Comparing results of qi aasi questionnaire application in elderly patients with hearing Aids

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribas,Ângela
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Massi,Giselle, Zeigelboim,Bianca
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ggaging.com/details/167
Resumo: <p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> The use of questionnaires for the evaluation of auditory prosthesis output is very important in the clinical practice of speech-language pathology because it supplies the professional with important data that aids in patient follow-up. In Brazil and the rest of world there are many proposed models.<br> <b>OBJECTIVE:</b> The objective of this paper is to study the International Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Individual Sound Amplification Devices to verify if its application by the researcher interferes in the quality of the patient's answer.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> The results of the questionnaire were evaluated in 400 elderly, literate patients, who used auditory prostheses; this was applied at two moments - first the patient answered the questions by himself (self-application) and secondly the researcher reapplied the questionnaire asking the questions himself.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> The results revealed that there was no significant difference statistically among the answers given by the patients during self-evaluation or during the application by the professional.<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> The instrument has similar results when applied by the patient or by the speech therapist.</p>
id SBGG_ef7f2bb254d25a81b509b60ee13aefbf
oai_identifier_str oai:ggaging.com:167
network_acronym_str SBGG
network_name_str Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparing results of qi aasi questionnaire application in elderly patients with hearing AidsSpeech, language and hearing sciences, deafness, aged, hearing aids, satisfaction.<p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> The use of questionnaires for the evaluation of auditory prosthesis output is very important in the clinical practice of speech-language pathology because it supplies the professional with important data that aids in patient follow-up. In Brazil and the rest of world there are many proposed models.<br> <b>OBJECTIVE:</b> The objective of this paper is to study the International Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Individual Sound Amplification Devices to verify if its application by the researcher interferes in the quality of the patient's answer.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> The results of the questionnaire were evaluated in 400 elderly, literate patients, who used auditory prostheses; this was applied at two moments - first the patient answered the questions by himself (self-application) and secondly the researcher reapplied the questionnaire asking the questions himself.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> The results revealed that there was no significant difference statistically among the answers given by the patients during self-evaluation or during the application by the professional.<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> The instrument has similar results when applied by the patient or by the speech therapist.</p>Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia2013-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttps://ggaging.com/details/167Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.7 n.1 2013reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiainstacron:SBGGinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Ribas,Ângela Massi,Giselle Zeigelboim,Biancaeng2013-01-01T00:00:00Zoai:ggaging.com:167Revistahttp://sbgg.org.br/publicacoes-cientificas/revista-geriatria-gerontologia/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpexecutiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br2447-21232447-2115opendoar:2013-01-01T00:00Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparing results of qi aasi questionnaire application in elderly patients with hearing Aids
title Comparing results of qi aasi questionnaire application in elderly patients with hearing Aids
spellingShingle Comparing results of qi aasi questionnaire application in elderly patients with hearing Aids
Ribas,Ângela
Speech, language and hearing sciences, deafness, aged, hearing aids, satisfaction.
title_short Comparing results of qi aasi questionnaire application in elderly patients with hearing Aids
title_full Comparing results of qi aasi questionnaire application in elderly patients with hearing Aids
title_fullStr Comparing results of qi aasi questionnaire application in elderly patients with hearing Aids
title_full_unstemmed Comparing results of qi aasi questionnaire application in elderly patients with hearing Aids
title_sort Comparing results of qi aasi questionnaire application in elderly patients with hearing Aids
author Ribas,Ângela
author_facet Ribas,Ângela
Massi,Giselle
Zeigelboim,Bianca
author_role author
author2 Massi,Giselle
Zeigelboim,Bianca
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribas,Ângela
Massi,Giselle
Zeigelboim,Bianca
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Speech, language and hearing sciences, deafness, aged, hearing aids, satisfaction.
topic Speech, language and hearing sciences, deafness, aged, hearing aids, satisfaction.
description <p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> The use of questionnaires for the evaluation of auditory prosthesis output is very important in the clinical practice of speech-language pathology because it supplies the professional with important data that aids in patient follow-up. In Brazil and the rest of world there are many proposed models.<br> <b>OBJECTIVE:</b> The objective of this paper is to study the International Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Individual Sound Amplification Devices to verify if its application by the researcher interferes in the quality of the patient's answer.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> The results of the questionnaire were evaluated in 400 elderly, literate patients, who used auditory prostheses; this was applied at two moments - first the patient answered the questions by himself (self-application) and secondly the researcher reapplied the questionnaire asking the questions himself.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> The results revealed that there was no significant difference statistically among the answers given by the patients during self-evaluation or during the application by the professional.<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> The instrument has similar results when applied by the patient or by the speech therapist.</p>
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ggaging.com/details/167
url https://ggaging.com/details/167
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.7 n.1 2013
reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
instacron:SBGG
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
instacron_str SBGG
institution SBGG
reponame_str Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
collection Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv executiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br
_version_ 1797174501193023488