Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues,Ana Sofia Teles
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Gutierres,Manuel António Pereira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000300242
Resumo: ABSTRACT Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a surgical procedure of paramount relevance that restores a substantial degree of function in arthritic knees. Increased consideration has been given to the influence of limb alignment on longevity after TKA, as errors in component placement can be associated with inferior function and compromised long-term performance. Consequently, numerous studies comparing patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) to standard instruments (SI) have been published. Patient-specific approaches use preoperative imaging to create specific materials for each patient's anatomy and were designed to achieve a higher rate of success in TKA, causing the entire procedure to be more efficient and cost-effective. However, it is not clear to what degree these studies support the potential advantages of PSI. Thus, the present study aimed to review the current evidence comparing PSI to SI, concerning alignment, cost-effectiveness, and postoperative functional evaluation.
id SBOT-2_fb4f329c882aa8918b2930720c3ec0b4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-36162017000300242
network_acronym_str SBOT-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it?ArthroplastyReplacementKnee/instrumentationPatient-specific modelingKnee prosthesisProsthesis designABSTRACT Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a surgical procedure of paramount relevance that restores a substantial degree of function in arthritic knees. Increased consideration has been given to the influence of limb alignment on longevity after TKA, as errors in component placement can be associated with inferior function and compromised long-term performance. Consequently, numerous studies comparing patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) to standard instruments (SI) have been published. Patient-specific approaches use preoperative imaging to create specific materials for each patient's anatomy and were designed to achieve a higher rate of success in TKA, causing the entire procedure to be more efficient and cost-effective. However, it is not clear to what degree these studies support the potential advantages of PSI. Thus, the present study aimed to review the current evidence comparing PSI to SI, concerning alignment, cost-effectiveness, and postoperative functional evaluation.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2017-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000300242Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 n.3 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rboe.2016.06.008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues,Ana Sofia TelesGutierres,Manuel António Pereiraeng2017-07-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162017000300242Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2017-07-24T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it?
title Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it?
spellingShingle Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it?
Rodrigues,Ana Sofia Teles
Arthroplasty
Replacement
Knee/instrumentation
Patient-specific modeling
Knee prosthesis
Prosthesis design
title_short Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it?
title_full Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it?
title_fullStr Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it?
title_full_unstemmed Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it?
title_sort Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it?
author Rodrigues,Ana Sofia Teles
author_facet Rodrigues,Ana Sofia Teles
Gutierres,Manuel António Pereira
author_role author
author2 Gutierres,Manuel António Pereira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues,Ana Sofia Teles
Gutierres,Manuel António Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arthroplasty
Replacement
Knee/instrumentation
Patient-specific modeling
Knee prosthesis
Prosthesis design
topic Arthroplasty
Replacement
Knee/instrumentation
Patient-specific modeling
Knee prosthesis
Prosthesis design
description ABSTRACT Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a surgical procedure of paramount relevance that restores a substantial degree of function in arthritic knees. Increased consideration has been given to the influence of limb alignment on longevity after TKA, as errors in component placement can be associated with inferior function and compromised long-term performance. Consequently, numerous studies comparing patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) to standard instruments (SI) have been published. Patient-specific approaches use preoperative imaging to create specific materials for each patient's anatomy and were designed to achieve a higher rate of success in TKA, causing the entire procedure to be more efficient and cost-effective. However, it is not clear to what degree these studies support the potential advantages of PSI. Thus, the present study aimed to review the current evidence comparing PSI to SI, concerning alignment, cost-effectiveness, and postoperative functional evaluation.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000300242
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000300242
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.06.008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 n.3 2017
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbo@sbot.org.br
_version_ 1752122360845041664