Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Yurdakul,Ozan Volkan
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Kilicoglu,Mehmet Serkan, Bagcier,Fatih
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-39972021000100085
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: Internet usage for obtaining health-related information is widely popular among patients. However, there are still concerns about the reliability and comprehensibility of online information. The purpose of this study is to investigate the reliability and readability of osteoporosis-related websites. Materials and methods: On April 2, 2020, we searched the term “osteoporosis” on Google (https://www.google.com). We evaluated the first 200 uniform resource locators (URLs) in the query results regarding typology, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) scores, Health on the Net Foundation Code of conduct (HONcode) certification, Flesch–Kincaid Grade (FKG), and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) scores. The JAMA scoring system and HONcode stamp were used for assessing the reliability, whereas FKG and SMOG scores were used to assess the readability of online information. Results: Of the 151 analyzed websites, 57 (37.7%) were classified as highly reliable, and 19 (12.6%) were assigned with HONcode certification. The average FKG scores (8.81 ± 2.21) and SMOG scores (7.63 ± 1.81) were below the recommended grade, which is considered as easily readable. High reliable information was found to have higher readability scores, thereby representing the difficulty of readability. We observed a weak correlation between the increased reliability of information and decreased readability. Conclusion: Osteoporosis-related content on the internet generally has low reliability. High-reliable information is available online in scientific published materials, health portals, and news. Although the readability of the overall material is acceptable, the high-reliable websites still require high literacy and comprehension skills.
id SBEM-1_195b55d029f719421eb506d0214a8899
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2359-39972021000100085
network_acronym_str SBEM-1
network_name_str Arquivos de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosisOsteoporosisGoogleinternetweb pagesABSTRACT Objective: Internet usage for obtaining health-related information is widely popular among patients. However, there are still concerns about the reliability and comprehensibility of online information. The purpose of this study is to investigate the reliability and readability of osteoporosis-related websites. Materials and methods: On April 2, 2020, we searched the term “osteoporosis” on Google (https://www.google.com). We evaluated the first 200 uniform resource locators (URLs) in the query results regarding typology, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) scores, Health on the Net Foundation Code of conduct (HONcode) certification, Flesch–Kincaid Grade (FKG), and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) scores. The JAMA scoring system and HONcode stamp were used for assessing the reliability, whereas FKG and SMOG scores were used to assess the readability of online information. Results: Of the 151 analyzed websites, 57 (37.7%) were classified as highly reliable, and 19 (12.6%) were assigned with HONcode certification. The average FKG scores (8.81 ± 2.21) and SMOG scores (7.63 ± 1.81) were below the recommended grade, which is considered as easily readable. High reliable information was found to have higher readability scores, thereby representing the difficulty of readability. We observed a weak correlation between the increased reliability of information and decreased readability. Conclusion: Osteoporosis-related content on the internet generally has low reliability. High-reliable information is available online in scientific published materials, health portals, and news. Although the readability of the overall material is acceptable, the high-reliable websites still require high literacy and comprehension skills.Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia2021-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-39972021000100085Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism v.65 n.1 2021reponame:Arquivos de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)instacron:SBEM10.20945/2359-3997000000311info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessYurdakul,Ozan VolkanKilicoglu,Mehmet SerkanBagcier,Fatiheng2021-02-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2359-39972021000100085Revistahttps://www.aem-sbem.com/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||aem.editorial.office@endocrino.org.br2359-42922359-3997opendoar:2021-02-25T00:00Arquivos de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis
title Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis
spellingShingle Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis
Yurdakul,Ozan Volkan
Osteoporosis
Google
internet
web pages
title_short Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis
title_full Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis
title_fullStr Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis
title_sort Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis
author Yurdakul,Ozan Volkan
author_facet Yurdakul,Ozan Volkan
Kilicoglu,Mehmet Serkan
Bagcier,Fatih
author_role author
author2 Kilicoglu,Mehmet Serkan
Bagcier,Fatih
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Yurdakul,Ozan Volkan
Kilicoglu,Mehmet Serkan
Bagcier,Fatih
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Osteoporosis
Google
internet
web pages
topic Osteoporosis
Google
internet
web pages
description ABSTRACT Objective: Internet usage for obtaining health-related information is widely popular among patients. However, there are still concerns about the reliability and comprehensibility of online information. The purpose of this study is to investigate the reliability and readability of osteoporosis-related websites. Materials and methods: On April 2, 2020, we searched the term “osteoporosis” on Google (https://www.google.com). We evaluated the first 200 uniform resource locators (URLs) in the query results regarding typology, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) scores, Health on the Net Foundation Code of conduct (HONcode) certification, Flesch–Kincaid Grade (FKG), and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) scores. The JAMA scoring system and HONcode stamp were used for assessing the reliability, whereas FKG and SMOG scores were used to assess the readability of online information. Results: Of the 151 analyzed websites, 57 (37.7%) were classified as highly reliable, and 19 (12.6%) were assigned with HONcode certification. The average FKG scores (8.81 ± 2.21) and SMOG scores (7.63 ± 1.81) were below the recommended grade, which is considered as easily readable. High reliable information was found to have higher readability scores, thereby representing the difficulty of readability. We observed a weak correlation between the increased reliability of information and decreased readability. Conclusion: Osteoporosis-related content on the internet generally has low reliability. High-reliable information is available online in scientific published materials, health portals, and news. Although the readability of the overall material is acceptable, the high-reliable websites still require high literacy and comprehension skills.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-39972021000100085
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-39972021000100085
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.20945/2359-3997000000311
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism v.65 n.1 2021
reponame:Arquivos de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)
instacron:SBEM
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)
instacron_str SBEM
institution SBEM
reponame_str Arquivos de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo (Online)
collection Arquivos de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||aem.editorial.office@endocrino.org.br
_version_ 1752122517484470272