Axillary nerve neurotization by a triceps motor branch: comparison between axillary and posterior arm approaches

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Jácome,Daniel Tôrres
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Alencar,Fernando Henrique Uchôa de, Lemos,Marcos Vinícius Vieira de, Kobig,Rudolf Nunes, Rocha,João Francisco Recalde
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162018000100015
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objectives: This study is aimed at comparing the functional outcome of axillary nerve neurotization by a triceps motor branch through the axillary approach and posterior arm approach. Methods: The study included 27 patients with post-traumatic brachial plexus injury treated with axillary nerve neurotization by a triceps motor branch for functional recovery of shoulder abduction and external rotation. The patients were retrospectively evaluated and two groups were identified, one with 13 patients undergoing axillary nerve neurotization by an axillary approach and the second with 14 patients using the posterior arm approach. Patients underwent assessment of muscle strength using the scale recommended by the British Medical Research Council, preoperatively and 18 months postoperatively, with useful function recovery considered as grade M3 or greater. Results: In the axillary approach group, 76.9% of patients achieved useful abduction function recovery and 69.2% achieved useful external rotation function recovery. In the group with posterior arm approach, 71.4% of patients achieved useful abduction function recovery and 50% achieved useful external rotation function recovery. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 1.000 for the British Medical Research Council abduction scale and p = 0.440 for external rotation). Conclusion: According to the British Medical Research Council grading, axillary nerve neurotization with a triceps motor branch using axillary approach or posterior arm approach shows no statistical differences.
id SBOT-2_531e02847daa8b746af8a30203335f13
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-36162018000100015
network_acronym_str SBOT-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Axillary nerve neurotization by a triceps motor branch: comparison between axillary and posterior arm approachesBrachial plexusAxillary nerveNerve transferNeurotizationShoulderABSTRACT Objectives: This study is aimed at comparing the functional outcome of axillary nerve neurotization by a triceps motor branch through the axillary approach and posterior arm approach. Methods: The study included 27 patients with post-traumatic brachial plexus injury treated with axillary nerve neurotization by a triceps motor branch for functional recovery of shoulder abduction and external rotation. The patients were retrospectively evaluated and two groups were identified, one with 13 patients undergoing axillary nerve neurotization by an axillary approach and the second with 14 patients using the posterior arm approach. Patients underwent assessment of muscle strength using the scale recommended by the British Medical Research Council, preoperatively and 18 months postoperatively, with useful function recovery considered as grade M3 or greater. Results: In the axillary approach group, 76.9% of patients achieved useful abduction function recovery and 69.2% achieved useful external rotation function recovery. In the group with posterior arm approach, 71.4% of patients achieved useful abduction function recovery and 50% achieved useful external rotation function recovery. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 1.000 for the British Medical Research Council abduction scale and p = 0.440 for external rotation). Conclusion: According to the British Medical Research Council grading, axillary nerve neurotization with a triceps motor branch using axillary approach or posterior arm approach shows no statistical differences.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2018-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162018000100015Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.53 n.1 2018reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rboe.2017.12.002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJácome,Daniel TôrresAlencar,Fernando Henrique Uchôa deLemos,Marcos Vinícius Vieira deKobig,Rudolf NunesRocha,João Francisco Recaldeeng2018-05-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162018000100015Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2018-05-02T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Axillary nerve neurotization by a triceps motor branch: comparison between axillary and posterior arm approaches
title Axillary nerve neurotization by a triceps motor branch: comparison between axillary and posterior arm approaches
spellingShingle Axillary nerve neurotization by a triceps motor branch: comparison between axillary and posterior arm approaches
Jácome,Daniel Tôrres
Brachial plexus
Axillary nerve
Nerve transfer
Neurotization
Shoulder
title_short Axillary nerve neurotization by a triceps motor branch: comparison between axillary and posterior arm approaches
title_full Axillary nerve neurotization by a triceps motor branch: comparison between axillary and posterior arm approaches
title_fullStr Axillary nerve neurotization by a triceps motor branch: comparison between axillary and posterior arm approaches
title_full_unstemmed Axillary nerve neurotization by a triceps motor branch: comparison between axillary and posterior arm approaches
title_sort Axillary nerve neurotization by a triceps motor branch: comparison between axillary and posterior arm approaches
author Jácome,Daniel Tôrres
author_facet Jácome,Daniel Tôrres
Alencar,Fernando Henrique Uchôa de
Lemos,Marcos Vinícius Vieira de
Kobig,Rudolf Nunes
Rocha,João Francisco Recalde
author_role author
author2 Alencar,Fernando Henrique Uchôa de
Lemos,Marcos Vinícius Vieira de
Kobig,Rudolf Nunes
Rocha,João Francisco Recalde
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jácome,Daniel Tôrres
Alencar,Fernando Henrique Uchôa de
Lemos,Marcos Vinícius Vieira de
Kobig,Rudolf Nunes
Rocha,João Francisco Recalde
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Brachial plexus
Axillary nerve
Nerve transfer
Neurotization
Shoulder
topic Brachial plexus
Axillary nerve
Nerve transfer
Neurotization
Shoulder
description ABSTRACT Objectives: This study is aimed at comparing the functional outcome of axillary nerve neurotization by a triceps motor branch through the axillary approach and posterior arm approach. Methods: The study included 27 patients with post-traumatic brachial plexus injury treated with axillary nerve neurotization by a triceps motor branch for functional recovery of shoulder abduction and external rotation. The patients were retrospectively evaluated and two groups were identified, one with 13 patients undergoing axillary nerve neurotization by an axillary approach and the second with 14 patients using the posterior arm approach. Patients underwent assessment of muscle strength using the scale recommended by the British Medical Research Council, preoperatively and 18 months postoperatively, with useful function recovery considered as grade M3 or greater. Results: In the axillary approach group, 76.9% of patients achieved useful abduction function recovery and 69.2% achieved useful external rotation function recovery. In the group with posterior arm approach, 71.4% of patients achieved useful abduction function recovery and 50% achieved useful external rotation function recovery. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 1.000 for the British Medical Research Council abduction scale and p = 0.440 for external rotation). Conclusion: According to the British Medical Research Council grading, axillary nerve neurotization with a triceps motor branch using axillary approach or posterior arm approach shows no statistical differences.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162018000100015
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162018000100015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.12.002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.53 n.1 2018
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbo@sbot.org.br
_version_ 1752122361000230912