Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Andréia Regina O. da
Data de Publicação: 2003
Outros Autores: Aguiar,Danilo R. D., Lima,João Eustáquio de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-20032003000200004
Resumo: This article analyzes the effectiveness of hedging Brazilian soy oil, soy meal, and soybeans in the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) and in the Brazilian Commodities and Futures Exchange (BM&F) to reduce the risk of financial loss due to commodity price fluctuations. The econometric results show that a cross-hedging strategy using the BM&F soybean futures contract is an instrument of low effectiveness for managing soy oil and soy meal price risk. Despite low effectiveness, the estimates demonstrate total advantage for soy meal hedging operations using CBOT soy meal futures contracts rather than cross-hedging using BM&F soybean futures contracts. With some exceptions, the results are also more favorable for hedging soy oil with soy oil futures contracts at the CBOT rather than cross hedging with soybeans at the BM&F. Conversely, Brazilian traders hedging soybeans receive more effective risk protection by trading soybean futures contracts at the BM&F than by trading soybean futures contracts at the CBOT.
id SBESR-1_ea0f1cbee800cc57e4fa41aed93fa2a0
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-20032003000200004
network_acronym_str SBESR-1
network_name_str Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
repository_id_str
spelling Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOTcross-hedgingsoybean industryhedging effectivenessThis article analyzes the effectiveness of hedging Brazilian soy oil, soy meal, and soybeans in the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) and in the Brazilian Commodities and Futures Exchange (BM&F) to reduce the risk of financial loss due to commodity price fluctuations. The econometric results show that a cross-hedging strategy using the BM&F soybean futures contract is an instrument of low effectiveness for managing soy oil and soy meal price risk. Despite low effectiveness, the estimates demonstrate total advantage for soy meal hedging operations using CBOT soy meal futures contracts rather than cross-hedging using BM&F soybean futures contracts. With some exceptions, the results are also more favorable for hedging soy oil with soy oil futures contracts at the CBOT rather than cross hedging with soybeans at the BM&F. Conversely, Brazilian traders hedging soybeans receive more effective risk protection by trading soybean futures contracts at the BM&F than by trading soybean futures contracts at the CBOT.Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural2003-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-20032003000200004Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural v.41 n.2 2003reponame:Revista de Economia e Sociologia Ruralinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural (SBESR)instacron:SBESR10.1590/S0103-20032003000200004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Andréia Regina O. daAguiar,Danilo R. D.Lima,João Eustáquio deeng2019-06-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-20032003000200004Revistahttps://www.revistasober.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsober@sober.org.br||resr@revistasober.org1806-94790103-2003opendoar:2019-06-07T00:00Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural - Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural (SBESR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT
title Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT
spellingShingle Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT
Silva,Andréia Regina O. da
cross-hedging
soybean industry
hedging effectiveness
title_short Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT
title_full Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT
title_fullStr Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT
title_full_unstemmed Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT
title_sort Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT
author Silva,Andréia Regina O. da
author_facet Silva,Andréia Regina O. da
Aguiar,Danilo R. D.
Lima,João Eustáquio de
author_role author
author2 Aguiar,Danilo R. D.
Lima,João Eustáquio de
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Andréia Regina O. da
Aguiar,Danilo R. D.
Lima,João Eustáquio de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv cross-hedging
soybean industry
hedging effectiveness
topic cross-hedging
soybean industry
hedging effectiveness
description This article analyzes the effectiveness of hedging Brazilian soy oil, soy meal, and soybeans in the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) and in the Brazilian Commodities and Futures Exchange (BM&F) to reduce the risk of financial loss due to commodity price fluctuations. The econometric results show that a cross-hedging strategy using the BM&F soybean futures contract is an instrument of low effectiveness for managing soy oil and soy meal price risk. Despite low effectiveness, the estimates demonstrate total advantage for soy meal hedging operations using CBOT soy meal futures contracts rather than cross-hedging using BM&F soybean futures contracts. With some exceptions, the results are also more favorable for hedging soy oil with soy oil futures contracts at the CBOT rather than cross hedging with soybeans at the BM&F. Conversely, Brazilian traders hedging soybeans receive more effective risk protection by trading soybean futures contracts at the BM&F than by trading soybean futures contracts at the CBOT.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-20032003000200004
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-20032003000200004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-20032003000200004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural v.41 n.2 2003
reponame:Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural (SBESR)
instacron:SBESR
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural (SBESR)
instacron_str SBESR
institution SBESR
reponame_str Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
collection Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural - Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural (SBESR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sober@sober.org.br||resr@revistasober.org
_version_ 1752122555270955008