Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000700052 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective To evaluate, through biomechanical testing, the resistance to and energy required for the occurrence of proximal femoral fracture in synthetic bone after removal of a proximal femoral nail model (PFN), comparing the results obtained with a reinforcement technique using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Methods Fifteen synthetic bones were used: five units for the control group (CG), five for the test group without reinforcement (TGNR), and five for the test group with reinforcement (TGR). The biomechanical analysis was performed simulating a fall on the trochanter using a servo-hydraulic machine. In the GC, the assay was performed with the PFN intact. In the TGNR and TGR groups, a model of PFN was introduced and the tests were performed in the TGNR, after simple removal of the synthesis material, and in the TGR, after removal of the same PFN model and filling of the cavity in the femoral neck with PMMA. Results All groups presented a basicervical fracture. The CG presented a mean of 1427.39 Newtons (N) of maximum load and 10.14 Joules (J) of energy for the occurrence of the fracture. The TGNR and TGR presented 892.14 N and 1477.80 N of maximum load, and 6.71 J and 11.99 J of energy, respectively. According to the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, there was a significant difference in the maximum load (p = 0.009) and energy (p = 0.007) between these groups. Conclusion The simple removal of a PFN in synthetic bone showed a significant reduction of the maximum load and energy for the occurrence of fracture, which were re-established with a reinforcement technique using PMMA. |
id |
SBOT-2_be75abec5f72e848f2169256aea05710 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-36162017000700052 |
network_acronym_str |
SBOT-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysisHipHip fracturesOsteoporosisPolymethylmethacrylateAbstract Objective To evaluate, through biomechanical testing, the resistance to and energy required for the occurrence of proximal femoral fracture in synthetic bone after removal of a proximal femoral nail model (PFN), comparing the results obtained with a reinforcement technique using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Methods Fifteen synthetic bones were used: five units for the control group (CG), five for the test group without reinforcement (TGNR), and five for the test group with reinforcement (TGR). The biomechanical analysis was performed simulating a fall on the trochanter using a servo-hydraulic machine. In the GC, the assay was performed with the PFN intact. In the TGNR and TGR groups, a model of PFN was introduced and the tests were performed in the TGNR, after simple removal of the synthesis material, and in the TGR, after removal of the same PFN model and filling of the cavity in the femoral neck with PMMA. Results All groups presented a basicervical fracture. The CG presented a mean of 1427.39 Newtons (N) of maximum load and 10.14 Joules (J) of energy for the occurrence of the fracture. The TGNR and TGR presented 892.14 N and 1477.80 N of maximum load, and 6.71 J and 11.99 J of energy, respectively. According to the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, there was a significant difference in the maximum load (p = 0.009) and energy (p = 0.007) between these groups. Conclusion The simple removal of a PFN in synthetic bone showed a significant reduction of the maximum load and energy for the occurrence of fracture, which were re-established with a reinforcement technique using PMMA.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000700052Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 suppl.1 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rboe.2017.01.008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaiva,Leonardo MoraisMacedo Neto,Sílvio Leite deSouto,Diogo Ranier de MacedoFerreira,George Neri BarrosCosta,Hélio Ismael daFreitas,Andersoneng2017-10-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162017000700052Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2017-10-27T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis |
title |
Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis |
spellingShingle |
Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis Paiva,Leonardo Morais Hip Hip fractures Osteoporosis Polymethylmethacrylate |
title_short |
Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis |
title_full |
Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis |
title_fullStr |
Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis |
title_sort |
Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis |
author |
Paiva,Leonardo Morais |
author_facet |
Paiva,Leonardo Morais Macedo Neto,Sílvio Leite de Souto,Diogo Ranier de Macedo Ferreira,George Neri Barros Costa,Hélio Ismael da Freitas,Anderson |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Macedo Neto,Sílvio Leite de Souto,Diogo Ranier de Macedo Ferreira,George Neri Barros Costa,Hélio Ismael da Freitas,Anderson |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paiva,Leonardo Morais Macedo Neto,Sílvio Leite de Souto,Diogo Ranier de Macedo Ferreira,George Neri Barros Costa,Hélio Ismael da Freitas,Anderson |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hip Hip fractures Osteoporosis Polymethylmethacrylate |
topic |
Hip Hip fractures Osteoporosis Polymethylmethacrylate |
description |
Abstract Objective To evaluate, through biomechanical testing, the resistance to and energy required for the occurrence of proximal femoral fracture in synthetic bone after removal of a proximal femoral nail model (PFN), comparing the results obtained with a reinforcement technique using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Methods Fifteen synthetic bones were used: five units for the control group (CG), five for the test group without reinforcement (TGNR), and five for the test group with reinforcement (TGR). The biomechanical analysis was performed simulating a fall on the trochanter using a servo-hydraulic machine. In the GC, the assay was performed with the PFN intact. In the TGNR and TGR groups, a model of PFN was introduced and the tests were performed in the TGNR, after simple removal of the synthesis material, and in the TGR, after removal of the same PFN model and filling of the cavity in the femoral neck with PMMA. Results All groups presented a basicervical fracture. The CG presented a mean of 1427.39 Newtons (N) of maximum load and 10.14 Joules (J) of energy for the occurrence of the fracture. The TGNR and TGR presented 892.14 N and 1477.80 N of maximum load, and 6.71 J and 11.99 J of energy, respectively. According to the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, there was a significant difference in the maximum load (p = 0.009) and energy (p = 0.007) between these groups. Conclusion The simple removal of a PFN in synthetic bone showed a significant reduction of the maximum load and energy for the occurrence of fracture, which were re-established with a reinforcement technique using PMMA. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000700052 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000700052 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.rboe.2017.01.008 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 suppl.1 2017 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) instacron:SBOT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
instacron_str |
SBOT |
institution |
SBOT |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbo@sbot.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122360990793728 |