Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Trends in Psychology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-18832019000200309 |
Resumo: | Abstract Response styles are systematic ways of responding to self-report items that may impact the validity and the precision of scores from instruments. One of these biases is extreme responding (ER), which occurs when a person tends to use only extreme rating categories from a response scale (e.g., totally disagree or totally agree), irrespective of item content. Many different methods were developed that aim to identify and control extreme responses to provide a more accurate assessment of an individual's trait. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of these main techniques for statistical control of extreme responses in psychometric instruments of self-report. We identified several analytical approaches, which we organized into seven clusters, from simple count of the numbers of extreme response to the use of modern statistics methods, as Item Response Theory uni and multidimensional. Advantages and limitations of each method are discussed. We also present a general diagram that summarizes the distinct available methods we found. |
id |
SBP-2_1f68fad8ab3bb3439b2613f09487db21 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2358-18832019000200309 |
network_acronym_str |
SBP-2 |
network_name_str |
Trends in Psychology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A ReviewResponse styleLikertresponse biasmeasurementAbstract Response styles are systematic ways of responding to self-report items that may impact the validity and the precision of scores from instruments. One of these biases is extreme responding (ER), which occurs when a person tends to use only extreme rating categories from a response scale (e.g., totally disagree or totally agree), irrespective of item content. Many different methods were developed that aim to identify and control extreme responses to provide a more accurate assessment of an individual's trait. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of these main techniques for statistical control of extreme responses in psychometric instruments of self-report. We identified several analytical approaches, which we organized into seven clusters, from simple count of the numbers of extreme response to the use of modern statistics methods, as Item Response Theory uni and multidimensional. Advantages and limitations of each method are discussed. We also present a general diagram that summarizes the distinct available methods we found.Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia2019-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-18832019000200309Trends in Psychology v.27 n.2 2019reponame:Trends in Psychologyinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia (SBP)instacron:SBP10.9788/tp2019.2-02info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta,Ariela Raissa LimaHauck Filho,Nelsoneng2019-06-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2358-18832019000200309Revistahttp://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1413-389XONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||comissaoeditorial@sbponline.org.br2358-18832358-1883opendoar:2019-06-11T00:00Trends in Psychology - Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia (SBP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review |
title |
Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review |
spellingShingle |
Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review Costa,Ariela Raissa Lima Response style Likert response bias measurement |
title_short |
Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review |
title_full |
Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review |
title_fullStr |
Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review |
title_sort |
Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review |
author |
Costa,Ariela Raissa Lima |
author_facet |
Costa,Ariela Raissa Lima Hauck Filho,Nelson |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Hauck Filho,Nelson |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa,Ariela Raissa Lima Hauck Filho,Nelson |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Response style Likert response bias measurement |
topic |
Response style Likert response bias measurement |
description |
Abstract Response styles are systematic ways of responding to self-report items that may impact the validity and the precision of scores from instruments. One of these biases is extreme responding (ER), which occurs when a person tends to use only extreme rating categories from a response scale (e.g., totally disagree or totally agree), irrespective of item content. Many different methods were developed that aim to identify and control extreme responses to provide a more accurate assessment of an individual's trait. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of these main techniques for statistical control of extreme responses in psychometric instruments of self-report. We identified several analytical approaches, which we organized into seven clusters, from simple count of the numbers of extreme response to the use of modern statistics methods, as Item Response Theory uni and multidimensional. Advantages and limitations of each method are discussed. We also present a general diagram that summarizes the distinct available methods we found. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-18832019000200309 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-18832019000200309 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.9788/tp2019.2-02 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Trends in Psychology v.27 n.2 2019 reponame:Trends in Psychology instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia (SBP) instacron:SBP |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia (SBP) |
instacron_str |
SBP |
institution |
SBP |
reponame_str |
Trends in Psychology |
collection |
Trends in Psychology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Trends in Psychology - Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia (SBP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||comissaoeditorial@sbponline.org.br |
_version_ |
1754734764339757056 |