Ultrasonographic characteristics as a criterion for repeat cytology in benign thyroid nodules

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rosário,Pedro Weslley
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Purisch,Saulo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302010000100009
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To report the results of repeat fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in thyroid nodules with an initial benign cytological diagnosis that grow during follow-up and/or present suspicious ultrasonographic characteristics. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 456 patients with 895 nodules. FNAC was repeated after 12 to 18 months in the case of nodules with suspicious ultrasonographic characteristics, irrespective of growth, and when the nodules showed significant growth. RESULTS: Among the 895 nodules examined, 102 (11.4%) presented suspicious ultrasonographic characteristics. The second FNAC revealed malignancy in 18 (17.6%) nodules, including 20% (2/10) of those showing growth and 17.4% (16/92) that did not. Seventy-six (9.6%) of 793 nodules without suspicious characteristics presented growth. Only one case (1.3%) of malignancy was diagnosed by repeat FNAC. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests ultrasonographic characteristics rather than growth as a criterion for repeat FNAC in the case of nodules with an initial benign cytological diagnosis.
id SBEM-2_2f6101b2ccc46db2584accb0180135ab
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0004-27302010000100009
network_acronym_str SBEM-2
network_name_str Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Ultrasonographic characteristics as a criterion for repeat cytology in benign thyroid nodulesThyroid nodulecytologyultrasonographygrowthOBJECTIVE: To report the results of repeat fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in thyroid nodules with an initial benign cytological diagnosis that grow during follow-up and/or present suspicious ultrasonographic characteristics. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 456 patients with 895 nodules. FNAC was repeated after 12 to 18 months in the case of nodules with suspicious ultrasonographic characteristics, irrespective of growth, and when the nodules showed significant growth. RESULTS: Among the 895 nodules examined, 102 (11.4%) presented suspicious ultrasonographic characteristics. The second FNAC revealed malignancy in 18 (17.6%) nodules, including 20% (2/10) of those showing growth and 17.4% (16/92) that did not. Seventy-six (9.6%) of 793 nodules without suspicious characteristics presented growth. Only one case (1.3%) of malignancy was diagnosed by repeat FNAC. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests ultrasonographic characteristics rather than growth as a criterion for repeat FNAC in the case of nodules with an initial benign cytological diagnosis.Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia2010-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302010000100009Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia v.54 n.1 2010reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)instacron:SBEM10.1590/S0004-27302010000100009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRosário,Pedro WeslleyPurisch,Sauloeng2010-04-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-27302010000100009Revistahttps://www.aem-sbem.com/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||abem-editoria@endocrino.org.br1677-94870004-2730opendoar:2010-04-07T00:00Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ultrasonographic characteristics as a criterion for repeat cytology in benign thyroid nodules
title Ultrasonographic characteristics as a criterion for repeat cytology in benign thyroid nodules
spellingShingle Ultrasonographic characteristics as a criterion for repeat cytology in benign thyroid nodules
Rosário,Pedro Weslley
Thyroid nodule
cytology
ultrasonography
growth
title_short Ultrasonographic characteristics as a criterion for repeat cytology in benign thyroid nodules
title_full Ultrasonographic characteristics as a criterion for repeat cytology in benign thyroid nodules
title_fullStr Ultrasonographic characteristics as a criterion for repeat cytology in benign thyroid nodules
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasonographic characteristics as a criterion for repeat cytology in benign thyroid nodules
title_sort Ultrasonographic characteristics as a criterion for repeat cytology in benign thyroid nodules
author Rosário,Pedro Weslley
author_facet Rosário,Pedro Weslley
Purisch,Saulo
author_role author
author2 Purisch,Saulo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rosário,Pedro Weslley
Purisch,Saulo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Thyroid nodule
cytology
ultrasonography
growth
topic Thyroid nodule
cytology
ultrasonography
growth
description OBJECTIVE: To report the results of repeat fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in thyroid nodules with an initial benign cytological diagnosis that grow during follow-up and/or present suspicious ultrasonographic characteristics. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 456 patients with 895 nodules. FNAC was repeated after 12 to 18 months in the case of nodules with suspicious ultrasonographic characteristics, irrespective of growth, and when the nodules showed significant growth. RESULTS: Among the 895 nodules examined, 102 (11.4%) presented suspicious ultrasonographic characteristics. The second FNAC revealed malignancy in 18 (17.6%) nodules, including 20% (2/10) of those showing growth and 17.4% (16/92) that did not. Seventy-six (9.6%) of 793 nodules without suspicious characteristics presented growth. Only one case (1.3%) of malignancy was diagnosed by repeat FNAC. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests ultrasonographic characteristics rather than growth as a criterion for repeat FNAC in the case of nodules with an initial benign cytological diagnosis.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302010000100009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302010000100009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0004-27302010000100009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia v.54 n.1 2010
reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)
instacron:SBEM
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)
instacron_str SBEM
institution SBEM
reponame_str Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online)
collection Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||abem-editoria@endocrino.org.br
_version_ 1754734810907017216