Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2003 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-20032003000200004 |
Resumo: | This article analyzes the effectiveness of hedging Brazilian soy oil, soy meal, and soybeans in the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) and in the Brazilian Commodities and Futures Exchange (BM&F) to reduce the risk of financial loss due to commodity price fluctuations. The econometric results show that a cross-hedging strategy using the BM&F soybean futures contract is an instrument of low effectiveness for managing soy oil and soy meal price risk. Despite low effectiveness, the estimates demonstrate total advantage for soy meal hedging operations using CBOT soy meal futures contracts rather than cross-hedging using BM&F soybean futures contracts. With some exceptions, the results are also more favorable for hedging soy oil with soy oil futures contracts at the CBOT rather than cross hedging with soybeans at the BM&F. Conversely, Brazilian traders hedging soybeans receive more effective risk protection by trading soybean futures contracts at the BM&F than by trading soybean futures contracts at the CBOT. |
id |
SBESR-1_ea0f1cbee800cc57e4fa41aed93fa2a0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-20032003000200004 |
network_acronym_str |
SBESR-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOTcross-hedgingsoybean industryhedging effectivenessThis article analyzes the effectiveness of hedging Brazilian soy oil, soy meal, and soybeans in the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) and in the Brazilian Commodities and Futures Exchange (BM&F) to reduce the risk of financial loss due to commodity price fluctuations. The econometric results show that a cross-hedging strategy using the BM&F soybean futures contract is an instrument of low effectiveness for managing soy oil and soy meal price risk. Despite low effectiveness, the estimates demonstrate total advantage for soy meal hedging operations using CBOT soy meal futures contracts rather than cross-hedging using BM&F soybean futures contracts. With some exceptions, the results are also more favorable for hedging soy oil with soy oil futures contracts at the CBOT rather than cross hedging with soybeans at the BM&F. Conversely, Brazilian traders hedging soybeans receive more effective risk protection by trading soybean futures contracts at the BM&F than by trading soybean futures contracts at the CBOT.Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural2003-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-20032003000200004Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural v.41 n.2 2003reponame:Revista de Economia e Sociologia Ruralinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural (SBESR)instacron:SBESR10.1590/S0103-20032003000200004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Andréia Regina O. daAguiar,Danilo R. D.Lima,João Eustáquio deeng2019-06-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-20032003000200004Revistahttps://www.revistasober.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsober@sober.org.br||resr@revistasober.org1806-94790103-2003opendoar:2019-06-07T00:00Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural - Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural (SBESR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT |
title |
Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT |
spellingShingle |
Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT Silva,Andréia Regina O. da cross-hedging soybean industry hedging effectiveness |
title_short |
Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT |
title_full |
Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT |
title_fullStr |
Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT |
title_sort |
Hedging with futures contracts in the Brazilian soybean complex: : BM&F vs. CBOT |
author |
Silva,Andréia Regina O. da |
author_facet |
Silva,Andréia Regina O. da Aguiar,Danilo R. D. Lima,João Eustáquio de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Aguiar,Danilo R. D. Lima,João Eustáquio de |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva,Andréia Regina O. da Aguiar,Danilo R. D. Lima,João Eustáquio de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
cross-hedging soybean industry hedging effectiveness |
topic |
cross-hedging soybean industry hedging effectiveness |
description |
This article analyzes the effectiveness of hedging Brazilian soy oil, soy meal, and soybeans in the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) and in the Brazilian Commodities and Futures Exchange (BM&F) to reduce the risk of financial loss due to commodity price fluctuations. The econometric results show that a cross-hedging strategy using the BM&F soybean futures contract is an instrument of low effectiveness for managing soy oil and soy meal price risk. Despite low effectiveness, the estimates demonstrate total advantage for soy meal hedging operations using CBOT soy meal futures contracts rather than cross-hedging using BM&F soybean futures contracts. With some exceptions, the results are also more favorable for hedging soy oil with soy oil futures contracts at the CBOT rather than cross hedging with soybeans at the BM&F. Conversely, Brazilian traders hedging soybeans receive more effective risk protection by trading soybean futures contracts at the BM&F than by trading soybean futures contracts at the CBOT. |
publishDate |
2003 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2003-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-20032003000200004 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-20032003000200004 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0103-20032003000200004 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural v.41 n.2 2003 reponame:Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural (SBESR) instacron:SBESR |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural (SBESR) |
instacron_str |
SBESR |
institution |
SBESR |
reponame_str |
Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural |
collection |
Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural - Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural (SBESR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sober@sober.org.br||resr@revistasober.org |
_version_ |
1752122555270955008 |