The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bellotte,José Antonio Miranda
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Kupper,Katia Cristina, Rinaldo,Davi, Souza,Andressa de, Goes,Antonio de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452013000100013
Resumo: This study highlighted the effect of planting coast-cross grass and forage peanut cv. Amarilis between rows of Natal oranges on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa ascospores and consequent citrus black spot control. Treatments evaluated were: 1- conventional cultivation, free of fungicides; 2- conventional cultivation, using protective fungicides; 3- inter-crop cultivation of coast-cross grass between rows of citrus crops and; 4- inter-cropping cultivation of forage peanut between the rows of citrus crops. Quest Volumetric Spore SystemTM traps were set in order to determine the number of ascospores released. A total of 33 inspections were conducted weekly, from the end of August until early September the following year. A diagrammatic scale was used to determine the severity of the disease as well as the percentage of fruits having a commercial standard. The coast-cross grass was more effective in reducing the number of ascospores produced, whose average statistics were lower than in the conventional treatments, free-fungicides. The inter-crop and conventional cultivation method coupled with fungicide treatment was more effective in reducing the severity of citrus black spot symptoms, and differs statistically from the fungicide-free control method. These methods also resulted in a higher percentage of fruits of a commercial standard, ranging from the 89% through the 91% percentile, and the cultivation, free of fungicides, fell within the 73%.
id SBFRU-1_11e90be2903876e3fb0f0354f15d44f0
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-29452013000100013
network_acronym_str SBFRU-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrenceCitrus sinensisCultural controlPhyllosticta citricarpaArachys pintoiCynodon dactylonThis study highlighted the effect of planting coast-cross grass and forage peanut cv. Amarilis between rows of Natal oranges on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa ascospores and consequent citrus black spot control. Treatments evaluated were: 1- conventional cultivation, free of fungicides; 2- conventional cultivation, using protective fungicides; 3- inter-crop cultivation of coast-cross grass between rows of citrus crops and; 4- inter-cropping cultivation of forage peanut between the rows of citrus crops. Quest Volumetric Spore SystemTM traps were set in order to determine the number of ascospores released. A total of 33 inspections were conducted weekly, from the end of August until early September the following year. A diagrammatic scale was used to determine the severity of the disease as well as the percentage of fruits having a commercial standard. The coast-cross grass was more effective in reducing the number of ascospores produced, whose average statistics were lower than in the conventional treatments, free-fungicides. The inter-crop and conventional cultivation method coupled with fungicide treatment was more effective in reducing the severity of citrus black spot symptoms, and differs statistically from the fungicide-free control method. These methods also resulted in a higher percentage of fruits of a commercial standard, ranging from the 89% through the 91% percentile, and the cultivation, free of fungicides, fell within the 73%.Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura2013-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452013000100013Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura v.35 n.1 2013reponame:Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)instacron:SBFRU10.1590/S0100-29452013000100013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBellotte,José Antonio MirandaKupper,Katia CristinaRinaldo,DaviSouza,Andressa deGoes,Antonio deeng2013-05-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-29452013000100013Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbfhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprbf@fcav.unesp.br||http://rbf.org.br/1806-99670100-2945opendoar:2013-05-27T00:00Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence
title The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence
spellingShingle The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence
Bellotte,José Antonio Miranda
Citrus sinensis
Cultural control
Phyllosticta citricarpa
Arachys pintoi
Cynodon dactylon
title_short The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence
title_full The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence
title_fullStr The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence
title_full_unstemmed The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence
title_sort The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence
author Bellotte,José Antonio Miranda
author_facet Bellotte,José Antonio Miranda
Kupper,Katia Cristina
Rinaldo,Davi
Souza,Andressa de
Goes,Antonio de
author_role author
author2 Kupper,Katia Cristina
Rinaldo,Davi
Souza,Andressa de
Goes,Antonio de
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bellotte,José Antonio Miranda
Kupper,Katia Cristina
Rinaldo,Davi
Souza,Andressa de
Goes,Antonio de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Citrus sinensis
Cultural control
Phyllosticta citricarpa
Arachys pintoi
Cynodon dactylon
topic Citrus sinensis
Cultural control
Phyllosticta citricarpa
Arachys pintoi
Cynodon dactylon
description This study highlighted the effect of planting coast-cross grass and forage peanut cv. Amarilis between rows of Natal oranges on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa ascospores and consequent citrus black spot control. Treatments evaluated were: 1- conventional cultivation, free of fungicides; 2- conventional cultivation, using protective fungicides; 3- inter-crop cultivation of coast-cross grass between rows of citrus crops and; 4- inter-cropping cultivation of forage peanut between the rows of citrus crops. Quest Volumetric Spore SystemTM traps were set in order to determine the number of ascospores released. A total of 33 inspections were conducted weekly, from the end of August until early September the following year. A diagrammatic scale was used to determine the severity of the disease as well as the percentage of fruits having a commercial standard. The coast-cross grass was more effective in reducing the number of ascospores produced, whose average statistics were lower than in the conventional treatments, free-fungicides. The inter-crop and conventional cultivation method coupled with fungicide treatment was more effective in reducing the severity of citrus black spot symptoms, and differs statistically from the fungicide-free control method. These methods also resulted in a higher percentage of fruits of a commercial standard, ranging from the 89% through the 91% percentile, and the cultivation, free of fungicides, fell within the 73%.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452013000100013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452013000100013
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-29452013000100013
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura v.35 n.1 2013
reponame:Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
instacron:SBFRU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
instacron_str SBFRU
institution SBFRU
reponame_str Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbf@fcav.unesp.br||http://rbf.org.br/
_version_ 1752122491476639744