The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Espindula,Eliandro
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Sperb,Edilena Reis, Bach,Evelise, Passaglia,Luciane Maria Pereira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Genetics and Molecular Biology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572019000500803
Resumo: Abstract In Dual RNA-Seq experiments the simultaneous extraction of RNA and analysis of gene expression data from both interacting organisms could be a challenge. One alternative is separating the reads during in silico data analysis. There are two main mapping methods used: sequential and combined. Here we present a combined approach in which the libraries were aligned to a concatenated genome to sort the reads before mapping them to the respective annotated genomes. A comparison of this method with the sequential analysis was performed. Two RNA-Seq libraries available in public databases consisting of a eukaryotic (Zea mays) and a prokaryotic (Herbaspirillum seropediceae) organisms were mixed to simulate a Dual RNA-Seq experiment. Libraries from real Dual RNA-Seq experiments were also used. The sequential analysis consistently attributed more reads to the first reference genome used in the analysis (due to cross-mapping) than the combined approach. More importantly, the combined analysis resulted in lower numbers of cross-mapped reads. Our results highlight the necessity of combining the reference genomes to sort reads previously to the counting step to avoid losing information in Dual RNA-Seq experiments. Since most studies first map the RNA-Seq libraries to the eukaryotic genome, much prokaryotic information has probably been lost.
id SBG-1_98555c082f49d54dcd1fe144118ee9d2
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1415-47572019000500803
network_acronym_str SBG-1
network_name_str Genetics and Molecular Biology
repository_id_str
spelling The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mappingDual RNA-Seqsequential analysiscombined analysismapping strategiesAbstract In Dual RNA-Seq experiments the simultaneous extraction of RNA and analysis of gene expression data from both interacting organisms could be a challenge. One alternative is separating the reads during in silico data analysis. There are two main mapping methods used: sequential and combined. Here we present a combined approach in which the libraries were aligned to a concatenated genome to sort the reads before mapping them to the respective annotated genomes. A comparison of this method with the sequential analysis was performed. Two RNA-Seq libraries available in public databases consisting of a eukaryotic (Zea mays) and a prokaryotic (Herbaspirillum seropediceae) organisms were mixed to simulate a Dual RNA-Seq experiment. Libraries from real Dual RNA-Seq experiments were also used. The sequential analysis consistently attributed more reads to the first reference genome used in the analysis (due to cross-mapping) than the combined approach. More importantly, the combined analysis resulted in lower numbers of cross-mapped reads. Our results highlight the necessity of combining the reference genomes to sort reads previously to the counting step to avoid losing information in Dual RNA-Seq experiments. Since most studies first map the RNA-Seq libraries to the eukaryotic genome, much prokaryotic information has probably been lost.Sociedade Brasileira de Genética2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572019000500803Genetics and Molecular Biology v.42 n.4 2019reponame:Genetics and Molecular Biologyinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG)instacron:SBG10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2019-0215info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEspindula,EliandroSperb,Edilena ReisBach,EvelisePassaglia,Luciane Maria Pereiraeng2020-02-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-47572019000500803Revistahttp://www.gmb.org.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editor@gmb.org.br1678-46851415-4757opendoar:2020-02-06T00:00Genetics and Molecular Biology - Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping
title The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping
spellingShingle The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping
Espindula,Eliandro
Dual RNA-Seq
sequential analysis
combined analysis
mapping strategies
title_short The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping
title_full The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping
title_fullStr The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping
title_full_unstemmed The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping
title_sort The combined analysis as the best strategy for Dual RNA-Seq mapping
author Espindula,Eliandro
author_facet Espindula,Eliandro
Sperb,Edilena Reis
Bach,Evelise
Passaglia,Luciane Maria Pereira
author_role author
author2 Sperb,Edilena Reis
Bach,Evelise
Passaglia,Luciane Maria Pereira
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Espindula,Eliandro
Sperb,Edilena Reis
Bach,Evelise
Passaglia,Luciane Maria Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dual RNA-Seq
sequential analysis
combined analysis
mapping strategies
topic Dual RNA-Seq
sequential analysis
combined analysis
mapping strategies
description Abstract In Dual RNA-Seq experiments the simultaneous extraction of RNA and analysis of gene expression data from both interacting organisms could be a challenge. One alternative is separating the reads during in silico data analysis. There are two main mapping methods used: sequential and combined. Here we present a combined approach in which the libraries were aligned to a concatenated genome to sort the reads before mapping them to the respective annotated genomes. A comparison of this method with the sequential analysis was performed. Two RNA-Seq libraries available in public databases consisting of a eukaryotic (Zea mays) and a prokaryotic (Herbaspirillum seropediceae) organisms were mixed to simulate a Dual RNA-Seq experiment. Libraries from real Dual RNA-Seq experiments were also used. The sequential analysis consistently attributed more reads to the first reference genome used in the analysis (due to cross-mapping) than the combined approach. More importantly, the combined analysis resulted in lower numbers of cross-mapped reads. Our results highlight the necessity of combining the reference genomes to sort reads previously to the counting step to avoid losing information in Dual RNA-Seq experiments. Since most studies first map the RNA-Seq libraries to the eukaryotic genome, much prokaryotic information has probably been lost.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572019000500803
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572019000500803
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2019-0215
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Genética
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Genética
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Genetics and Molecular Biology v.42 n.4 2019
reponame:Genetics and Molecular Biology
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG)
instacron:SBG
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG)
instacron_str SBG
institution SBG
reponame_str Genetics and Molecular Biology
collection Genetics and Molecular Biology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Genetics and Molecular Biology - Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||editor@gmb.org.br
_version_ 1752122389280325632