ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS OF ACCESSORY TO SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE TRANSFER
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522018000500332 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: Nerve transfers are an alternative in the reconstruction of traumatic brachial plexus injuries. In this study, we report the results of branchial plexus reconstruction using accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer. Methods: Thirty-three patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries underwent surgical reconstruction with accessory to suprascapular nerve transfers. The patients were divided into groups in which surgery was performed either within 6 months after the injury or more than 6 months after the injury. Results were assessed using the Constant score. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to the Constant score. Conclusion: Accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer was not an efficient method for recovering active ROM or strength in the shoulder. However, it effectively improved pain control and shoulder stability. Level of evidence II, Retrospective Study. |
id |
SBOT-1_c3697db537b31a02f605b76a42839dba |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1413-78522018000500332 |
network_acronym_str |
SBOT-1 |
network_name_str |
Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS OF ACCESSORY TO SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE TRANSFERBrachial plexusNerve transferAccessory nerveShoulderABSTRACT Objective: Nerve transfers are an alternative in the reconstruction of traumatic brachial plexus injuries. In this study, we report the results of branchial plexus reconstruction using accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer. Methods: Thirty-three patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries underwent surgical reconstruction with accessory to suprascapular nerve transfers. The patients were divided into groups in which surgery was performed either within 6 months after the injury or more than 6 months after the injury. Results were assessed using the Constant score. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to the Constant score. Conclusion: Accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer was not an efficient method for recovering active ROM or strength in the shoulder. However, it effectively improved pain control and shoulder stability. Level of evidence II, Retrospective Study.ATHA EDITORA2018-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522018000500332Acta Ortopédica Brasileira v.26 n.5 2018reponame:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1590/1413-785220182605193532info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbdouni,Yussef AliChecoli,Gabriel FariaSalles Filho,Horacio CardosoCosta,Antonio Carlos daChakkour,IvanFucs,Patricia Maria de Moraes Barroseng2018-10-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-78522018000500332Revistahttp://www.actaortopedica.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php1atha@uol.com.br||actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br1809-44061413-7852opendoar:2018-10-30T00:00Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS OF ACCESSORY TO SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE TRANSFER |
title |
ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS OF ACCESSORY TO SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE TRANSFER |
spellingShingle |
ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS OF ACCESSORY TO SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE TRANSFER Abdouni,Yussef Ali Brachial plexus Nerve transfer Accessory nerve Shoulder |
title_short |
ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS OF ACCESSORY TO SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE TRANSFER |
title_full |
ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS OF ACCESSORY TO SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE TRANSFER |
title_fullStr |
ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS OF ACCESSORY TO SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE TRANSFER |
title_full_unstemmed |
ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS OF ACCESSORY TO SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE TRANSFER |
title_sort |
ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS OF ACCESSORY TO SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE TRANSFER |
author |
Abdouni,Yussef Ali |
author_facet |
Abdouni,Yussef Ali Checoli,Gabriel Faria Salles Filho,Horacio Cardoso Costa,Antonio Carlos da Chakkour,Ivan Fucs,Patricia Maria de Moraes Barros |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Checoli,Gabriel Faria Salles Filho,Horacio Cardoso Costa,Antonio Carlos da Chakkour,Ivan Fucs,Patricia Maria de Moraes Barros |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Abdouni,Yussef Ali Checoli,Gabriel Faria Salles Filho,Horacio Cardoso Costa,Antonio Carlos da Chakkour,Ivan Fucs,Patricia Maria de Moraes Barros |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brachial plexus Nerve transfer Accessory nerve Shoulder |
topic |
Brachial plexus Nerve transfer Accessory nerve Shoulder |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: Nerve transfers are an alternative in the reconstruction of traumatic brachial plexus injuries. In this study, we report the results of branchial plexus reconstruction using accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer. Methods: Thirty-three patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries underwent surgical reconstruction with accessory to suprascapular nerve transfers. The patients were divided into groups in which surgery was performed either within 6 months after the injury or more than 6 months after the injury. Results were assessed using the Constant score. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to the Constant score. Conclusion: Accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer was not an efficient method for recovering active ROM or strength in the shoulder. However, it effectively improved pain control and shoulder stability. Level of evidence II, Retrospective Study. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522018000500332 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522018000500332 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1413-785220182605193532 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ATHA EDITORA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ATHA EDITORA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Ortopédica Brasileira v.26 n.5 2018 reponame:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) instacron:SBOT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
instacron_str |
SBOT |
institution |
SBOT |
reponame_str |
Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
1atha@uol.com.br||actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br |
_version_ |
1752122276092837888 |