Neonatal screening for severe combined immunodeficiency in Brazil,

• Autor(a) principal: Kanegae,Marilia Pyles Patto
• Data de Publicação: 2016
• Outros Autores: Barreiros,Lucila Akune, Mazzucchelli,Juliana Themudo Lessa, Hadachi,Sonia Marchezi, Guilhoto,Laura Maria de Figueiredo Ferreira, Acquesta,Ana Lúcia, Genov,Isabel Rugue, Holanda,Silvia Maia, Di Gesu,Regina Sumiko Watanabe, Goulart,Ana Lucia, Santos,Amélia Miyashiro Nunes dos, Bellesi,Newton, Costa-Carvalho,Beatriz Tavares, Condino-Neto,Antonio
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
• Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572016000500374
• topic: SCID; Neonatal screening; TRECs; T lymphocytes; Combined immunodeficiency; Primary immunodeficiency

Abstract Objective To apply, in Brazil, the T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) quantification technique using real-time polymerase chain reaction in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency and assess the feasibility of implementing it on a large scale in Brazil. Methods 8715 newborn blood samples were collected on filter paper and, after DNA elution, TRECs were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction. The cutoff value to determine whether a sample was abnormal was determined by ROC curve analysis, using SSPS. Results The concentration of TRECs in 8,682 samples ranged from 2 to 2,181 TRECs/µL of blood, with mean and median of 324 and 259 TRECs/µL, respectively. Forty-nine (0.56%) samples were below the cutoff (30 TRECs/µL) and were reanalyzed. Four (0.05%) samples had abnormal results (between 16 and 29 TRECs/µL). Samples from patients previously identified as having severe combined immunodeficiency or DiGeorge syndrome were used to validate the assay and all of them showed TRECs below the cutoff. Preterm infants had lower levels of TRECs than full-term neonates. The ROC curve showed a cutoff of 26 TRECs/µL, with 100% sensitivity for detecting severe combined immunodeficiency. Using this value, retest and referral rates were 0.43% (37 samples) and 0.03% (3 samples), respectively. Conclusion The technique is reliable and can be applied on a large scale after the training of technical teams throughout Brazil.