Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/854 |
Resumo: | Vitruvius attested in his treatise On Architecture that he learned his trade from the Greek masters. In book 4, he taught how an architect who wishes to build a Doric temple should proceed. He presents a scheme of rules based on the module, which shall be the measure that standardizes the entire building system. Assessing whether Greek temples really follow their principles has always been something that fascinated archaeologists, since the proportions are very controversial. We aim here to discuss the historical description of the Doric temple and to confront it with a sample of 63 buildings (6th-2nd century BC). For this, we have covered several passages of the treaty. The data reveal that in the sample we have several examples that meet Vitruvius’ recommendations; however, they do not apply to most cases. This was already expected, since it presents a rigid design scheme, and the treaty was written only at the end of the Roman Republic, ca. 27 BC. |
id |
SBEC_93ca554687969cd40e6bee563b5f6fd9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/854 |
network_acronym_str |
SBEC |
network_name_str |
Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidenceVitrúvio e o templo dórico grego : comparando a fonte textual e a evidência arqueológicaVitrúviotemplo dóricoarquitetura gregaproporçõesmódulosVitruvius Doric temple Greek architecture proportions modulesVitruvius attested in his treatise On Architecture that he learned his trade from the Greek masters. In book 4, he taught how an architect who wishes to build a Doric temple should proceed. He presents a scheme of rules based on the module, which shall be the measure that standardizes the entire building system. Assessing whether Greek temples really follow their principles has always been something that fascinated archaeologists, since the proportions are very controversial. We aim here to discuss the historical description of the Doric temple and to confront it with a sample of 63 buildings (6th-2nd century BC). For this, we have covered several passages of the treaty. The data reveal that in the sample we have several examples that meet Vitruvius’ recommendations; however, they do not apply to most cases. This was already expected, since it presents a rigid design scheme, and the treaty was written only at the end of the Roman Republic, ca. 27 BC.Vitrúvio atestou no seu tratado De Architectura que aprendeu o seu ofício com os mestres gregos. No livro 4, ensina como deve proceder um arquiteto que deseje construir um templo de ordem dórica. Ele apresenta um esquema de regras que tem como fundamento o módulo, e este deverá ser a medida que padroniza todo o sistema da edificação. Aferir se realmente os templos gregos seguem os seus princípios sempre foi algo que fascinou os arqueólogos, uma vez que as proporções são muito controversas. Objetivamos aqui discutir a descrição histórica do templo dórico e confrontá-la com uma amostra de 63 edifícios (séc. VI-II a.C.). Para isso, abordamos diversas passagens do tratado. Os dados revelam que na amostra temos vários exemplos que atendem às recomendações de Vitrúvio; contudo, esses não se aplicam à maioria dos casos. Isso já era esperado, uma vez que ele apresenta um esquema rígido de concepção, e o tratado foi escrito somente no final da República Romana, ca. 27 a.C.Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)2021-04-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/85410.24277/classica.v34i1.854Classica; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2021); 31-49Classica - Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos; v. 34 n. 1 (2021); 31-492176-64360103-431610.24277/classica.v34i1reponame:Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)instacron:SBECporhttps://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/854/841https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/854/1000Copyright (c) 2021 Claudio Walter Gomez Duartehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDuarte, Claudio Walter Gomez 2022-06-21T19:03:20Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/854Revistahttps://revista.classica.org.br/classicaPUBhttps://revista.classica.org.br/classica/oaieditor@classica.org.br||revistaclassica@classica.org.br2176-64360103-4316opendoar:2022-06-21T19:03:20Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence Vitrúvio e o templo dórico grego : comparando a fonte textual e a evidência arqueológica |
title |
Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence |
spellingShingle |
Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence Duarte, Claudio Walter Gomez Vitrúvio templo dórico arquitetura grega proporções módulos Vitruvius Doric temple Greek architecture proportions modules |
title_short |
Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence |
title_full |
Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence |
title_fullStr |
Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence |
title_full_unstemmed |
Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence |
title_sort |
Vitruvius and the Greek Doric temple: comparing the textual source and the archaeological evidence |
author |
Duarte, Claudio Walter Gomez |
author_facet |
Duarte, Claudio Walter Gomez |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Duarte, Claudio Walter Gomez |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Vitrúvio templo dórico arquitetura grega proporções módulos Vitruvius Doric temple Greek architecture proportions modules |
topic |
Vitrúvio templo dórico arquitetura grega proporções módulos Vitruvius Doric temple Greek architecture proportions modules |
description |
Vitruvius attested in his treatise On Architecture that he learned his trade from the Greek masters. In book 4, he taught how an architect who wishes to build a Doric temple should proceed. He presents a scheme of rules based on the module, which shall be the measure that standardizes the entire building system. Assessing whether Greek temples really follow their principles has always been something that fascinated archaeologists, since the proportions are very controversial. We aim here to discuss the historical description of the Doric temple and to confront it with a sample of 63 buildings (6th-2nd century BC). For this, we have covered several passages of the treaty. The data reveal that in the sample we have several examples that meet Vitruvius’ recommendations; however, they do not apply to most cases. This was already expected, since it presents a rigid design scheme, and the treaty was written only at the end of the Roman Republic, ca. 27 BC. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/854 10.24277/classica.v34i1.854 |
url |
https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/854 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.24277/classica.v34i1.854 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/854/841 https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/854/1000 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Claudio Walter Gomez Duarte http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Claudio Walter Gomez Duarte http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Classica; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2021); 31-49 Classica - Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos; v. 34 n. 1 (2021); 31-49 2176-6436 0103-4316 10.24277/classica.v34i1 reponame:Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC) instacron:SBEC |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC) |
instacron_str |
SBEC |
institution |
SBEC |
reponame_str |
Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) |
collection |
Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editor@classica.org.br||revistaclassica@classica.org.br |
_version_ |
1797239839833194496 |