Study of the effectiveness of interferential current as compared to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in reducing chronic low back pain

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dohnert,Marcelo Baptista
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Bauer,Jordana Peres, Pavão,Tiago Sebastiá
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Dor
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132015000100027
Resumo: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic low back pain has an incidence of 70% in general population and induces significant limitations. As treatment, physiotherapy stands out with a wide variety of techniques among them, for pain relief, electrotherapy is a useful tool. This study aimed at comparing the analgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential current in patients with chronic low back pain. METHODS: Randomized clinical trial carried out between August 2013 and May 2014 in the clinic school of physiotherapy, Ulbra-Torres, with chronic low back pain patients. Patients were divided in two groups: intervention group (IG) treated with interferential current and control group (CG) treated with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Visual analog scale, Oswestry Questionnaire and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire were used for baseline evaluation. Patients were treated for five weeks, twice a week, in a total of 10 interventions. At the end, they were re-evaluated and one month after they were submitted to follow-up with the visual analog scale. RESULTS: Participated in the study 28 patients, being 14 in IG and 14 in CG. Sample was homogeneous intragroups for gender, age, color and mean pain duration. There has been significant pain improvement in both groups by the visual analog scale and functionality improvement by Oswestry and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaires when comparing baseline and final evaluations (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: There were positive results in chronic low back pain improvement both with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential current, without significant difference between transcutaneous currents.
id SBED-1_ea426a0a3a48e21493476b50f9089910
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-00132015000100027
network_acronym_str SBED-1
network_name_str Revista Dor
repository_id_str
spelling Study of the effectiveness of interferential current as compared to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in reducing chronic low back painLow back painPhysiotherapyTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic low back pain has an incidence of 70% in general population and induces significant limitations. As treatment, physiotherapy stands out with a wide variety of techniques among them, for pain relief, electrotherapy is a useful tool. This study aimed at comparing the analgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential current in patients with chronic low back pain. METHODS: Randomized clinical trial carried out between August 2013 and May 2014 in the clinic school of physiotherapy, Ulbra-Torres, with chronic low back pain patients. Patients were divided in two groups: intervention group (IG) treated with interferential current and control group (CG) treated with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Visual analog scale, Oswestry Questionnaire and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire were used for baseline evaluation. Patients were treated for five weeks, twice a week, in a total of 10 interventions. At the end, they were re-evaluated and one month after they were submitted to follow-up with the visual analog scale. RESULTS: Participated in the study 28 patients, being 14 in IG and 14 in CG. Sample was homogeneous intragroups for gender, age, color and mean pain duration. There has been significant pain improvement in both groups by the visual analog scale and functionality improvement by Oswestry and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaires when comparing baseline and final evaluations (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: There were positive results in chronic low back pain improvement both with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential current, without significant difference between transcutaneous currents. Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor2015-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132015000100027Revista Dor v.16 n.1 2015reponame:Revista Dorinstname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)instacron:SBED10.5935/1806-0013.20150006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDohnert,Marcelo BaptistaBauer,Jordana PeresPavão,Tiago Sebastiáeng2015-08-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-00132015000100027Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rdor/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpdor@dor.org.br||dor@dor.org.br2317-63931806-0013opendoar:2015-08-04T00:00Revista Dor - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Study of the effectiveness of interferential current as compared to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in reducing chronic low back pain
title Study of the effectiveness of interferential current as compared to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in reducing chronic low back pain
spellingShingle Study of the effectiveness of interferential current as compared to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in reducing chronic low back pain
Dohnert,Marcelo Baptista
Low back pain
Physiotherapy
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
title_short Study of the effectiveness of interferential current as compared to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in reducing chronic low back pain
title_full Study of the effectiveness of interferential current as compared to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in reducing chronic low back pain
title_fullStr Study of the effectiveness of interferential current as compared to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in reducing chronic low back pain
title_full_unstemmed Study of the effectiveness of interferential current as compared to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in reducing chronic low back pain
title_sort Study of the effectiveness of interferential current as compared to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in reducing chronic low back pain
author Dohnert,Marcelo Baptista
author_facet Dohnert,Marcelo Baptista
Bauer,Jordana Peres
Pavão,Tiago Sebastiá
author_role author
author2 Bauer,Jordana Peres
Pavão,Tiago Sebastiá
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dohnert,Marcelo Baptista
Bauer,Jordana Peres
Pavão,Tiago Sebastiá
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Low back pain
Physiotherapy
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
topic Low back pain
Physiotherapy
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic low back pain has an incidence of 70% in general population and induces significant limitations. As treatment, physiotherapy stands out with a wide variety of techniques among them, for pain relief, electrotherapy is a useful tool. This study aimed at comparing the analgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential current in patients with chronic low back pain. METHODS: Randomized clinical trial carried out between August 2013 and May 2014 in the clinic school of physiotherapy, Ulbra-Torres, with chronic low back pain patients. Patients were divided in two groups: intervention group (IG) treated with interferential current and control group (CG) treated with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Visual analog scale, Oswestry Questionnaire and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire were used for baseline evaluation. Patients were treated for five weeks, twice a week, in a total of 10 interventions. At the end, they were re-evaluated and one month after they were submitted to follow-up with the visual analog scale. RESULTS: Participated in the study 28 patients, being 14 in IG and 14 in CG. Sample was homogeneous intragroups for gender, age, color and mean pain duration. There has been significant pain improvement in both groups by the visual analog scale and functionality improvement by Oswestry and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaires when comparing baseline and final evaluations (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: There were positive results in chronic low back pain improvement both with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential current, without significant difference between transcutaneous currents.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132015000100027
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132015000100027
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/1806-0013.20150006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Dor v.16 n.1 2015
reponame:Revista Dor
instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
instacron:SBED
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
instacron_str SBED
institution SBED
reponame_str Revista Dor
collection Revista Dor
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Dor - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dor@dor.org.br||dor@dor.org.br
_version_ 1752126254964801536