Do standardization and quantification of histopathological criteria improve the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease?

• Autor(a) principal: Baldin,Rosimeri Kuhl Svoboda
• Data de Publicação: 2014
• Outros Autores: Telles,José Ederaldo Queiroz, Bonardi,Renato Araújo, Amarante,Heda Maria Barska dos Santos, Baldin Júnior,Antônio
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
• Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442014000300221
• topic: ulcerative rectocolitis; Crohn's disease; biopsy; pathology

Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease comprises two major categories: Crohn's disease and ulcerative rectocolitis, both with different clinical and histological aspects, causing sometimes significant morbidity. Objectives: Choose and apply standardized and quantified histopathological diagnosis method, and compare the results and quality index with the original diagnosis. Materials and methods: 43 histological colonoscopic biopsies of 37 patients were re-evaluated by standardized system. Results and discussion: The original diagnoses were more inconclusive (23.3%) than those standardized (2.3%). The agreement with gold standard (clinical, colonoscopical, and radiological diagnosis) was higher on standardized diagnoses (95.3%) than in original (74.4%), especially in relation to Crohn's disease, which percentages were 92.3% and 46.1%, respectively. The quality index was calculated in conclusive diagnosis of each method. For ulcerative rectocolitis, both methods showed sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%; otherwise the original diagnosis demonstrated specificity of 85.7%, positive predictive value of 96.3% and accuracy of 97.0%, and the standardized diagnosis 92.3%, 96.7% and 97.6%, respectively. For Crohn's disease, there is specificity and positive predictive value of 100% in both methods; the original diagnosis showed sensitivity of 85.7%, negative predictive value of 96.3% and accuracy of 97%, while for the standardized diagnoses 92.3%, 96.7%, and 97.6%, respectively. Conclusion: The standardized diagnosis presented a higher percentage of correct and conclusive diagnoses than those presented in the original diagnosis, especially for Crohn's disease, as well as equal or slightly higher values in some quality index.