise On Architecture that he learned his trade from the Greek masters. In book 4, he taught how an architect who wishes to build a Doric temple should proceed. He presents a scheme of rules based on the module, which shall be the measure that standardizes the entire building system. Assessing whether Greek temples really follow their principles has always been something that fascinated archaeologists, since the proportions are very controversial. We aim here to discuss the historical description of the Doric temple and to confront it with a sample of 63 buildings (6th-2nd century BC). For this, we have covered several passages of the treaty. The data reveal that in the sample we have several examples that meet Vitruvius’ recommendations; however, they do not apply to most cases. This was already expected, since it presents a rigid design scheme, and the treaty was written only at the end of the Roman Republic, ca. 27 BC.
id SBEC_93ca554687969cd40e6bee563b5f6fd9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/854
network_acronym_str SBEC
network_name_str Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidenceVitrúvio e o templo dórico grego : comparando a fonte textual e a evidência arqueológicaVitrúviotemplo dóricoarquitetura gregaproporçõesmódulosVitruvius Doric temple Greek architecture proportions modulesVitruvius attested in his treatise On Architecture that he learned his trade from the Greek masters. In book 4, he taught how an architect who wishes to build a Doric temple should proceed. He presents a scheme of rules based on the module, which shall be the measure that standardizes the entire building system. Assessing whether Greek temples really follow their principles has always been something that fascinated archaeologists, since the proportions are very controversial. We aim here to discuss the historical description of the Doric temple and to confront it with a sample of 63 buildings (6th-2nd century BC). For this, we have covered several passages of the treaty. The data reveal that in the sample we have several examples that meet Vitruvius’ recommendations; however, they do not apply to most cases. This was already expected, since it presents a rigid design scheme, and the treaty was written only at the end of the Roman Republic, ca. 27 BC.Vitrúvio atestou no seu tratado De Architectura que aprendeu o seu ofício com os mestres gregos. No livro 4, ensina como deve proceder um arquiteto que deseje construir um templo de ordem dórica. Ele apresenta um esquema de regras que tem como fundamento o módulo, e este deverá ser a medida que padroniza todo o sistema da edificação. Aferir se realmente os templos gregos seguem os seus princípios sempre foi algo que fascinou os arqueólogos, uma vez que as proporções são muito controversas. Objetivamos aqui discutir a descrição histórica do templo dórico e confrontá-la com uma amostra de 63 edifícios (séc. VI-II a.C.). Para isso, abordamos diversas passagens do tratado. Os dados revelam que na amostra temos vários exemplos que atendem às recomendações de Vitrúvio; contudo, esses não se aplicam à maioria dos casos. Isso já era esperado, uma vez que ele apresenta um esquema rígido de concepção, e o tratado foi escrito somente no final da República Romana, ca. 27 a.C.Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)2021-04-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/85410.24277/classica.v34i1.854Classica; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2021); 31-49Classica - Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos; v. 34 n. 1 (2021); 31-492176-64360103-431610.24277/classica.v34i1reponame:Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)instacron:SBECporhttps://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/854/841https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/854/1000Copyright (c) 2021 Claudio Walter Gomez Duartehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDuarte, Claudio Walter Gomez 2022-06-21T19:03:20Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/854Revistahttps://revista.classica.org.br/classicaPUBhttps://revista.classica.org.br/classica/oaieditor@classica.org.br||revistaclassica@classica.org.br2176-64360103-4316opendoar:2022-06-21T19:03:20Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence
Vitrúvio e o templo dórico grego : comparando a fonte textual e a evidência arqueológica
title Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence
spellingShingle Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence
Duarte, Claudio Walter Gomez
Vitrúvio
templo dórico
arquitetura grega
proporções
módulos
Vitruvius
Doric temple
Greek architecture
proportions
modules
title_short Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence
title_full Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence
title_fullStr Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence
title_full_unstemmed Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence
title_sort Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence
author Duarte, Claudio Walter Gomez
author_facet Duarte, Claudio Walter Gomez
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Duarte, Claudio Walter Gomez
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Vitrúvio
templo dórico
arquitetura grega
proporções
módulos
Vitruvius
Doric temple
Greek architecture
proportions
modules
topic Vitrúvio
templo dórico
arquitetura grega
proporções
módulos
Vitruvius
Doric temple
Greek architecture
proportions
modules
description Vitruvius attested in his treatise On Architecture that he learned his trade from the Greek masters. In book 4, he taught how an architect who wishes to build a Doric temple should proceed. He presents a scheme of rules based on the module, which shall be the measure that standardizes the entire building system. Assessing whether Greek temples really follow their principles has always been something that fascinated archaeologists, since the proportions are very controversial. We aim here to discuss the historical description of the Doric temple and to confront it with a sample of 63 buildings (6th-2nd century BC). For this, we have covered several passages of the treaty. The data reveal that in the sample we have several examples that meet Vitruvius’ recommendations; however, they do not apply to most cases. This was already expected, since it presents a rigid design scheme, and the treaty was written only at the end of the Roman Republic, ca. 27 BC.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/854
10.24277/classica.v34i1.854
url https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/854
identifier_str_mv 10.24277/classica.v34i1.854
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/854/841
https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/854/1000
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Claudio Walter Gomez Duarte
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Claudio Walter Gomez Duarte
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Classica; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2021); 31-49
Classica - Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos; v. 34 n. 1 (2021); 31-49
2176-6436
0103-4316
10.24277/classica.v34i1
reponame:Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)
instacron:SBEC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)
instacron_str SBEC
institution SBEC
reponame_str Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online)
collection Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editor@classica.org.br||revistaclassica@classica.org.br
_version_ 1797239839833194496