Bioactive glass in cavitary bone defects: a comparative experimental study in rabbits

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Camargo,André Ferrari de França
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Baptista,André Mathias, Natalino,Renato, Camargo,Olavo Pires de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522015000400202
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: To compare bioactive glass and autograft regarding their histomorphometric characteristics. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective case-control experimental study on animals in order to compare the histomorphometric characteristics of bioactive glass versus autograft. Eight rabbits underwent surgery in which a cavitary defect was created in both proximal femurs. One side was filled with bioactive glass granules and the other, with autograft grafted from the contralateral side. The sides were randomized. Fourteen days after surgery, the animals were euthanized. RESULTS: Histologic analysis revealed that bone neoformation was equivalent among the two groups and the osteoblasts cell-count was higher in the femurs treated with bioactive glass. The osteocytes cell-count, however, was lower. The similarity in bone formation between both groups was consistent to literature findings. CONCLUSION: Bioactive glass is similar to autograft regarding bone neoformation in this animal model of cavitary bone defects. Level of Evidence III, Case-Control Study.
id SBOT-1_5da96deb2d16a718d5f97127323f7d46
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-78522015000400202
network_acronym_str SBOT-1
network_name_str Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Bioactive glass in cavitary bone defects: a comparative experimental study in rabbitsBone transplantationOsteogenesisRabbits OBJECTIVES: To compare bioactive glass and autograft regarding their histomorphometric characteristics. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective case-control experimental study on animals in order to compare the histomorphometric characteristics of bioactive glass versus autograft. Eight rabbits underwent surgery in which a cavitary defect was created in both proximal femurs. One side was filled with bioactive glass granules and the other, with autograft grafted from the contralateral side. The sides were randomized. Fourteen days after surgery, the animals were euthanized. RESULTS: Histologic analysis revealed that bone neoformation was equivalent among the two groups and the osteoblasts cell-count was higher in the femurs treated with bioactive glass. The osteocytes cell-count, however, was lower. The similarity in bone formation between both groups was consistent to literature findings. CONCLUSION: Bioactive glass is similar to autograft regarding bone neoformation in this animal model of cavitary bone defects. Level of Evidence III, Case-Control Study. ATHA EDITORA2015-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522015000400202Acta Ortopédica Brasileira v.23 n.4 2015reponame:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1590/1413-785220152304147538info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCamargo,André Ferrari de FrançaBaptista,André MathiasNatalino,RenatoCamargo,Olavo Pires deeng2015-08-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-78522015000400202Revistahttp://www.actaortopedica.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php1atha@uol.com.br||actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br1809-44061413-7852opendoar:2015-08-04T00:00Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bioactive glass in cavitary bone defects: a comparative experimental study in rabbits
title Bioactive glass in cavitary bone defects: a comparative experimental study in rabbits
spellingShingle Bioactive glass in cavitary bone defects: a comparative experimental study in rabbits
Camargo,André Ferrari de França
Bone transplantation
Osteogenesis
Rabbits
title_short Bioactive glass in cavitary bone defects: a comparative experimental study in rabbits
title_full Bioactive glass in cavitary bone defects: a comparative experimental study in rabbits
title_fullStr Bioactive glass in cavitary bone defects: a comparative experimental study in rabbits
title_full_unstemmed Bioactive glass in cavitary bone defects: a comparative experimental study in rabbits
title_sort Bioactive glass in cavitary bone defects: a comparative experimental study in rabbits
author Camargo,André Ferrari de França
author_facet Camargo,André Ferrari de França
Baptista,André Mathias
Natalino,Renato
Camargo,Olavo Pires de
author_role author
author2 Baptista,André Mathias
Natalino,Renato
Camargo,Olavo Pires de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Camargo,André Ferrari de França
Baptista,André Mathias
Natalino,Renato
Camargo,Olavo Pires de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bone transplantation
Osteogenesis
Rabbits
topic Bone transplantation
Osteogenesis
Rabbits
description OBJECTIVES: To compare bioactive glass and autograft regarding their histomorphometric characteristics. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective case-control experimental study on animals in order to compare the histomorphometric characteristics of bioactive glass versus autograft. Eight rabbits underwent surgery in which a cavitary defect was created in both proximal femurs. One side was filled with bioactive glass granules and the other, with autograft grafted from the contralateral side. The sides were randomized. Fourteen days after surgery, the animals were euthanized. RESULTS: Histologic analysis revealed that bone neoformation was equivalent among the two groups and the osteoblasts cell-count was higher in the femurs treated with bioactive glass. The osteocytes cell-count, however, was lower. The similarity in bone formation between both groups was consistent to literature findings. CONCLUSION: Bioactive glass is similar to autograft regarding bone neoformation in this animal model of cavitary bone defects. Level of Evidence III, Case-Control Study.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522015000400202
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522015000400202
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1413-785220152304147538
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ATHA EDITORA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ATHA EDITORA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Ortopédica Brasileira v.23 n.4 2015
reponame:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
collection Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv 1atha@uol.com.br||actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752122275164848128