Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000400459 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective To evaluate the interobserver agreement of two classifications for floating knee: Fraser and Blake & McBryde. Method Thirty-two observers, subdivided according to the degree of titration (26 resident physicians and 6 orthopedic physicians specialized in orthopedic trauma), classified 15 fractures of the ipsilateral femur and tibia. Interobserver agreement was evaluated by using the Kappa coefficient. Result When evaluating the agreement between the 9 R1, a Kappa index of 0.58 was obtained for the Fraser classification and of 0.46 for the Blake & McBryde classification. Among the 7 R2, a rate of 0.59 was obtained for the Fraser rating and 0.51 for the Blake & McBryderating. Among the 10 R3, theagreement index was higher for both classifications: 0.72 for the Fraser and 0.71 for the Blake & McBryde classification. Considering the 3 groups (R1, R2, R3) as one large group, the general Kappa index was calculated, which resulted in 0.63for the Fraser classification and 0.56 for the Blake & McBryde classification. In the group of traumaand orthopedic knee specialists, in turn, an agreement of 0.597 was obtained for the Blake and McBryde classification and of 0.843 for the Fraser classification. Conclusion Comparatively, the two classifications presented a weak to moderate degree of agreement. Fraser classification had better agreement in both groups. The agreement was higher when evaluating orthopedic trauma physicians. |
id |
SBOT-2_4a501be9941ce35fb3931c11202676a5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-36162021000400459 |
network_acronym_str |
SBOT-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Kneetibia fractures/ classificationvalidation studiesevaluationAbstract Objective To evaluate the interobserver agreement of two classifications for floating knee: Fraser and Blake & McBryde. Method Thirty-two observers, subdivided according to the degree of titration (26 resident physicians and 6 orthopedic physicians specialized in orthopedic trauma), classified 15 fractures of the ipsilateral femur and tibia. Interobserver agreement was evaluated by using the Kappa coefficient. Result When evaluating the agreement between the 9 R1, a Kappa index of 0.58 was obtained for the Fraser classification and of 0.46 for the Blake & McBryde classification. Among the 7 R2, a rate of 0.59 was obtained for the Fraser rating and 0.51 for the Blake & McBryderating. Among the 10 R3, theagreement index was higher for both classifications: 0.72 for the Fraser and 0.71 for the Blake & McBryde classification. Considering the 3 groups (R1, R2, R3) as one large group, the general Kappa index was calculated, which resulted in 0.63for the Fraser classification and 0.56 for the Blake & McBryde classification. In the group of traumaand orthopedic knee specialists, in turn, an agreement of 0.597 was obtained for the Blake and McBryde classification and of 0.843 for the Fraser classification. Conclusion Comparatively, the two classifications presented a weak to moderate degree of agreement. Fraser classification had better agreement in both groups. The agreement was higher when evaluating orthopedic trauma physicians.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2021-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000400459Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.56 n.4 2021reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1055/s-0040-1713388info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlencar Neto,Jonatas BritoOsório Neto,Ernane BrunoSouza,Clodoaldo José Duarte deRocha,Pedro Henrique Messias daCavalcante,Maria Luzete CostaLopes,Márcio Bezerra Gadelhaeng2021-10-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162021000400459Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2021-10-06T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee |
title |
Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee Alencar Neto,Jonatas Brito tibia fractures/ classification validation studies evaluation |
title_short |
Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee |
title_full |
Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee |
author |
Alencar Neto,Jonatas Brito |
author_facet |
Alencar Neto,Jonatas Brito Osório Neto,Ernane Bruno Souza,Clodoaldo José Duarte de Rocha,Pedro Henrique Messias da Cavalcante,Maria Luzete Costa Lopes,Márcio Bezerra Gadelha |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Osório Neto,Ernane Bruno Souza,Clodoaldo José Duarte de Rocha,Pedro Henrique Messias da Cavalcante,Maria Luzete Costa Lopes,Márcio Bezerra Gadelha |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alencar Neto,Jonatas Brito Osório Neto,Ernane Bruno Souza,Clodoaldo José Duarte de Rocha,Pedro Henrique Messias da Cavalcante,Maria Luzete Costa Lopes,Márcio Bezerra Gadelha |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
tibia fractures/ classification validation studies evaluation |
topic |
tibia fractures/ classification validation studies evaluation |
description |
Abstract Objective To evaluate the interobserver agreement of two classifications for floating knee: Fraser and Blake & McBryde. Method Thirty-two observers, subdivided according to the degree of titration (26 resident physicians and 6 orthopedic physicians specialized in orthopedic trauma), classified 15 fractures of the ipsilateral femur and tibia. Interobserver agreement was evaluated by using the Kappa coefficient. Result When evaluating the agreement between the 9 R1, a Kappa index of 0.58 was obtained for the Fraser classification and of 0.46 for the Blake & McBryde classification. Among the 7 R2, a rate of 0.59 was obtained for the Fraser rating and 0.51 for the Blake & McBryderating. Among the 10 R3, theagreement index was higher for both classifications: 0.72 for the Fraser and 0.71 for the Blake & McBryde classification. Considering the 3 groups (R1, R2, R3) as one large group, the general Kappa index was calculated, which resulted in 0.63for the Fraser classification and 0.56 for the Blake & McBryde classification. In the group of traumaand orthopedic knee specialists, in turn, an agreement of 0.597 was obtained for the Blake and McBryde classification and of 0.843 for the Fraser classification. Conclusion Comparatively, the two classifications presented a weak to moderate degree of agreement. Fraser classification had better agreement in both groups. The agreement was higher when evaluating orthopedic trauma physicians. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000400459 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000400459 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1055/s-0040-1713388 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.56 n.4 2021 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) instacron:SBOT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
instacron_str |
SBOT |
institution |
SBOT |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbo@sbot.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122363160297472 |