DIRECT PEDICLE SCREW INSERTION PULLOUT STRENGTH
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522021000400203 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: Study the in vitro pullout strength of SpineGuard/Zavation Dynamic Surgical Guidance Z-Direct Screw (DSG Screw), a screw pedicle designed to be inserted using a direct insertion technique. Methods: DSG Screws of 5.5 mm and 6.5 mm were introduced into polyurethane blocks with a density of 10 PCF (0,16 g/cm3). According to the experimental group, screws were inserted without pilot hole, with pilot without tapping, undertapping and line-to-line tapping. Screw pullout tests were performed using a universal test machine after screw insertion into polyurethane blocks. Results: Screws inserted directly into the polyurethane blocks without pilot hole and tapping showed a statistically higher pullout strength. Insertion of the screw without tapping or with undertapping increases the pullout screw strength compared to line-to-line tapping. Conclusion: DSG Screw showed the highest pullout strength after its insertion without pilot hole and tapping. Level of Evidence V, Expert Opinion. |
id |
SBOT-1_836476cb8523d68f3e434b516c365eaf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1413-78522021000400203 |
network_acronym_str |
SBOT-1 |
network_name_str |
Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
DIRECT PEDICLE SCREW INSERTION PULLOUT STRENGTHPedicle ScrewsSpinal FusionIn Vitro TechniquesTensile StrengthABSTRACT Objective: Study the in vitro pullout strength of SpineGuard/Zavation Dynamic Surgical Guidance Z-Direct Screw (DSG Screw), a screw pedicle designed to be inserted using a direct insertion technique. Methods: DSG Screws of 5.5 mm and 6.5 mm were introduced into polyurethane blocks with a density of 10 PCF (0,16 g/cm3). According to the experimental group, screws were inserted without pilot hole, with pilot without tapping, undertapping and line-to-line tapping. Screw pullout tests were performed using a universal test machine after screw insertion into polyurethane blocks. Results: Screws inserted directly into the polyurethane blocks without pilot hole and tapping showed a statistically higher pullout strength. Insertion of the screw without tapping or with undertapping increases the pullout screw strength compared to line-to-line tapping. Conclusion: DSG Screw showed the highest pullout strength after its insertion without pilot hole and tapping. Level of Evidence V, Expert Opinion.ATHA EDITORA2021-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522021000400203Acta Ortopédica Brasileira v.29 n.4 2021reponame:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1590/1413-785220212904241648info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPINHEIRO,RÔMULO PEDROZAZAMARIOLI,ARIANECHANDANSON,THIBAULTGEORGE,KERISHIMANO,ANTONIO CARLOSDEFINO,HELTON LUIZ APARECIDOeng2021-09-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-78522021000400203Revistahttp://www.actaortopedica.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php1atha@uol.com.br||actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br1809-44061413-7852opendoar:2021-09-08T00:00Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
DIRECT PEDICLE SCREW INSERTION PULLOUT STRENGTH |
title |
DIRECT PEDICLE SCREW INSERTION PULLOUT STRENGTH |
spellingShingle |
DIRECT PEDICLE SCREW INSERTION PULLOUT STRENGTH PINHEIRO,RÔMULO PEDROZA Pedicle Screws Spinal Fusion In Vitro Techniques Tensile Strength |
title_short |
DIRECT PEDICLE SCREW INSERTION PULLOUT STRENGTH |
title_full |
DIRECT PEDICLE SCREW INSERTION PULLOUT STRENGTH |
title_fullStr |
DIRECT PEDICLE SCREW INSERTION PULLOUT STRENGTH |
title_full_unstemmed |
DIRECT PEDICLE SCREW INSERTION PULLOUT STRENGTH |
title_sort |
DIRECT PEDICLE SCREW INSERTION PULLOUT STRENGTH |
author |
PINHEIRO,RÔMULO PEDROZA |
author_facet |
PINHEIRO,RÔMULO PEDROZA ZAMARIOLI,ARIANE CHANDANSON,THIBAULT GEORGE,KERI SHIMANO,ANTONIO CARLOS DEFINO,HELTON LUIZ APARECIDO |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
ZAMARIOLI,ARIANE CHANDANSON,THIBAULT GEORGE,KERI SHIMANO,ANTONIO CARLOS DEFINO,HELTON LUIZ APARECIDO |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
PINHEIRO,RÔMULO PEDROZA ZAMARIOLI,ARIANE CHANDANSON,THIBAULT GEORGE,KERI SHIMANO,ANTONIO CARLOS DEFINO,HELTON LUIZ APARECIDO |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pedicle Screws Spinal Fusion In Vitro Techniques Tensile Strength |
topic |
Pedicle Screws Spinal Fusion In Vitro Techniques Tensile Strength |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: Study the in vitro pullout strength of SpineGuard/Zavation Dynamic Surgical Guidance Z-Direct Screw (DSG Screw), a screw pedicle designed to be inserted using a direct insertion technique. Methods: DSG Screws of 5.5 mm and 6.5 mm were introduced into polyurethane blocks with a density of 10 PCF (0,16 g/cm3). According to the experimental group, screws were inserted without pilot hole, with pilot without tapping, undertapping and line-to-line tapping. Screw pullout tests were performed using a universal test machine after screw insertion into polyurethane blocks. Results: Screws inserted directly into the polyurethane blocks without pilot hole and tapping showed a statistically higher pullout strength. Insertion of the screw without tapping or with undertapping increases the pullout screw strength compared to line-to-line tapping. Conclusion: DSG Screw showed the highest pullout strength after its insertion without pilot hole and tapping. Level of Evidence V, Expert Opinion. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522021000400203 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522021000400203 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1413-785220212904241648 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ATHA EDITORA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ATHA EDITORA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Ortopédica Brasileira v.29 n.4 2021 reponame:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) instacron:SBOT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
instacron_str |
SBOT |
institution |
SBOT |
reponame_str |
Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
1atha@uol.com.br||actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br |
_version_ |
1752122276927504384 |