The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Genetics and Molecular Biology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572019000500803 |
Resumo: | Abstract In Dual RNA-Seq experiments the simultaneous extraction of RNA and analysis of gene expression data from both interacting organisms could be a challenge. One alternative is separating the reads during in silico data analysis. There are two main mapping methods used: sequential and combined. Here we present a combined approach in which the libraries were aligned to a concatenated genome to sort the reads before mapping them to the respective annotated genomes. A comparison of this method with the sequential analysis was performed. Two RNA-Seq libraries available in public databases consisting of a eukaryotic (Zea mays) and a prokaryotic (Herbaspirillum seropediceae) organisms were mixed to simulate a Dual RNA-Seq experiment. Libraries from real Dual RNA-Seq experiments were also used. The sequential analysis consistently attributed more reads to the first reference genome used in the analysis (due to cross-mapping) than the combined approach. More importantly, the combined analysis resulted in lower numbers of cross-mapped reads. Our results highlight the necessity of combining the reference genomes to sort reads previously to the counting step to avoid losing information in Dual RNA-Seq experiments. Since most studies first map the RNA-Seq libraries to the eukaryotic genome, much prokaryotic information has probably been lost. |
id |
SBG-1_98555c082f49d54dcd1fe144118ee9d2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1415-47572019000500803 |
network_acronym_str |
SBG-1 |
network_name_str |
Genetics and Molecular Biology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mappingDual RNA-Seqsequential analysiscombined analysismapping strategiesAbstract In Dual RNA-Seq experiments the simultaneous extraction of RNA and analysis of gene expression data from both interacting organisms could be a challenge. One alternative is separating the reads during in silico data analysis. There are two main mapping methods used: sequential and combined. Here we present a combined approach in which the libraries were aligned to a concatenated genome to sort the reads before mapping them to the respective annotated genomes. A comparison of this method with the sequential analysis was performed. Two RNA-Seq libraries available in public databases consisting of a eukaryotic (Zea mays) and a prokaryotic (Herbaspirillum seropediceae) organisms were mixed to simulate a Dual RNA-Seq experiment. Libraries from real Dual RNA-Seq experiments were also used. The sequential analysis consistently attributed more reads to the first reference genome used in the analysis (due to cross-mapping) than the combined approach. More importantly, the combined analysis resulted in lower numbers of cross-mapped reads. Our results highlight the necessity of combining the reference genomes to sort reads previously to the counting step to avoid losing information in Dual RNA-Seq experiments. Since most studies first map the RNA-Seq libraries to the eukaryotic genome, much prokaryotic information has probably been lost.Sociedade Brasileira de Genética2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572019000500803Genetics and Molecular Biology v.42 n.4 2019reponame:Genetics and Molecular Biologyinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG)instacron:SBG10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2019-0215info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEspindula,EliandroSperb,Edilena ReisBach,EvelisePassaglia,Luciane Maria Pereiraeng2020-02-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-47572019000500803Revistahttp://www.gmb.org.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editor@gmb.org.br1678-46851415-4757opendoar:2020-02-06T00:00Genetics and Molecular Biology - Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping |
title |
The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping |
spellingShingle |
The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping Espindula,Eliandro Dual RNA-Seq sequential analysis combined analysis mapping strategies |
title_short |
The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping |
title_full |
The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping |
title_fullStr |
The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping |
title_full_unstemmed |
The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping |
title_sort |
The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping |
author |
Espindula,Eliandro |
author_facet |
Espindula,Eliandro Sperb,Edilena Reis Bach,Evelise Passaglia,Luciane Maria Pereira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sperb,Edilena Reis Bach,Evelise Passaglia,Luciane Maria Pereira |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Espindula,Eliandro Sperb,Edilena Reis Bach,Evelise Passaglia,Luciane Maria Pereira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dual RNA-Seq sequential analysis combined analysis mapping strategies |
topic |
Dual RNA-Seq sequential analysis combined analysis mapping strategies |
description |
Abstract In Dual RNA-Seq experiments the simultaneous extraction of RNA and analysis of gene expression data from both interacting organisms could be a challenge. One alternative is separating the reads during in silico data analysis. There are two main mapping methods used: sequential and combined. Here we present a combined approach in which the libraries were aligned to a concatenated genome to sort the reads before mapping them to the respective annotated genomes. A comparison of this method with the sequential analysis was performed. Two RNA-Seq libraries available in public databases consisting of a eukaryotic (Zea mays) and a prokaryotic (Herbaspirillum seropediceae) organisms were mixed to simulate a Dual RNA-Seq experiment. Libraries from real Dual RNA-Seq experiments were also used. The sequential analysis consistently attributed more reads to the first reference genome used in the analysis (due to cross-mapping) than the combined approach. More importantly, the combined analysis resulted in lower numbers of cross-mapped reads. Our results highlight the necessity of combining the reference genomes to sort reads previously to the counting step to avoid losing information in Dual RNA-Seq experiments. Since most studies first map the RNA-Seq libraries to the eukaryotic genome, much prokaryotic information has probably been lost. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572019000500803 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572019000500803 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2019-0215 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Genética |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Genética |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Genetics and Molecular Biology v.42 n.4 2019 reponame:Genetics and Molecular Biology instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG) instacron:SBG |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG) |
instacron_str |
SBG |
institution |
SBG |
reponame_str |
Genetics and Molecular Biology |
collection |
Genetics and Molecular Biology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Genetics and Molecular Biology - Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||editor@gmb.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122389280325632 |