Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paiva,Leonardo Morais
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Macedo Neto,Sílvio Leite de, Souto,Diogo Ranier de Macedo, Ferreira,George Neri Barros, Costa,Hélio Ismael da, Freitas,Anderson
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000700052
Resumo: Abstract Objective To evaluate, through biomechanical testing, the resistance to and energy required for the occurrence of proximal femoral fracture in synthetic bone after removal of a proximal femoral nail model (PFN), comparing the results obtained with a reinforcement technique using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Methods Fifteen synthetic bones were used: five units for the control group (CG), five for the test group without reinforcement (TGNR), and five for the test group with reinforcement (TGR). The biomechanical analysis was performed simulating a fall on the trochanter using a servo-hydraulic machine. In the GC, the assay was performed with the PFN intact. In the TGNR and TGR groups, a model of PFN was introduced and the tests were performed in the TGNR, after simple removal of the synthesis material, and in the TGR, after removal of the same PFN model and filling of the cavity in the femoral neck with PMMA. Results All groups presented a basicervical fracture. The CG presented a mean of 1427.39 Newtons (N) of maximum load and 10.14 Joules (J) of energy for the occurrence of the fracture. The TGNR and TGR presented 892.14 N and 1477.80 N of maximum load, and 6.71 J and 11.99 J of energy, respectively. According to the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, there was a significant difference in the maximum load (p = 0.009) and energy (p = 0.007) between these groups. Conclusion The simple removal of a PFN in synthetic bone showed a significant reduction of the maximum load and energy for the occurrence of fracture, which were re-established with a reinforcement technique using PMMA.
id SBOT-2_be75abec5f72e848f2169256aea05710
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-36162017000700052
network_acronym_str SBOT-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysisHipHip fracturesOsteoporosisPolymethylmethacrylateAbstract Objective To evaluate, through biomechanical testing, the resistance to and energy required for the occurrence of proximal femoral fracture in synthetic bone after removal of a proximal femoral nail model (PFN), comparing the results obtained with a reinforcement technique using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Methods Fifteen synthetic bones were used: five units for the control group (CG), five for the test group without reinforcement (TGNR), and five for the test group with reinforcement (TGR). The biomechanical analysis was performed simulating a fall on the trochanter using a servo-hydraulic machine. In the GC, the assay was performed with the PFN intact. In the TGNR and TGR groups, a model of PFN was introduced and the tests were performed in the TGNR, after simple removal of the synthesis material, and in the TGR, after removal of the same PFN model and filling of the cavity in the femoral neck with PMMA. Results All groups presented a basicervical fracture. The CG presented a mean of 1427.39 Newtons (N) of maximum load and 10.14 Joules (J) of energy for the occurrence of the fracture. The TGNR and TGR presented 892.14 N and 1477.80 N of maximum load, and 6.71 J and 11.99 J of energy, respectively. According to the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, there was a significant difference in the maximum load (p = 0.009) and energy (p = 0.007) between these groups. Conclusion The simple removal of a PFN in synthetic bone showed a significant reduction of the maximum load and energy for the occurrence of fracture, which were re-established with a reinforcement technique using PMMA.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000700052Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 suppl.1 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rboe.2017.01.008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaiva,Leonardo MoraisMacedo Neto,Sílvio Leite deSouto,Diogo Ranier de MacedoFerreira,George Neri BarrosCosta,Hélio Ismael daFreitas,Andersoneng2017-10-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162017000700052Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2017-10-27T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis
title Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis
spellingShingle Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis
Paiva,Leonardo Morais
Hip
Hip fractures
Osteoporosis
Polymethylmethacrylate
title_short Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis
title_full Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis
title_fullStr Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis
title_full_unstemmed Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis
title_sort Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis
author Paiva,Leonardo Morais
author_facet Paiva,Leonardo Morais
Macedo Neto,Sílvio Leite de
Souto,Diogo Ranier de Macedo
Ferreira,George Neri Barros
Costa,Hélio Ismael da
Freitas,Anderson
author_role author
author2 Macedo Neto,Sílvio Leite de
Souto,Diogo Ranier de Macedo
Ferreira,George Neri Barros
Costa,Hélio Ismael da
Freitas,Anderson
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paiva,Leonardo Morais
Macedo Neto,Sílvio Leite de
Souto,Diogo Ranier de Macedo
Ferreira,George Neri Barros
Costa,Hélio Ismael da
Freitas,Anderson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hip
Hip fractures
Osteoporosis
Polymethylmethacrylate
topic Hip
Hip fractures
Osteoporosis
Polymethylmethacrylate
description Abstract Objective To evaluate, through biomechanical testing, the resistance to and energy required for the occurrence of proximal femoral fracture in synthetic bone after removal of a proximal femoral nail model (PFN), comparing the results obtained with a reinforcement technique using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Methods Fifteen synthetic bones were used: five units for the control group (CG), five for the test group without reinforcement (TGNR), and five for the test group with reinforcement (TGR). The biomechanical analysis was performed simulating a fall on the trochanter using a servo-hydraulic machine. In the GC, the assay was performed with the PFN intact. In the TGNR and TGR groups, a model of PFN was introduced and the tests were performed in the TGNR, after simple removal of the synthesis material, and in the TGR, after removal of the same PFN model and filling of the cavity in the femoral neck with PMMA. Results All groups presented a basicervical fracture. The CG presented a mean of 1427.39 Newtons (N) of maximum load and 10.14 Joules (J) of energy for the occurrence of the fracture. The TGNR and TGR presented 892.14 N and 1477.80 N of maximum load, and 6.71 J and 11.99 J of energy, respectively. According to the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, there was a significant difference in the maximum load (p = 0.009) and energy (p = 0.007) between these groups. Conclusion The simple removal of a PFN in synthetic bone showed a significant reduction of the maximum load and energy for the occurrence of fracture, which were re-established with a reinforcement technique using PMMA.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000700052
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000700052
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.01.008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 suppl.1 2017
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbo@sbot.org.br
_version_ 1752122360990793728