Quantitative analysis of two important epidemiological features of the common bean: Phaeoisariopsis griseola pathosystem
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2004 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Fitopatologia Brasileira |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-41582004000600015 |
Resumo: | This work quantifies two important epidemiological features of the bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)/Phaeoisariopsis griseola pathosystem. The first is the effect of the number of nights of leaf wetness on infection efficiency. Infection efficiency was below 10% when inoculated leaflets were exposed to less than two nights of leaf wetness. Optimum infection efficiencies were obtained after three to four nights of leaf wetness, at about 50%. Further nights of leaf wetness did not increase the infection efficiency. The second feature quantified is the relative rate of leaflet defoliation for varying levels of angular leaf spot severity. It increased with disease severity according to a logarithm-like curve, and a relative rate of 0.23 day-1 was estimated for a severity of 18%. The implications of these results on the disease epidemiology are discussed. |
id |
SBF-3_c6a423c2782ed2ec744fb429e9d4a06a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-41582004000600015 |
network_acronym_str |
SBF-3 |
network_name_str |
Fitopatologia Brasileira |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Quantitative analysis of two important epidemiological features of the common bean: Phaeoisariopsis griseola pathosystemepidemiologyangular leaf spotPhaseolus vulgarisinfection efficiencydefoliationleaf wetnessmonocycle processThis work quantifies two important epidemiological features of the bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)/Phaeoisariopsis griseola pathosystem. The first is the effect of the number of nights of leaf wetness on infection efficiency. Infection efficiency was below 10% when inoculated leaflets were exposed to less than two nights of leaf wetness. Optimum infection efficiencies were obtained after three to four nights of leaf wetness, at about 50%. Further nights of leaf wetness did not increase the infection efficiency. The second feature quantified is the relative rate of leaflet defoliation for varying levels of angular leaf spot severity. It increased with disease severity according to a logarithm-like curve, and a relative rate of 0.23 day-1 was estimated for a severity of 18%. The implications of these results on the disease epidemiology are discussed.Sociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia2004-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-41582004000600015Fitopatologia Brasileira v.29 n.6 2004reponame:Fitopatologia Brasileirainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia (SBF)instacron:SBF10.1590/S0100-41582004000600015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWillocquet,LaetitiaAllorent,DelphineSavary,Sergeeng2005-01-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-41582004000600015Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/fbONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbf-revista@ufla.br1678-46770100-4158opendoar:2005-01-06T00:00Fitopatologia Brasileira - Sociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia (SBF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quantitative analysis of two important epidemiological features of the common bean: Phaeoisariopsis griseola pathosystem |
title |
Quantitative analysis of two important epidemiological features of the common bean: Phaeoisariopsis griseola pathosystem |
spellingShingle |
Quantitative analysis of two important epidemiological features of the common bean: Phaeoisariopsis griseola pathosystem Willocquet,Laetitia epidemiology angular leaf spot Phaseolus vulgaris infection efficiency defoliation leaf wetness monocycle process |
title_short |
Quantitative analysis of two important epidemiological features of the common bean: Phaeoisariopsis griseola pathosystem |
title_full |
Quantitative analysis of two important epidemiological features of the common bean: Phaeoisariopsis griseola pathosystem |
title_fullStr |
Quantitative analysis of two important epidemiological features of the common bean: Phaeoisariopsis griseola pathosystem |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quantitative analysis of two important epidemiological features of the common bean: Phaeoisariopsis griseola pathosystem |
title_sort |
Quantitative analysis of two important epidemiological features of the common bean: Phaeoisariopsis griseola pathosystem |
author |
Willocquet,Laetitia |
author_facet |
Willocquet,Laetitia Allorent,Delphine Savary,Serge |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Allorent,Delphine Savary,Serge |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Willocquet,Laetitia Allorent,Delphine Savary,Serge |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
epidemiology angular leaf spot Phaseolus vulgaris infection efficiency defoliation leaf wetness monocycle process |
topic |
epidemiology angular leaf spot Phaseolus vulgaris infection efficiency defoliation leaf wetness monocycle process |
description |
This work quantifies two important epidemiological features of the bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)/Phaeoisariopsis griseola pathosystem. The first is the effect of the number of nights of leaf wetness on infection efficiency. Infection efficiency was below 10% when inoculated leaflets were exposed to less than two nights of leaf wetness. Optimum infection efficiencies were obtained after three to four nights of leaf wetness, at about 50%. Further nights of leaf wetness did not increase the infection efficiency. The second feature quantified is the relative rate of leaflet defoliation for varying levels of angular leaf spot severity. It increased with disease severity according to a logarithm-like curve, and a relative rate of 0.23 day-1 was estimated for a severity of 18%. The implications of these results on the disease epidemiology are discussed. |
publishDate |
2004 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2004-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-41582004000600015 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-41582004000600015 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0100-41582004000600015 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fitopatologia Brasileira v.29 n.6 2004 reponame:Fitopatologia Brasileira instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia (SBF) instacron:SBF |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia (SBF) |
instacron_str |
SBF |
institution |
SBF |
reponame_str |
Fitopatologia Brasileira |
collection |
Fitopatologia Brasileira |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fitopatologia Brasileira - Sociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia (SBF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sbf-revista@ufla.br |
_version_ |
1754734649913901056 |