Repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam HR system
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802012000100003 |
Resumo: | PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement at the geometrical center (Central Corneal Thickness - CCT) given by the Pentacam High Resolution (HR) Comprehensive Eye Scanner (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) over time. METHODS: Prospective, single center, observational study. Two separate CCT measurements were taken by the Pentacam corneal tomography exam (CTm) 3 to 12 months apart, and compared. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen eyes (n=116) of 62 health patients were included in this study. Average CCT in first and last visits was 541.6±37 µm and 543.6±36.9 µm respectively. Mean difference between both measurements was 9.2±6.4 µm, and there was no statistically significant difference in CCT measurement between visits, with good correlation between them (P = 0.057, r² = 0,9209). CONCLUSION: Pentacam (HR) CTm gives repeatable CCT measurements over time. |
id |
SBO-1_eced60b8fd32b200e17c86cc60609fd7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-72802012000100003 |
network_acronym_str |
SBO-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam HR systemCornea/anatomy & histologyCorneal topographyBiometry/methodsReproducibility of resultsDiagnostic techniquesophthalmological/instrumentationPURPOSE: To assess the repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement at the geometrical center (Central Corneal Thickness - CCT) given by the Pentacam High Resolution (HR) Comprehensive Eye Scanner (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) over time. METHODS: Prospective, single center, observational study. Two separate CCT measurements were taken by the Pentacam corneal tomography exam (CTm) 3 to 12 months apart, and compared. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen eyes (n=116) of 62 health patients were included in this study. Average CCT in first and last visits was 541.6±37 µm and 543.6±36.9 µm respectively. Mean difference between both measurements was 9.2±6.4 µm, and there was no statistically significant difference in CCT measurement between visits, with good correlation between them (P = 0.057, r² = 0,9209). CONCLUSION: Pentacam (HR) CTm gives repeatable CCT measurements over time.Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia2012-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802012000100003Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia v.71 n.1 2012reponame:Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)instacron:SBO10.1590/S0034-72802012000100003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlonso,Ruiz SimonatoFontes,Bruno MachadoVentura,Marcelo PalisAmbrósio Jr,Renatoeng2012-03-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-72802012000100003Revistahttps://rbo.emnuvens.com.br/rbo/indexhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsob@sboportal.org.br||rbo@sboportal.org.br1982-85510034-7280opendoar:2012-03-12T00:00Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam HR system |
title |
Repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam HR system |
spellingShingle |
Repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam HR system Alonso,Ruiz Simonato Cornea/anatomy & histology Corneal topography Biometry/methods Reproducibility of results Diagnostic techniques ophthalmological/instrumentation |
title_short |
Repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam HR system |
title_full |
Repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam HR system |
title_fullStr |
Repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam HR system |
title_full_unstemmed |
Repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam HR system |
title_sort |
Repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam HR system |
author |
Alonso,Ruiz Simonato |
author_facet |
Alonso,Ruiz Simonato Fontes,Bruno Machado Ventura,Marcelo Palis Ambrósio Jr,Renato |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fontes,Bruno Machado Ventura,Marcelo Palis Ambrósio Jr,Renato |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alonso,Ruiz Simonato Fontes,Bruno Machado Ventura,Marcelo Palis Ambrósio Jr,Renato |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cornea/anatomy & histology Corneal topography Biometry/methods Reproducibility of results Diagnostic techniques ophthalmological/instrumentation |
topic |
Cornea/anatomy & histology Corneal topography Biometry/methods Reproducibility of results Diagnostic techniques ophthalmological/instrumentation |
description |
PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement at the geometrical center (Central Corneal Thickness - CCT) given by the Pentacam High Resolution (HR) Comprehensive Eye Scanner (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) over time. METHODS: Prospective, single center, observational study. Two separate CCT measurements were taken by the Pentacam corneal tomography exam (CTm) 3 to 12 months apart, and compared. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen eyes (n=116) of 62 health patients were included in this study. Average CCT in first and last visits was 541.6±37 µm and 543.6±36.9 µm respectively. Mean difference between both measurements was 9.2±6.4 µm, and there was no statistically significant difference in CCT measurement between visits, with good correlation between them (P = 0.057, r² = 0,9209). CONCLUSION: Pentacam (HR) CTm gives repeatable CCT measurements over time. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802012000100003 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802012000100003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0034-72802012000100003 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia v.71 n.1 2012 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO) instacron:SBO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO) |
instacron_str |
SBO |
institution |
SBO |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sob@sboportal.org.br||rbo@sboportal.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122336026296320 |