The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452013000100013 |
Resumo: | This study highlighted the effect of planting coast-cross grass and forage peanut cv. Amarilis between rows of Natal oranges on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa ascospores and consequent citrus black spot control. Treatments evaluated were: 1- conventional cultivation, free of fungicides; 2- conventional cultivation, using protective fungicides; 3- inter-crop cultivation of coast-cross grass between rows of citrus crops and; 4- inter-cropping cultivation of forage peanut between the rows of citrus crops. Quest Volumetric Spore SystemTM traps were set in order to determine the number of ascospores released. A total of 33 inspections were conducted weekly, from the end of August until early September the following year. A diagrammatic scale was used to determine the severity of the disease as well as the percentage of fruits having a commercial standard. The coast-cross grass was more effective in reducing the number of ascospores produced, whose average statistics were lower than in the conventional treatments, free-fungicides. The inter-crop and conventional cultivation method coupled with fungicide treatment was more effective in reducing the severity of citrus black spot symptoms, and differs statistically from the fungicide-free control method. These methods also resulted in a higher percentage of fruits of a commercial standard, ranging from the 89% through the 91% percentile, and the cultivation, free of fungicides, fell within the 73%. |
id |
SBFRU-1_11e90be2903876e3fb0f0354f15d44f0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-29452013000100013 |
network_acronym_str |
SBFRU-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrenceCitrus sinensisCultural controlPhyllosticta citricarpaArachys pintoiCynodon dactylonThis study highlighted the effect of planting coast-cross grass and forage peanut cv. Amarilis between rows of Natal oranges on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa ascospores and consequent citrus black spot control. Treatments evaluated were: 1- conventional cultivation, free of fungicides; 2- conventional cultivation, using protective fungicides; 3- inter-crop cultivation of coast-cross grass between rows of citrus crops and; 4- inter-cropping cultivation of forage peanut between the rows of citrus crops. Quest Volumetric Spore SystemTM traps were set in order to determine the number of ascospores released. A total of 33 inspections were conducted weekly, from the end of August until early September the following year. A diagrammatic scale was used to determine the severity of the disease as well as the percentage of fruits having a commercial standard. The coast-cross grass was more effective in reducing the number of ascospores produced, whose average statistics were lower than in the conventional treatments, free-fungicides. The inter-crop and conventional cultivation method coupled with fungicide treatment was more effective in reducing the severity of citrus black spot symptoms, and differs statistically from the fungicide-free control method. These methods also resulted in a higher percentage of fruits of a commercial standard, ranging from the 89% through the 91% percentile, and the cultivation, free of fungicides, fell within the 73%.Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura2013-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452013000100013Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura v.35 n.1 2013reponame:Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)instacron:SBFRU10.1590/S0100-29452013000100013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBellotte,José Antonio MirandaKupper,Katia CristinaRinaldo,DaviSouza,Andressa deGoes,Antonio deeng2013-05-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-29452013000100013Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbfhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprbf@fcav.unesp.br||http://rbf.org.br/1806-99670100-2945opendoar:2013-05-27T00:00Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence |
title |
The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence |
spellingShingle |
The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence Bellotte,José Antonio Miranda Citrus sinensis Cultural control Phyllosticta citricarpa Arachys pintoi Cynodon dactylon |
title_short |
The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence |
title_full |
The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence |
title_fullStr |
The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence |
title_sort |
The effects of inter-crop cultivation Between rows of citrus crop on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa Ascospores and in the citrus black spot occurrence |
author |
Bellotte,José Antonio Miranda |
author_facet |
Bellotte,José Antonio Miranda Kupper,Katia Cristina Rinaldo,Davi Souza,Andressa de Goes,Antonio de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kupper,Katia Cristina Rinaldo,Davi Souza,Andressa de Goes,Antonio de |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bellotte,José Antonio Miranda Kupper,Katia Cristina Rinaldo,Davi Souza,Andressa de Goes,Antonio de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Citrus sinensis Cultural control Phyllosticta citricarpa Arachys pintoi Cynodon dactylon |
topic |
Citrus sinensis Cultural control Phyllosticta citricarpa Arachys pintoi Cynodon dactylon |
description |
This study highlighted the effect of planting coast-cross grass and forage peanut cv. Amarilis between rows of Natal oranges on spreading of Guignardia citricarpa ascospores and consequent citrus black spot control. Treatments evaluated were: 1- conventional cultivation, free of fungicides; 2- conventional cultivation, using protective fungicides; 3- inter-crop cultivation of coast-cross grass between rows of citrus crops and; 4- inter-cropping cultivation of forage peanut between the rows of citrus crops. Quest Volumetric Spore SystemTM traps were set in order to determine the number of ascospores released. A total of 33 inspections were conducted weekly, from the end of August until early September the following year. A diagrammatic scale was used to determine the severity of the disease as well as the percentage of fruits having a commercial standard. The coast-cross grass was more effective in reducing the number of ascospores produced, whose average statistics were lower than in the conventional treatments, free-fungicides. The inter-crop and conventional cultivation method coupled with fungicide treatment was more effective in reducing the severity of citrus black spot symptoms, and differs statistically from the fungicide-free control method. These methods also resulted in a higher percentage of fruits of a commercial standard, ranging from the 89% through the 91% percentile, and the cultivation, free of fungicides, fell within the 73%. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452013000100013 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452013000100013 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0100-29452013000100013 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura v.35 n.1 2013 reponame:Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF) instacron:SBFRU |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF) |
instacron_str |
SBFRU |
institution |
SBFRU |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) |
collection |
Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbf@fcav.unesp.br||http://rbf.org.br/ |
_version_ |
1752122491476639744 |