Psychometric equivalence of the Brazilian version of the Test of Pragmatic Language 2 - TOPL-2

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho,Carolina Alves Ferreira de
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Lúcio,Patrícia Silva, Ávila,Clara Regina Brandão de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: CoDAS
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822015000400344
Resumo: INTRODUCTION: Considering the relevance of the investigation about the pragmatic function for language disorders diagnosis, as well as the relevance of validity evidence for test interpretation, this paper aimed to explore the psychometric equivalence between the American and Brazilian versions of the Test of Pragmatic Language, Second Edition (TOPL-2).METHODS: A total of 81 students from the third to seventh year from public elementary schools of São Paulo (63% girls; average age=9.42 years, SD=0.93) with no complaints or indicators of low school performance were selected. Students answered the verbal application of the TOPL-2 Brazilian-Portuguese version. Some of the psychometric inquiries reported in the original version of the test were reproduced focusing on the analyses of difficulty, internal consistency, discrimination, and differential item functioning.RESULTS: Most of the items (86%) presented similar difficulties to the American version. The internal consistency index had acceptable values (0.70). Few items (26%) showed adequate discrimination, but 49% were close to the desirable cutoffs. Eight items showed differential functioning; of which, five were favorable to boys.CONCLUSION: Despite sample limitations related to size and variability, almost half of the items showed psychometric equivalence to the American version.
id SBFA-1_306189d9981a9eac21400ca59c4ca039
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2317-17822015000400344
network_acronym_str SBFA-1
network_name_str CoDAS
repository_id_str
spelling Psychometric equivalence of the Brazilian version of the Test of Pragmatic Language 2 - TOPL-2Language TestsPsychometricsDifficultyDiscriminationSpeech, Language and Hearing SciencesINTRODUCTION: Considering the relevance of the investigation about the pragmatic function for language disorders diagnosis, as well as the relevance of validity evidence for test interpretation, this paper aimed to explore the psychometric equivalence between the American and Brazilian versions of the Test of Pragmatic Language, Second Edition (TOPL-2).METHODS: A total of 81 students from the third to seventh year from public elementary schools of São Paulo (63% girls; average age=9.42 years, SD=0.93) with no complaints or indicators of low school performance were selected. Students answered the verbal application of the TOPL-2 Brazilian-Portuguese version. Some of the psychometric inquiries reported in the original version of the test were reproduced focusing on the analyses of difficulty, internal consistency, discrimination, and differential item functioning.RESULTS: Most of the items (86%) presented similar difficulties to the American version. The internal consistency index had acceptable values (0.70). Few items (26%) showed adequate discrimination, but 49% were close to the desirable cutoffs. Eight items showed differential functioning; of which, five were favorable to boys.CONCLUSION: Despite sample limitations related to size and variability, almost half of the items showed psychometric equivalence to the American version.Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia2015-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822015000400344CoDAS v.27 n.4 2015reponame:CoDASinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)instacron:SBFA10.1590/2317-1782/20152013032info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho,Carolina Alves Ferreira deLúcio,Patrícia SilvaÁvila,Clara Regina Brandão deeng2015-09-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2317-17822015000400344Revistahttps://www.codas.org.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcodas@editoracubo.com.br||revista@codas.org.br2317-17822317-1782opendoar:2015-09-17T00:00CoDAS - Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Psychometric equivalence of the Brazilian version of the Test of Pragmatic Language 2 - TOPL-2
title Psychometric equivalence of the Brazilian version of the Test of Pragmatic Language 2 - TOPL-2
spellingShingle Psychometric equivalence of the Brazilian version of the Test of Pragmatic Language 2 - TOPL-2
Carvalho,Carolina Alves Ferreira de
Language Tests
Psychometrics
Difficulty
Discrimination
Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences
title_short Psychometric equivalence of the Brazilian version of the Test of Pragmatic Language 2 - TOPL-2
title_full Psychometric equivalence of the Brazilian version of the Test of Pragmatic Language 2 - TOPL-2
title_fullStr Psychometric equivalence of the Brazilian version of the Test of Pragmatic Language 2 - TOPL-2
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric equivalence of the Brazilian version of the Test of Pragmatic Language 2 - TOPL-2
title_sort Psychometric equivalence of the Brazilian version of the Test of Pragmatic Language 2 - TOPL-2
author Carvalho,Carolina Alves Ferreira de
author_facet Carvalho,Carolina Alves Ferreira de
Lúcio,Patrícia Silva
Ávila,Clara Regina Brandão de
author_role author
author2 Lúcio,Patrícia Silva
Ávila,Clara Regina Brandão de
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho,Carolina Alves Ferreira de
Lúcio,Patrícia Silva
Ávila,Clara Regina Brandão de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Language Tests
Psychometrics
Difficulty
Discrimination
Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences
topic Language Tests
Psychometrics
Difficulty
Discrimination
Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences
description INTRODUCTION: Considering the relevance of the investigation about the pragmatic function for language disorders diagnosis, as well as the relevance of validity evidence for test interpretation, this paper aimed to explore the psychometric equivalence between the American and Brazilian versions of the Test of Pragmatic Language, Second Edition (TOPL-2).METHODS: A total of 81 students from the third to seventh year from public elementary schools of São Paulo (63% girls; average age=9.42 years, SD=0.93) with no complaints or indicators of low school performance were selected. Students answered the verbal application of the TOPL-2 Brazilian-Portuguese version. Some of the psychometric inquiries reported in the original version of the test were reproduced focusing on the analyses of difficulty, internal consistency, discrimination, and differential item functioning.RESULTS: Most of the items (86%) presented similar difficulties to the American version. The internal consistency index had acceptable values (0.70). Few items (26%) showed adequate discrimination, but 49% were close to the desirable cutoffs. Eight items showed differential functioning; of which, five were favorable to boys.CONCLUSION: Despite sample limitations related to size and variability, almost half of the items showed psychometric equivalence to the American version.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822015000400344
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822015000400344
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2317-1782/20152013032
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv CoDAS v.27 n.4 2015
reponame:CoDAS
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)
instacron:SBFA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)
instacron_str SBFA
institution SBFA
reponame_str CoDAS
collection CoDAS
repository.name.fl_str_mv CoDAS - Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv codas@editoracubo.com.br||revista@codas.org.br
_version_ 1752122440737095680