Reliability of the radiographic union scale in tibial fractures (RUST)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000100035 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the inter- and intra observer reproducibility of the radiographic score of consolidation of the tibia shaft fractures. METHODS: Fifty-one sets of radiographs in anteroposterior (AP) and profile (P) of the tibial shaft treated with intramedullary nail were obtained. The analysis of X-rays was performed in two stages, with a 21-day interval between assessments by a group of nine evaluators. To evaluate the reproducibility of RUST score between the evaluators, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval was used. ICC values range from +1, representing perfect agreement, to -1, complete disagreement. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation among all evaluators: ICC = 0.87 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.91). The intraobserver agreement proved to be substantial with ICC = 0.88 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.91) . CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the RUST scale shows a high degree of reliability and agreement. |
id |
SBOT-2_2d257827760ad757bc06366a25713c2c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-36162017000100035 |
network_acronym_str |
SBOT-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reliability of the radiographic union scale in tibial fractures (RUST)TibiaFracture healingRadiographyABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the inter- and intra observer reproducibility of the radiographic score of consolidation of the tibia shaft fractures. METHODS: Fifty-one sets of radiographs in anteroposterior (AP) and profile (P) of the tibial shaft treated with intramedullary nail were obtained. The analysis of X-rays was performed in two stages, with a 21-day interval between assessments by a group of nine evaluators. To evaluate the reproducibility of RUST score between the evaluators, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval was used. ICC values range from +1, representing perfect agreement, to -1, complete disagreement. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation among all evaluators: ICC = 0.87 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.91). The intraobserver agreement proved to be substantial with ICC = 0.88 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.91) . CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the RUST scale shows a high degree of reliability and agreement.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2017-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000100035Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 n.1 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rboe.2016.05.006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAzevedo Filho,Fernando Antonio Silva deCotias,Ricardo BrittoAzi,Matheus LemosTeixeira,Armando Augusto de Almeidaeng2017-03-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162017000100035Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2017-03-06T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reliability of the radiographic union scale in tibial fractures (RUST) |
title |
Reliability of the radiographic union scale in tibial fractures (RUST) |
spellingShingle |
Reliability of the radiographic union scale in tibial fractures (RUST) Azevedo Filho,Fernando Antonio Silva de Tibia Fracture healing Radiography |
title_short |
Reliability of the radiographic union scale in tibial fractures (RUST) |
title_full |
Reliability of the radiographic union scale in tibial fractures (RUST) |
title_fullStr |
Reliability of the radiographic union scale in tibial fractures (RUST) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reliability of the radiographic union scale in tibial fractures (RUST) |
title_sort |
Reliability of the radiographic union scale in tibial fractures (RUST) |
author |
Azevedo Filho,Fernando Antonio Silva de |
author_facet |
Azevedo Filho,Fernando Antonio Silva de Cotias,Ricardo Britto Azi,Matheus Lemos Teixeira,Armando Augusto de Almeida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cotias,Ricardo Britto Azi,Matheus Lemos Teixeira,Armando Augusto de Almeida |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Azevedo Filho,Fernando Antonio Silva de Cotias,Ricardo Britto Azi,Matheus Lemos Teixeira,Armando Augusto de Almeida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Tibia Fracture healing Radiography |
topic |
Tibia Fracture healing Radiography |
description |
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the inter- and intra observer reproducibility of the radiographic score of consolidation of the tibia shaft fractures. METHODS: Fifty-one sets of radiographs in anteroposterior (AP) and profile (P) of the tibial shaft treated with intramedullary nail were obtained. The analysis of X-rays was performed in two stages, with a 21-day interval between assessments by a group of nine evaluators. To evaluate the reproducibility of RUST score between the evaluators, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval was used. ICC values range from +1, representing perfect agreement, to -1, complete disagreement. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation among all evaluators: ICC = 0.87 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.91). The intraobserver agreement proved to be substantial with ICC = 0.88 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.91) . CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the RUST scale shows a high degree of reliability and agreement. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000100035 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000100035 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.rboe.2016.05.006 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 n.1 2017 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) instacron:SBOT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
instacron_str |
SBOT |
institution |
SBOT |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbo@sbot.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122360529420288 |