Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa,Ariela Raissa Lima
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Hauck Filho,Nelson
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Trends in Psychology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-18832019000200309
Resumo: Abstract Response styles are systematic ways of responding to self-report items that may impact the validity and the precision of scores from instruments. One of these biases is extreme responding (ER), which occurs when a person tends to use only extreme rating categories from a response scale (e.g., totally disagree or totally agree), irrespective of item content. Many different methods were developed that aim to identify and control extreme responses to provide a more accurate assessment of an individual's trait. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of these main techniques for statistical control of extreme responses in psychometric instruments of self-report. We identified several analytical approaches, which we organized into seven clusters, from simple count of the numbers of extreme response to the use of modern statistics methods, as Item Response Theory uni and multidimensional. Advantages and limitations of each method are discussed. We also present a general diagram that summarizes the distinct available methods we found.
id SBP-2_1f68fad8ab3bb3439b2613f09487db21
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2358-18832019000200309
network_acronym_str SBP-2
network_name_str Trends in Psychology
repository_id_str
spelling Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A ReviewResponse styleLikertresponse biasmeasurementAbstract Response styles are systematic ways of responding to self-report items that may impact the validity and the precision of scores from instruments. One of these biases is extreme responding (ER), which occurs when a person tends to use only extreme rating categories from a response scale (e.g., totally disagree or totally agree), irrespective of item content. Many different methods were developed that aim to identify and control extreme responses to provide a more accurate assessment of an individual's trait. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of these main techniques for statistical control of extreme responses in psychometric instruments of self-report. We identified several analytical approaches, which we organized into seven clusters, from simple count of the numbers of extreme response to the use of modern statistics methods, as Item Response Theory uni and multidimensional. Advantages and limitations of each method are discussed. We also present a general diagram that summarizes the distinct available methods we found.Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia2019-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-18832019000200309Trends in Psychology v.27 n.2 2019reponame:Trends in Psychologyinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia (SBP)instacron:SBP10.9788/tp2019.2-02info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta,Ariela Raissa LimaHauck Filho,Nelsoneng2019-06-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2358-18832019000200309Revistahttp://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1413-389XONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||comissaoeditorial@sbponline.org.br2358-18832358-1883opendoar:2019-06-11T00:00Trends in Psychology - Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia (SBP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review
title Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review
spellingShingle Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review
Costa,Ariela Raissa Lima
Response style
Likert
response bias
measurement
title_short Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review
title_full Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review
title_fullStr Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review
title_sort Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review
author Costa,Ariela Raissa Lima
author_facet Costa,Ariela Raissa Lima
Hauck Filho,Nelson
author_role author
author2 Hauck Filho,Nelson
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa,Ariela Raissa Lima
Hauck Filho,Nelson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Response style
Likert
response bias
measurement
topic Response style
Likert
response bias
measurement
description Abstract Response styles are systematic ways of responding to self-report items that may impact the validity and the precision of scores from instruments. One of these biases is extreme responding (ER), which occurs when a person tends to use only extreme rating categories from a response scale (e.g., totally disagree or totally agree), irrespective of item content. Many different methods were developed that aim to identify and control extreme responses to provide a more accurate assessment of an individual's trait. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of these main techniques for statistical control of extreme responses in psychometric instruments of self-report. We identified several analytical approaches, which we organized into seven clusters, from simple count of the numbers of extreme response to the use of modern statistics methods, as Item Response Theory uni and multidimensional. Advantages and limitations of each method are discussed. We also present a general diagram that summarizes the distinct available methods we found.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-18832019000200309
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-18832019000200309
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.9788/tp2019.2-02
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Trends in Psychology v.27 n.2 2019
reponame:Trends in Psychology
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia (SBP)
instacron:SBP
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia (SBP)
instacron_str SBP
institution SBP
reponame_str Trends in Psychology
collection Trends in Psychology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Trends in Psychology - Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia (SBP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||comissaoeditorial@sbponline.org.br
_version_ 1754734764339757056