Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5 to 6 of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rezende,Fernando Cury
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Ferreira,Marcio de Castro, Debieux,Pedro, Franciozi,Carlos Eduardo da Silveira, Luzo,Marcus Vinicius Malheiros, Carneiro,Mario
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162013000500421
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a safe distal femoral resection angle to restore the normal axial alignment of the limb in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the Brazilian geriatric population with knee arthrosis. METHOD: This study analyzed 99 pre-operative hip-knee-ankle radiographs of osteoarthritic knees of 66 patients (54 women, 12 men) with knee osteoarthritis. The distal femoral cut angle was determined based on the femoral mechanical-anatomical angle (FMA). Mean, median and standard deviation measurements of the distal femoral cut angle were calculated, differentiated by gender and side. The mean result of the distal femoral resection angle was compared to 5.7°, the mean average angle of previous and similar study based on European population of patients with knee arthrosis. RESULTS: The mean average of the distal femoral resection angle of the study was 6.05 (range 3-9°). The distribution of this angle between genders showed a slight superior average of the male population (6.17°) compared to the female (6.02°), but with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.726). There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.052) between the mean average of this study (6.05°) compared to the mean average of the literature (5.7°). However, considering 3° as the limit of acceptable error in the coronal plane, this empirical femoral resection angle would not be appropriated for 19.7% of the population. CONCLUSION: The distal femoral resection angle of 5-6° is not completely safe for the Brazilian geriatric population.
id SBOT-2_7b1bdd17f7df31326b143e4b90909dac
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-36162013000500421
network_acronym_str SBOT-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5 to 6 of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?Knee jointArthroplasty knee replacementOstearthritisPanoramic radiography OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a safe distal femoral resection angle to restore the normal axial alignment of the limb in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the Brazilian geriatric population with knee arthrosis. METHOD: This study analyzed 99 pre-operative hip-knee-ankle radiographs of osteoarthritic knees of 66 patients (54 women, 12 men) with knee osteoarthritis. The distal femoral cut angle was determined based on the femoral mechanical-anatomical angle (FMA). Mean, median and standard deviation measurements of the distal femoral cut angle were calculated, differentiated by gender and side. The mean result of the distal femoral resection angle was compared to 5.7°, the mean average angle of previous and similar study based on European population of patients with knee arthrosis. RESULTS: The mean average of the distal femoral resection angle of the study was 6.05 (range 3-9°). The distribution of this angle between genders showed a slight superior average of the male population (6.17°) compared to the female (6.02°), but with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.726). There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.052) between the mean average of this study (6.05°) compared to the mean average of the literature (5.7°). However, considering 3° as the limit of acceptable error in the coronal plane, this empirical femoral resection angle would not be appropriated for 19.7% of the population. CONCLUSION: The distal femoral resection angle of 5-6° is not completely safe for the Brazilian geriatric population. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2013-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162013000500421Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.48 n.5 2013reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rboe.2012.08.009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRezende,Fernando CuryFerreira,Marcio de CastroDebieux,PedroFranciozi,Carlos Eduardo da SilveiraLuzo,Marcus Vinicius MalheirosCarneiro,Marioeng2014-02-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162013000500421Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2014-02-25T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5 to 6 of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?
title Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5 to 6 of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?
spellingShingle Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5 to 6 of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?
Rezende,Fernando Cury
Knee joint
Arthroplasty knee replacement
Ostearthritis
Panoramic radiography
title_short Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5 to 6 of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?
title_full Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5 to 6 of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?
title_fullStr Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5 to 6 of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?
title_full_unstemmed Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5 to 6 of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?
title_sort Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5 to 6 of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?
author Rezende,Fernando Cury
author_facet Rezende,Fernando Cury
Ferreira,Marcio de Castro
Debieux,Pedro
Franciozi,Carlos Eduardo da Silveira
Luzo,Marcus Vinicius Malheiros
Carneiro,Mario
author_role author
author2 Ferreira,Marcio de Castro
Debieux,Pedro
Franciozi,Carlos Eduardo da Silveira
Luzo,Marcus Vinicius Malheiros
Carneiro,Mario
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rezende,Fernando Cury
Ferreira,Marcio de Castro
Debieux,Pedro
Franciozi,Carlos Eduardo da Silveira
Luzo,Marcus Vinicius Malheiros
Carneiro,Mario
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Knee joint
Arthroplasty knee replacement
Ostearthritis
Panoramic radiography
topic Knee joint
Arthroplasty knee replacement
Ostearthritis
Panoramic radiography
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a safe distal femoral resection angle to restore the normal axial alignment of the limb in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the Brazilian geriatric population with knee arthrosis. METHOD: This study analyzed 99 pre-operative hip-knee-ankle radiographs of osteoarthritic knees of 66 patients (54 women, 12 men) with knee osteoarthritis. The distal femoral cut angle was determined based on the femoral mechanical-anatomical angle (FMA). Mean, median and standard deviation measurements of the distal femoral cut angle were calculated, differentiated by gender and side. The mean result of the distal femoral resection angle was compared to 5.7°, the mean average angle of previous and similar study based on European population of patients with knee arthrosis. RESULTS: The mean average of the distal femoral resection angle of the study was 6.05 (range 3-9°). The distribution of this angle between genders showed a slight superior average of the male population (6.17°) compared to the female (6.02°), but with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.726). There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.052) between the mean average of this study (6.05°) compared to the mean average of the literature (5.7°). However, considering 3° as the limit of acceptable error in the coronal plane, this empirical femoral resection angle would not be appropriated for 19.7% of the population. CONCLUSION: The distal femoral resection angle of 5-6° is not completely safe for the Brazilian geriatric population.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162013000500421
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162013000500421
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.rboe.2012.08.009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.48 n.5 2013
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbo@sbot.org.br
_version_ 1752122358779346944