Mucins and NCAM (CD56) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinogenesis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Esperança,Anna Beatriz Telles
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Camacho,Aline Helen da Silva, Monteiro,Juliana Bigi Maya, Monteiro,Geysa Bigi Maya, Caroli-Bottino,Adriana, Pannain,Vera Lucia Nunes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442014000300216
Resumo: Introduction: Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common malignant neoplasm of the hepatobiliary system. During cholangiocarcinogenesis phenotypic changes occur in the ductal epithelium, including the expression of mucins (MUC). However, the evaluating studies of the expression of mucins in the different stages of cholangiocarcinogenesis are scarce. CD56 has also contributed in differentiating benign ductal proliferation and cholangiocarcinoma; however, its expression has not been evaluated in dysplastic epithelium of the bile duct yet. Objective: To assess immunohistochemical profile of (MUC) 1, 2, 5, 6, and CD56 in cholangiocarcinoma, pre-neoplastic and reactive lesions in the epithelium of intrahepatic bile ducts. Material and methods: Immunohistochemical expression of MUC 1, 2, 5, 6, and CD56 were studied for 11 cases of cholangiocarcinoma and 83 intrahepatic bile ducts (67 reactive and 16 dysplastic). Variables were considered significant when p < 0.05. Results: The expression of MUC1 occurred in about 90% of the cholangiocarcinomas, contrasting with the low frequency of positive cases in reactive and dysplastic bile ducts (p < 0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the expression of MUC5, MUC6 and CD56 between the reactive or dysplastic lesions and cholangiocarcinoma. The anti-MUC2 antibody was negative in all cases. Conclusions: MUC1 contributed for the differential diagnosis between cholangiocarcinoma and pre-neoplastic and reactive/regenerative lesions of intrahepatic bile ducts, and it should compose the antibodies panel aiming at improvement of these differential diagnoses. In contrast, MUC2, MUC5, MUC6 and CD56 were not promising in differentiating all the phases of cholangiocarcinogenesis.
id SBP-1_12e1fce7d9c0eb189a35f9aca03e9224
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1676-24442014000300216
network_acronym_str SBP-1
network_name_str Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Mucins and NCAM (CD56) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinogenesischolangiocarcinomadysplasiaintrahepatic bile ductsmucinsCD56 Introduction: Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common malignant neoplasm of the hepatobiliary system. During cholangiocarcinogenesis phenotypic changes occur in the ductal epithelium, including the expression of mucins (MUC). However, the evaluating studies of the expression of mucins in the different stages of cholangiocarcinogenesis are scarce. CD56 has also contributed in differentiating benign ductal proliferation and cholangiocarcinoma; however, its expression has not been evaluated in dysplastic epithelium of the bile duct yet. Objective: To assess immunohistochemical profile of (MUC) 1, 2, 5, 6, and CD56 in cholangiocarcinoma, pre-neoplastic and reactive lesions in the epithelium of intrahepatic bile ducts. Material and methods: Immunohistochemical expression of MUC 1, 2, 5, 6, and CD56 were studied for 11 cases of cholangiocarcinoma and 83 intrahepatic bile ducts (67 reactive and 16 dysplastic). Variables were considered significant when p < 0.05. Results: The expression of MUC1 occurred in about 90% of the cholangiocarcinomas, contrasting with the low frequency of positive cases in reactive and dysplastic bile ducts (p < 0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the expression of MUC5, MUC6 and CD56 between the reactive or dysplastic lesions and cholangiocarcinoma. The anti-MUC2 antibody was negative in all cases. Conclusions: MUC1 contributed for the differential diagnosis between cholangiocarcinoma and pre-neoplastic and reactive/regenerative lesions of intrahepatic bile ducts, and it should compose the antibodies panel aiming at improvement of these differential diagnoses. In contrast, MUC2, MUC5, MUC6 and CD56 were not promising in differentiating all the phases of cholangiocarcinogenesis. Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica2014-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442014000300216Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial v.50 n.3 2014reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)instacron:SBP10.5935/1676-2444.20140018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsperança,Anna Beatriz TellesCamacho,Aline Helen da SilvaMonteiro,Juliana Bigi MayaMonteiro,Geysa Bigi MayaCaroli-Bottino,AdrianaPannain,Vera Lucia Nuneseng2014-10-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1676-24442014000300216Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jbpmlhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jbpml@sbpc.org.br1678-47741676-2444opendoar:2014-10-02T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mucins and NCAM (CD56) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinogenesis
