Can procalcitonin be a diagnostic marker for catheter-related blood stream infection in children?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ozsurekci,Yasemin
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Arıkan,Kamile Oktay, Bayhan,Cihangül, Karadağ-Öncel,Eda, Aycan,Ahmet Emre, Gürbüz,Venhar, Hasçelik,Gülşen, Ceyhan,Mehmet
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572016000500414
Resumo: Abstract Objective The potential role of procalcitonin (PCT) in the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSIs) is still unclear and requires further research. The diagnostic value of serum PCT for the diagnosis of CRBSI in children is evaluated here. Method This study was conducted between October 2013 and November 2014, and included patients with suspected CRBSI from 1 month to 18 years of age who were febrile, with no focus of infection, and had a central venous catheter. Levels of PCT and other serum markers were measured, and their utility as CRBSI markers was assessed. Additionally, the clinical performance of a new, automated, rapid, and quantitative assay for the detection of PCT was tested. Results Among the 49 patients, 24 were diagnosed with CRBSI. The PCT-Kryptor and PCT-RTA values were significantly higher in proven CRBSI compared to those in unproven CRBSI (p = 0.03 and p = 0.03, respectively). There were no differences in white blood cell count and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between proven CRBSI and unproven CRBSI. Among the 24 patients with CRBSI, CRP was significantly higher among those with Gram-negative bacterial infection than in those with Gram-positive bacterial infections. PCT-Kryptor was also significantly higher among patients with Gram-negative bacterial infection than in those with Gram-positive bacterial infections (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Conclusions The authors suggest that PCT could be a helpful rapid diagnostic marker in children with suspected CRBSIs.
id SBPE-1_11831a56f38364f910350ba9122ee977
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0021-75572016000500414
network_acronym_str SBPE-1
network_name_str Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Can procalcitonin be a diagnostic marker for catheter-related blood stream infection in children?BiomarkersBloodstream infectionChildrenC-reactive proteinProcalcitoninAbstract Objective The potential role of procalcitonin (PCT) in the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSIs) is still unclear and requires further research. The diagnostic value of serum PCT for the diagnosis of CRBSI in children is evaluated here. Method This study was conducted between October 2013 and November 2014, and included patients with suspected CRBSI from 1 month to 18 years of age who were febrile, with no focus of infection, and had a central venous catheter. Levels of PCT and other serum markers were measured, and their utility as CRBSI markers was assessed. Additionally, the clinical performance of a new, automated, rapid, and quantitative assay for the detection of PCT was tested. Results Among the 49 patients, 24 were diagnosed with CRBSI. The PCT-Kryptor and PCT-RTA values were significantly higher in proven CRBSI compared to those in unproven CRBSI (p = 0.03 and p = 0.03, respectively). There were no differences in white blood cell count and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between proven CRBSI and unproven CRBSI. Among the 24 patients with CRBSI, CRP was significantly higher among those with Gram-negative bacterial infection than in those with Gram-positive bacterial infections. PCT-Kryptor was also significantly higher among patients with Gram-negative bacterial infection than in those with Gram-positive bacterial infections (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Conclusions The authors suggest that PCT could be a helpful rapid diagnostic marker in children with suspected CRBSIs.Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572016000500414Jornal de Pediatria v.92 n.4 2016reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)instacron:SBPE10.1016/j.jped.2015.11.004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOzsurekci,YaseminArıkan,Kamile OktayBayhan,CihangülKaradağ-Öncel,EdaAycan,Ahmet EmreGürbüz,VenharHasçelik,GülşenCeyhan,Mehmeteng2016-08-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0021-75572016000500414Revistahttp://www.jped.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jped@jped.com.br1678-47820021-7557opendoar:2016-08-12T00:00Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can procalcitonin be a diagnostic marker for catheter-related blood stream infection in children?
title Can procalcitonin be a diagnostic marker for catheter-related blood stream infection in children?
spellingShingle Can procalcitonin be a diagnostic marker for catheter-related blood stream infection in children?
Ozsurekci,Yasemin
Biomarkers
Bloodstream infection
Children
C-reactive protein
Procalcitonin
title_short Can procalcitonin be a diagnostic marker for catheter-related blood stream infection in children?
title_full Can procalcitonin be a diagnostic marker for catheter-related blood stream infection in children?
title_fullStr Can procalcitonin be a diagnostic marker for catheter-related blood stream infection in children?
title_full_unstemmed Can procalcitonin be a diagnostic marker for catheter-related blood stream infection in children?
title_sort Can procalcitonin be a diagnostic marker for catheter-related blood stream infection in children?
author Ozsurekci,Yasemin
author_facet Ozsurekci,Yasemin
Arıkan,Kamile Oktay
Bayhan,Cihangül
Karadağ-Öncel,Eda
Aycan,Ahmet Emre
Gürbüz,Venhar
Hasçelik,Gülşen
Ceyhan,Mehmet
author_role author
author2 Arıkan,Kamile Oktay
Bayhan,Cihangül
Karadağ-Öncel,Eda
Aycan,Ahmet Emre
Gürbüz,Venhar
Hasçelik,Gülşen
Ceyhan,Mehmet
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ozsurekci,Yasemin
Arıkan,Kamile Oktay
Bayhan,Cihangül
Karadağ-Öncel,Eda
Aycan,Ahmet Emre
Gürbüz,Venhar
Hasçelik,Gülşen
Ceyhan,Mehmet
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biomarkers
Bloodstream infection
Children
C-reactive protein
Procalcitonin
topic Biomarkers
Bloodstream infection
Children
C-reactive protein
Procalcitonin
description Abstract Objective The potential role of procalcitonin (PCT) in the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSIs) is still unclear and requires further research. The diagnostic value of serum PCT for the diagnosis of CRBSI in children is evaluated here. Method This study was conducted between October 2013 and November 2014, and included patients with suspected CRBSI from 1 month to 18 years of age who were febrile, with no focus of infection, and had a central venous catheter. Levels of PCT and other serum markers were measured, and their utility as CRBSI markers was assessed. Additionally, the clinical performance of a new, automated, rapid, and quantitative assay for the detection of PCT was tested. Results Among the 49 patients, 24 were diagnosed with CRBSI. The PCT-Kryptor and PCT-RTA values were significantly higher in proven CRBSI compared to those in unproven CRBSI (p = 0.03 and p = 0.03, respectively). There were no differences in white blood cell count and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between proven CRBSI and unproven CRBSI. Among the 24 patients with CRBSI, CRP was significantly higher among those with Gram-negative bacterial infection than in those with Gram-positive bacterial infections. PCT-Kryptor was also significantly higher among patients with Gram-negative bacterial infection than in those with Gram-positive bacterial infections (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Conclusions The authors suggest that PCT could be a helpful rapid diagnostic marker in children with suspected CRBSIs.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572016000500414
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572016000500414
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.jped.2015.11.004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal de Pediatria v.92 n.4 2016
reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
instacron:SBPE
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
instacron_str SBPE
institution SBPE
reponame_str Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
collection Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jped@jped.com.br
_version_ 1752122320836624384