Evaluation of the counterimmunoelectrophoresis reaction as a serodiagnosis test for swine leptospirosis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2001 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822001000200016 |
Resumo: | The Counterimmunoelectrophoresis reaction (CIE) was tested as a genus specific test for swine leptospirosis diagnosis using three soluble extracts obtained from Leptospira sp, serovars pomona, icterohaemorrhagiae and patoc. The extracts were treated with hot Triton X-100 and applied to serum samples of animals divided in three groups: Group 1, 10 swines experimentally infected with the Pomona strain; Group 2, 50 naturally infected swines and Group 3, 10 swines control. These animals were serologically evaluated by CIE and by the Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT), the WHO reference technique. Groups 1 and 3 were monitored during a period of 93 days after infection (a.i.). Group 1 serum convertion took place around the 10th day a.i. by MAT but ocurred earlier by CIE using any antigen. When CIE was carried out with the homologous antigen to the experimental infection, the results were consistent with MAT, but not when the heterologous antigens were used. Groups 1 and 3 showed distinct results: in Group 3, diferences between results of CIE accomplished with any three antigen extracts were not significant, indicating lack of dependence on the serovar responsible for the outbreak. Although being safe, fast, easy to perform, inexpensive and ideal for analysis of large number of samples, CIE revealed limited genus specificity, which is not convenient for field screening tests. The advantage of CIE is the capability to detect antibodies earlier than MAT. |
id |
SBM-1_58101581d6146dfc0c13b69cbaa32447 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1517-83822001000200016 |
network_acronym_str |
SBM-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of the counterimmunoelectrophoresis reaction as a serodiagnosis test for swine leptospirosisCounterimmunoelectrophoresisswine leptospirosisseradiagnosisThe Counterimmunoelectrophoresis reaction (CIE) was tested as a genus specific test for swine leptospirosis diagnosis using three soluble extracts obtained from Leptospira sp, serovars pomona, icterohaemorrhagiae and patoc. The extracts were treated with hot Triton X-100 and applied to serum samples of animals divided in three groups: Group 1, 10 swines experimentally infected with the Pomona strain; Group 2, 50 naturally infected swines and Group 3, 10 swines control. These animals were serologically evaluated by CIE and by the Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT), the WHO reference technique. Groups 1 and 3 were monitored during a period of 93 days after infection (a.i.). Group 1 serum convertion took place around the 10th day a.i. by MAT but ocurred earlier by CIE using any antigen. When CIE was carried out with the homologous antigen to the experimental infection, the results were consistent with MAT, but not when the heterologous antigens were used. Groups 1 and 3 showed distinct results: in Group 3, diferences between results of CIE accomplished with any three antigen extracts were not significant, indicating lack of dependence on the serovar responsible for the outbreak. Although being safe, fast, easy to perform, inexpensive and ideal for analysis of large number of samples, CIE revealed limited genus specificity, which is not convenient for field screening tests. The advantage of CIE is the capability to detect antibodies earlier than MAT.Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia2001-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822001000200016Brazilian Journal of Microbiology v.32 n.2 2001reponame:Brazilian Journal of Microbiologyinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)instacron:SBM10.1590/S1517-83822001000200016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGenovez,Margareth ÉlideYasuda,Paulo HidekiVasconcellos,Silvio ArrudaScarcelli,ElianaCardoso,Maristela VasconcellosGirio,Raul da Silvaeng2001-12-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1517-83822001000200016Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjm/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjm@sbmicrobiologia.org.br||mbmartin@usp.br1678-44051517-8382opendoar:2001-12-12T00:00Brazilian Journal of Microbiology - Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the counterimmunoelectrophoresis reaction as a serodiagnosis test for swine leptospirosis |
title |
Evaluation of the counterimmunoelectrophoresis reaction as a serodiagnosis test for swine leptospirosis |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the counterimmunoelectrophoresis reaction as a serodiagnosis test for swine leptospirosis Genovez,Margareth Élide Counterimmunoelectrophoresis swine leptospirosis seradiagnosis |
title_short |
Evaluation of the counterimmunoelectrophoresis reaction as a serodiagnosis test for swine leptospirosis |
title_full |
Evaluation of the counterimmunoelectrophoresis reaction as a serodiagnosis test for swine leptospirosis |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the counterimmunoelectrophoresis reaction as a serodiagnosis test for swine leptospirosis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the counterimmunoelectrophoresis reaction as a serodiagnosis test for swine leptospirosis |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the counterimmunoelectrophoresis reaction as a serodiagnosis test for swine leptospirosis |
author |
Genovez,Margareth Élide |
author_facet |
Genovez,Margareth Élide Yasuda,Paulo Hideki Vasconcellos,Silvio Arruda Scarcelli,Eliana Cardoso,Maristela Vasconcellos Girio,Raul da Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Yasuda,Paulo Hideki Vasconcellos,Silvio Arruda Scarcelli,Eliana Cardoso,Maristela Vasconcellos Girio,Raul da Silva |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Genovez,Margareth Élide Yasuda,Paulo Hideki Vasconcellos,Silvio Arruda Scarcelli,Eliana Cardoso,Maristela Vasconcellos Girio,Raul da Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Counterimmunoelectrophoresis swine leptospirosis seradiagnosis |
topic |
Counterimmunoelectrophoresis swine leptospirosis seradiagnosis |
description |
The Counterimmunoelectrophoresis reaction (CIE) was tested as a genus specific test for swine leptospirosis diagnosis using three soluble extracts obtained from Leptospira sp, serovars pomona, icterohaemorrhagiae and patoc. The extracts were treated with hot Triton X-100 and applied to serum samples of animals divided in three groups: Group 1, 10 swines experimentally infected with the Pomona strain; Group 2, 50 naturally infected swines and Group 3, 10 swines control. These animals were serologically evaluated by CIE and by the Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT), the WHO reference technique. Groups 1 and 3 were monitored during a period of 93 days after infection (a.i.). Group 1 serum convertion took place around the 10th day a.i. by MAT but ocurred earlier by CIE using any antigen. When CIE was carried out with the homologous antigen to the experimental infection, the results were consistent with MAT, but not when the heterologous antigens were used. Groups 1 and 3 showed distinct results: in Group 3, diferences between results of CIE accomplished with any three antigen extracts were not significant, indicating lack of dependence on the serovar responsible for the outbreak. Although being safe, fast, easy to perform, inexpensive and ideal for analysis of large number of samples, CIE revealed limited genus specificity, which is not convenient for field screening tests. The advantage of CIE is the capability to detect antibodies earlier than MAT. |
publishDate |
2001 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2001-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822001000200016 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822001000200016 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1517-83822001000200016 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology v.32 n.2 2001 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Microbiology instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM) instacron:SBM |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM) |
instacron_str |
SBM |
institution |
SBM |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology - Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjm@sbmicrobiologia.org.br||mbmartin@usp.br |
_version_ |
1752122198911352832 |