title Mucins and NCAM (CD56) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinogenesis
spellingShingle Mucins and NCAM (CD56) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinogenesis
Esperança,Anna Beatriz Telles
cholangiocarcinoma
dysplasia
intrahepatic bile ducts
mucins
CD56
title_short Mucins and NCAM (CD56) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinogenesis
title_full Mucins and NCAM (CD56) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinogenesis
title_fullStr Mucins and NCAM (CD56) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinogenesis
title_full_unstemmed Mucins and NCAM (CD56) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinogenesis
title_sort Mucins and NCAM (CD56) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinogenesis
author Esperança,Anna Beatriz Telles
author_facet Esperança,Anna Beatriz Telles
Camacho,Aline Helen da Silva
Monteiro,Juliana Bigi Maya
Monteiro,Geysa Bigi Maya
Caroli-Bottino,Adriana
Pannain,Vera Lucia Nunes
author_role author
author2 Camacho,Aline Helen da Silva
Monteiro,Juliana Bigi Maya
Monteiro,Geysa Bigi Maya
Caroli-Bottino,Adriana
Pannain,Vera Lucia Nunes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Esperança,Anna Beatriz Telles
Camacho,Aline Helen da Silva
Monteiro,Juliana Bigi Maya
Monteiro,Geysa Bigi Maya
Caroli-Bottino,Adriana
Pannain,Vera Lucia Nunes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv cholangiocarcinoma
dysplasia
intrahepatic bile ducts
mucins
CD56
topic cholangiocarcinoma
dysplasia
intrahepatic bile ducts
mucins
CD56
description Introduction: Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common malignant neoplasm of the hepatobiliary system. During cholangiocarcinogenesis phenotypic changes occur in the ductal epithelium, including the expression of mucins (MUC). However, the evaluating studies of the expression of mucins in the different stages of cholangiocarcinogenesis are scarce. CD56 has also contributed in differentiating benign ductal proliferation and cholangiocarcinoma; however, its expression has not been evaluated in dysplastic epithelium of the bile duct yet. Objective: To assess immunohistochemical profile of (MUC) 1, 2, 5, 6, and CD56 in cholangiocarcinoma, pre-neoplastic and reactive lesions in the epithelium of intrahepatic bile ducts. Material and methods: Immunohistochemical expression of MUC 1, 2, 5, 6, and CD56 were studied for 11 cases of cholangiocarcinoma and 83 intrahepatic bile ducts (67 reactive and 16 dysplastic). Variables were considered significant when p < 0.05. Results: The expression of MUC1 occurred in about 90% of the cholangiocarcinomas, contrasting with the low frequency of positive cases in reactive and dysplastic bile ducts (p < 0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the expression of MUC5, MUC6 and CD56 between the reactive or dysplastic lesions and cholangiocarcinoma. The anti-MUC2 antibody was negative in all cases. Conclusions: MUC1 contributed for the differential diagnosis between cholangiocarcinoma and pre-neoplastic and reactive/regenerative lesions of intrahepatic bile ducts, and it should compose the antibodies panel aiming at improvement of these differential diagnoses. In contrast, MUC2, MUC5, MUC6 and CD56 were not promising in differentiating all the phases of cholangiocarcinogenesis.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442014000300216
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442014000300216
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/1676-2444.20140018
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv
Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv
Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial v.50 n.3 2014
reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)
instacron:SBP
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)
instacron_str SBP
institution SBP
reponame_str Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
collection Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jbpml@sbpc.org.br
_version_ 1752122295935041536