Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000300242 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a surgical procedure of paramount relevance that restores a substantial degree of function in arthritic knees. Increased consideration has been given to the influence of limb alignment on longevity after TKA, as errors in component placement can be associated with inferior function and compromised long-term performance. Consequently, numerous studies comparing patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) to standard instruments (SI) have been published. Patient-specific approaches use preoperative imaging to create specific materials for each patient's anatomy and were designed to achieve a higher rate of success in TKA, causing the entire procedure to be more efficient and cost-effective. However, it is not clear to what degree these studies support the potential advantages of PSI. Thus, the present study aimed to review the current evidence comparing PSI to SI, concerning alignment, cost-effectiveness, and postoperative functional evaluation. |
id |
SBOT-2_fb4f329c882aa8918b2930720c3ec0b4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-36162017000300242 |
network_acronym_str |
SBOT-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it?ArthroplastyReplacementKnee/instrumentationPatient-specific modelingKnee prosthesisProsthesis designABSTRACT Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a surgical procedure of paramount relevance that restores a substantial degree of function in arthritic knees. Increased consideration has been given to the influence of limb alignment on longevity after TKA, as errors in component placement can be associated with inferior function and compromised long-term performance. Consequently, numerous studies comparing patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) to standard instruments (SI) have been published. Patient-specific approaches use preoperative imaging to create specific materials for each patient's anatomy and were designed to achieve a higher rate of success in TKA, causing the entire procedure to be more efficient and cost-effective. However, it is not clear to what degree these studies support the potential advantages of PSI. Thus, the present study aimed to review the current evidence comparing PSI to SI, concerning alignment, cost-effectiveness, and postoperative functional evaluation.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2017-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000300242Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 n.3 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rboe.2016.06.008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues,Ana Sofia TelesGutierres,Manuel António Pereiraeng2017-07-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162017000300242Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2017-07-24T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it? |
title |
Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it? |
spellingShingle |
Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it? Rodrigues,Ana Sofia Teles Arthroplasty Replacement Knee/instrumentation Patient-specific modeling Knee prosthesis Prosthesis design |
title_short |
Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it? |
title_full |
Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it? |
title_fullStr |
Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it? |
title_sort |
Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it? |
author |
Rodrigues,Ana Sofia Teles |
author_facet |
Rodrigues,Ana Sofia Teles Gutierres,Manuel António Pereira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gutierres,Manuel António Pereira |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues,Ana Sofia Teles Gutierres,Manuel António Pereira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Arthroplasty Replacement Knee/instrumentation Patient-specific modeling Knee prosthesis Prosthesis design |
topic |
Arthroplasty Replacement Knee/instrumentation Patient-specific modeling Knee prosthesis Prosthesis design |
description |
ABSTRACT Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a surgical procedure of paramount relevance that restores a substantial degree of function in arthritic knees. Increased consideration has been given to the influence of limb alignment on longevity after TKA, as errors in component placement can be associated with inferior function and compromised long-term performance. Consequently, numerous studies comparing patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) to standard instruments (SI) have been published. Patient-specific approaches use preoperative imaging to create specific materials for each patient's anatomy and were designed to achieve a higher rate of success in TKA, causing the entire procedure to be more efficient and cost-effective. However, it is not clear to what degree these studies support the potential advantages of PSI. Thus, the present study aimed to review the current evidence comparing PSI to SI, concerning alignment, cost-effectiveness, and postoperative functional evaluation. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000300242 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000300242 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.rboe.2016.06.008 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 n.3 2017 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) instacron:SBOT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
instacron_str |
SBOT |
institution |
SBOT |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbo@sbot.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122360845041664 |