Evaluation of pain in vaginal and caesarean section birth newborns before and after intramuscular injection

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira,Esther Angélica Luiz
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Nassif,Damaris Souza, Silva,Matheus Jordão Danza, Barbosa,Silvia Maria de Macedo, Módolo,Norma Sueli Pinheiro, Barros,Guilherme Antônio Moreira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: BrJP (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922020000200123
Resumo: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is already known that the painful experiences to which the newborn is subjected may be related to future reactions and differences in the behavioral response to pain in newborns from different birth routes. This study aimed to evaluate the response to pain in infants born by cesarean section and vaginal delivery routes. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study. Newborns born at full term were allocated into two groups: cesarean section and vaginal delivery. The intramuscular vitamin K injection was performed as an acute pain stimulus because it is a routine injection at birth. The newborns were evaluated for pain on two scales, a one-dimensional, the Neonatal Facial Coding System, and a multidimensional, the COMFORT Behavior Scale (Comfort b), in addition to heart rate counting, moments before, immediately after and 10 minutes after the stimuli. Students t-test was used for statistical analyzes, and the level of significance was 5%. RESULTS: Eighty-three children were evaluated. The pain intensity assessed by both scales before the pain stimulus was higher in the cesarean section group, but not statistically significant. Heart rate values after the stimulus showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05), higher in the cesarean section group than in the vaginal delivery. CONCLUSION: The results did not suggest that there are differences in the perception of pain among newborns born vaginally and cesarean section.
id SBED-2_81d2a6bc3a1f3eada3be4d207aa82d5c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2595-31922020000200123
network_acronym_str SBED-2
network_name_str BrJP (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of pain in vaginal and caesarean section birth newborns before and after intramuscular injectionAcute painCesarean sectionNewbornObstetric deliveryABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is already known that the painful experiences to which the newborn is subjected may be related to future reactions and differences in the behavioral response to pain in newborns from different birth routes. This study aimed to evaluate the response to pain in infants born by cesarean section and vaginal delivery routes. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study. Newborns born at full term were allocated into two groups: cesarean section and vaginal delivery. The intramuscular vitamin K injection was performed as an acute pain stimulus because it is a routine injection at birth. The newborns were evaluated for pain on two scales, a one-dimensional, the Neonatal Facial Coding System, and a multidimensional, the COMFORT Behavior Scale (Comfort b), in addition to heart rate counting, moments before, immediately after and 10 minutes after the stimuli. Students t-test was used for statistical analyzes, and the level of significance was 5%. RESULTS: Eighty-three children were evaluated. The pain intensity assessed by both scales before the pain stimulus was higher in the cesarean section group, but not statistically significant. Heart rate values after the stimulus showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05), higher in the cesarean section group than in the vaginal delivery. CONCLUSION: The results did not suggest that there are differences in the perception of pain among newborns born vaginally and cesarean section.Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor2020-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922020000200123BrJP v.3 n.2 2020reponame:BrJP (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)instacron:SBED10.5935/2595-0118.20200021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira,Esther Angélica LuizNassif,Damaris SouzaSilva,Matheus Jordão DanzaBarbosa,Silvia Maria de MacedoMódolo,Norma Sueli PinheiroBarros,Guilherme Antônio Moreiraeng2020-06-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2595-31922020000200123Revistahttps://sbed.org.br/publicacoes-publicacoes-bjp/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpdkt@terra.com.br || dor@dor.org.br2595-31922595-0118opendoar:2020-06-29T00:00BrJP (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of pain in vaginal and caesarean section birth newborns before and after intramuscular injection
title Evaluation of pain in vaginal and caesarean section birth newborns before and after intramuscular injection
spellingShingle Evaluation of pain in vaginal and caesarean section birth newborns before and after intramuscular injection
Ferreira,Esther Angélica Luiz
Acute pain
Cesarean section
Newborn
Obstetric delivery
title_short Evaluation of pain in vaginal and caesarean section birth newborns before and after intramuscular injection
title_full Evaluation of pain in vaginal and caesarean section birth newborns before and after intramuscular injection
title_fullStr Evaluation of pain in vaginal and caesarean section birth newborns before and after intramuscular injection
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of pain in vaginal and caesarean section birth newborns before and after intramuscular injection
title_sort Evaluation of pain in vaginal and caesarean section birth newborns before and after intramuscular injection
author Ferreira,Esther Angélica Luiz
author_facet Ferreira,Esther Angélica Luiz
Nassif,Damaris Souza
Silva,Matheus Jordão Danza
Barbosa,Silvia Maria de Macedo
Módolo,Norma Sueli Pinheiro
Barros,Guilherme Antônio Moreira
author_role author
author2 Nassif,Damaris Souza
Silva,Matheus Jordão Danza
Barbosa,Silvia Maria de Macedo
Módolo,Norma Sueli Pinheiro
Barros,Guilherme Antônio Moreira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira,Esther Angélica Luiz
Nassif,Damaris Souza
Silva,Matheus Jordão Danza
Barbosa,Silvia Maria de Macedo
Módolo,Norma Sueli Pinheiro
Barros,Guilherme Antônio Moreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acute pain
Cesarean section
Newborn
Obstetric delivery
topic Acute pain
Cesarean section
Newborn
Obstetric delivery
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is already known that the painful experiences to which the newborn is subjected may be related to future reactions and differences in the behavioral response to pain in newborns from different birth routes. This study aimed to evaluate the response to pain in infants born by cesarean section and vaginal delivery routes. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study. Newborns born at full term were allocated into two groups: cesarean section and vaginal delivery. The intramuscular vitamin K injection was performed as an acute pain stimulus because it is a routine injection at birth. The newborns were evaluated for pain on two scales, a one-dimensional, the Neonatal Facial Coding System, and a multidimensional, the COMFORT Behavior Scale (Comfort b), in addition to heart rate counting, moments before, immediately after and 10 minutes after the stimuli. Students t-test was used for statistical analyzes, and the level of significance was 5%. RESULTS: Eighty-three children were evaluated. The pain intensity assessed by both scales before the pain stimulus was higher in the cesarean section group, but not statistically significant. Heart rate values after the stimulus showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05), higher in the cesarean section group than in the vaginal delivery. CONCLUSION: The results did not suggest that there are differences in the perception of pain among newborns born vaginally and cesarean section.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922020000200123
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922020000200123
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/2595-0118.20200021
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv BrJP v.3 n.2 2020
reponame:BrJP (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
instacron:SBED
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
instacron_str SBED
institution SBED
reponame_str BrJP (Online)
collection BrJP (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv BrJP (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dkt@terra.com.br || dor@dor.org.br
_version_ 1754732510290378752