Thyroid nodules with highly suspicious ultrasonographic features, but with benign cytology on two occasions: is malignancy still possible?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rosário,Pedro Weslley
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Calsolari,Maria Regina
Tipo de documento: Relatório
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-39972016000400402
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective There is no information about the frequency of malignancy specifically in the case of thyroid nodules with highly suspicious sonographic features, but with two fine needle aspiration (FNA) showing benign cytology. This was the objective of the study. Subjects and methods We report the results of 105 patients with thyroid nodules considered “highly suspicious” according to the ultrasonographic classification of American Thyroid Association, in whom FNA revealed benign cytology on two occasions (interval of 6 months). Results Thyroidectomy was performed in 11 cases due to desire of the patient or significant growth of the nodule. In these patients, cytology continued to be benign in 9, was non-diagnostic in 1, and suspicious in 1. Histology revealed papillary carcinoma in only one nodule. In patients in whom a third FNA was obtained for this study (n = 94), cytology continued to be benign in 86, became non-diagnostic in 5, indeterminate in 2, and suspicious in 1. The last 8 patients (with non-benign cytology) were submitted to thyroidectomy and histology revealed malignancy in only one nodule. Conclusion The rate of malignancy found here for nodules with highly suspicious sonographic features, even after two FNA showing benign cytology, was 2%. We believe that in these cases, the continuation of follow-up consisting of ultrasound at intervals of 2 years may still be adequate.
id SBEM-1_edf46f11db4540d0416fdec71bc506bb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2359-39972016000400402
network_acronym_str SBEM-1
network_name_str Arquivos de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Thyroid nodules with highly suspicious ultrasonographic features, but with benign cytology on two occasions: is malignancy still possible?Thyroid nodulebenign cytologyultrasonographyABSTRACT Objective There is no information about the frequency of malignancy specifically in the case of thyroid nodules with highly suspicious sonographic features, but with two fine needle aspiration (FNA) showing benign cytology. This was the objective of the study. Subjects and methods We report the results of 105 patients with thyroid nodules considered “highly suspicious” according to the ultrasonographic classification of American Thyroid Association, in whom FNA revealed benign cytology on two occasions (interval of 6 months). Results Thyroidectomy was performed in 11 cases due to desire of the patient or significant growth of the nodule. In these patients, cytology continued to be benign in 9, was non-diagnostic in 1, and suspicious in 1. Histology revealed papillary carcinoma in only one nodule. In patients in whom a third FNA was obtained for this study (n = 94), cytology continued to be benign in 86, became non-diagnostic in 5, indeterminate in 2, and suspicious in 1. The last 8 patients (with non-benign cytology) were submitted to thyroidectomy and histology revealed malignancy in only one nodule. Conclusion The rate of malignancy found here for nodules with highly suspicious sonographic features, even after two FNA showing benign cytology, was 2%. We believe that in these cases, the continuation of follow-up consisting of ultrasound at intervals of 2 years may still be adequate.Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/reportinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-39972016000400402Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism v.60 n.4 2016reponame:Arquivos de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)instacron:SBEM10.1590/2359-3997000000176info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRosário,Pedro WeslleyCalsolari,Maria Reginaeng2016-08-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2359-39972016000400402Revistahttps://www.aem-sbem.com/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||aem.editorial.office@endocrino.org.br2359-42922359-3997opendoar:2016-08-12T00:00Arquivos de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Thyroid nodules with highly suspicious ultrasonographic features, but with benign cytology on two occasions: is malignancy still possible?
title Thyroid nodules with highly suspicious ultrasonographic features, but with benign cytology on two occasions: is malignancy still possible?
spellingShingle Thyroid nodules with highly suspicious ultrasonographic features, but with benign cytology on two occasions: is malignancy still possible?
Rosário,Pedro Weslley
Thyroid nodule
benign cytology
ultrasonography
title_short Thyroid nodules with highly suspicious ultrasonographic features, but with benign cytology on two occasions: is malignancy still possible?
title_full Thyroid nodules with highly suspicious ultrasonographic features, but with benign cytology on two occasions: is malignancy still possible?
title_fullStr Thyroid nodules with highly suspicious ultrasonographic features, but with benign cytology on two occasions: is malignancy still possible?
title_full_unstemmed Thyroid nodules with highly suspicious ultrasonographic features, but with benign cytology on two occasions: is malignancy still possible?
title_sort Thyroid nodules with highly suspicious ultrasonographic features, but with benign cytology on two occasions: is malignancy still possible?
author Rosário,Pedro Weslley
author_facet Rosário,Pedro Weslley
Calsolari,Maria Regina
author_role author
author2 Calsolari,Maria Regina
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rosário,Pedro Weslley
Calsolari,Maria Regina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Thyroid nodule
benign cytology
ultrasonography
topic Thyroid nodule
benign cytology
ultrasonography
description ABSTRACT Objective There is no information about the frequency of malignancy specifically in the case of thyroid nodules with highly suspicious sonographic features, but with two fine needle aspiration (FNA) showing benign cytology. This was the objective of the study. Subjects and methods We report the results of 105 patients with thyroid nodules considered “highly suspicious” according to the ultrasonographic classification of American Thyroid Association, in whom FNA revealed benign cytology on two occasions (interval of 6 months). Results Thyroidectomy was performed in 11 cases due to desire of the patient or significant growth of the nodule. In these patients, cytology continued to be benign in 9, was non-diagnostic in 1, and suspicious in 1. Histology revealed papillary carcinoma in only one nodule. In patients in whom a third FNA was obtained for this study (n = 94), cytology continued to be benign in 86, became non-diagnostic in 5, indeterminate in 2, and suspicious in 1. The last 8 patients (with non-benign cytology) were submitted to thyroidectomy and histology revealed malignancy in only one nodule. Conclusion The rate of malignancy found here for nodules with highly suspicious sonographic features, even after two FNA showing benign cytology, was 2%. We believe that in these cases, the continuation of follow-up consisting of ultrasound at intervals of 2 years may still be adequate.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/report
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format report
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-39972016000400402
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-39972016000400402
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2359-3997000000176
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism v.60 n.4 2016
reponame:Arquivos de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)
instacron:SBEM
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)
instacron_str SBEM
institution SBEM
reponame_str Arquivos de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo (Online)
collection Arquivos de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||aem.editorial.office@endocrino.org.br
_version_ 1752122513976983552