The conception, content validation, and test-retest reliability of the Questionnaire for Screen Time of Adolescents (QueST)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Knebel,Margarethe Thaisi Garro
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Costa,Bruno Goncalves Galdino da, Santos,Priscila Cristina dos, Sousa,Ana Caroline Ferreira Campos de, Silva,Kelly Samara
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572022000200175
Resumo: Abstract Objective: To analyze the content validity and the test-retest reliability of the Questionnaire for Screen Time of Adolescents (QueST). Methods: A study was conducted with high school adolescents from Southern Brazil enrolled in public education (2019). The QueST measures screen time across five constructs: studying, working/internship-related activities, watching videos, playing games, using social media/chat applications. Content validation involved consulting with experts and adolescents to evaluate whether the five constructs were clear and representing screen time behaviors, all ratings were quantified. The experts’ evaluation provided Content Validity Indexes (CVI) for clarity and representativeness of the questionnaire. Students answered the QueST twice (1-week apart), and differences between applications were verified. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses. Results: Among the experts, the CVI indicated 94% and 98% of clarity and representativeness, respectively. All items were highly clear for at least 70% of the students. Test-retest reliability was assessed with 104 students (16.3 ± 1.02 years; 66.3% girls). The ICC ranged from 0.41 (95%CI 0.24–0.56) for videos to 0.76 (95%CI 0.66–0.83) for social media/chat applications on weekdays; and from 0.24 (95%CI 0.04–0.41) for videos to 0.67 (95%CI 0.54–0.77) for social media/chat applications on weekends. The lowest mean difference was -4.6 min for working on weekdays, while the highest was 40.6 min for videos on weekends. Conclusions: The QueST proved to be fair to excellent for measuring different screen time constructs. However, the item of videos (weekends) showed poor stability. The QueST demonstrates satisfactory content validity attested by the experts and adolescents.
id SBPE-1_816c2ec7cc51b562a4d1e4acb99e5f20
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0021-75572022000200175
network_acronym_str SBPE-1
network_name_str Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The conception, content validation, and test-retest reliability of the Questionnaire for Screen Time of Adolescents (QueST)Adolescent behaviorSelf-reportSedentary behaviorValidation studyReproducibility of resultsAbstract Objective: To analyze the content validity and the test-retest reliability of the Questionnaire for Screen Time of Adolescents (QueST). Methods: A study was conducted with high school adolescents from Southern Brazil enrolled in public education (2019). The QueST measures screen time across five constructs: studying, working/internship-related activities, watching videos, playing games, using social media/chat applications. Content validation involved consulting with experts and adolescents to evaluate whether the five constructs were clear and representing screen time behaviors, all ratings were quantified. The experts’ evaluation provided Content Validity Indexes (CVI) for clarity and representativeness of the questionnaire. Students answered the QueST twice (1-week apart), and differences between applications were verified. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses. Results: Among the experts, the CVI indicated 94% and 98% of clarity and representativeness, respectively. All items were highly clear for at least 70% of the students. Test-retest reliability was assessed with 104 students (16.3 ± 1.02 years; 66.3% girls). The ICC ranged from 0.41 (95%CI 0.24–0.56) for videos to 0.76 (95%CI 0.66–0.83) for social media/chat applications on weekdays; and from 0.24 (95%CI 0.04–0.41) for videos to 0.67 (95%CI 0.54–0.77) for social media/chat applications on weekends. The lowest mean difference was -4.6 min for working on weekdays, while the highest was 40.6 min for videos on weekends. Conclusions: The QueST proved to be fair to excellent for measuring different screen time constructs. However, the item of videos (weekends) showed poor stability. The QueST demonstrates satisfactory content validity attested by the experts and adolescents.Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria2022-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572022000200175Jornal de Pediatria v.98 n.2 2022reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)instacron:SBPE10.1016/j.jped.2021.05.004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKnebel,Margarethe Thaisi GarroCosta,Bruno Goncalves Galdino daSantos,Priscila Cristina dosSousa,Ana Caroline Ferreira Campos deSilva,Kelly Samaraeng2022-04-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0021-75572022000200175Revistahttp://www.jped.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jped@jped.com.br1678-47820021-7557opendoar:2022-04-18T00:00Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The conception, content validation, and test-retest reliability of the Questionnaire for Screen Time of Adolescents (QueST)
title The conception, content validation, and test-retest reliability of the Questionnaire for Screen Time of Adolescents (QueST)
spellingShingle The conception, content validation, and test-retest reliability of the Questionnaire for Screen Time of Adolescents (QueST)
Knebel,Margarethe Thaisi Garro
Adolescent behavior
Self-report
Sedentary behavior
Validation study
Reproducibility of results
title_short The conception, content validation, and test-retest reliability of the Questionnaire for Screen Time of Adolescents (QueST)
title_full The conception, content validation, and test-retest reliability of the Questionnaire for Screen Time of Adolescents (QueST)
title_fullStr The conception, content validation, and test-retest reliability of the Questionnaire for Screen Time of Adolescents (QueST)
title_full_unstemmed The conception, content validation, and test-retest reliability of the Questionnaire for Screen Time of Adolescents (QueST)
title_sort The conception, content validation, and test-retest reliability of the Questionnaire for Screen Time of Adolescents (QueST)
author Knebel,Margarethe Thaisi Garro
author_facet Knebel,Margarethe Thaisi Garro
Costa,Bruno Goncalves Galdino da
Santos,Priscila Cristina dos
Sousa,Ana Caroline Ferreira Campos de
Silva,Kelly Samara
author_role author
author2 Costa,Bruno Goncalves Galdino da
Santos,Priscila Cristina dos
Sousa,Ana Caroline Ferreira Campos de
Silva,Kelly Samara
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Knebel,Margarethe Thaisi Garro
Costa,Bruno Goncalves Galdino da
Santos,Priscila Cristina dos
Sousa,Ana Caroline Ferreira Campos de
Silva,Kelly Samara
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adolescent behavior
Self-report
Sedentary behavior
Validation study
Reproducibility of results
topic Adolescent behavior
Self-report
Sedentary behavior
Validation study
Reproducibility of results
description Abstract Objective: To analyze the content validity and the test-retest reliability of the Questionnaire for Screen Time of Adolescents (QueST). Methods: A study was conducted with high school adolescents from Southern Brazil enrolled in public education (2019). The QueST measures screen time across five constructs: studying, working/internship-related activities, watching videos, playing games, using social media/chat applications. Content validation involved consulting with experts and adolescents to evaluate whether the five constructs were clear and representing screen time behaviors, all ratings were quantified. The experts’ evaluation provided Content Validity Indexes (CVI) for clarity and representativeness of the questionnaire. Students answered the QueST twice (1-week apart), and differences between applications were verified. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses. Results: Among the experts, the CVI indicated 94% and 98% of clarity and representativeness, respectively. All items were highly clear for at least 70% of the students. Test-retest reliability was assessed with 104 students (16.3 ± 1.02 years; 66.3% girls). The ICC ranged from 0.41 (95%CI 0.24–0.56) for videos to 0.76 (95%CI 0.66–0.83) for social media/chat applications on weekdays; and from 0.24 (95%CI 0.04–0.41) for videos to 0.67 (95%CI 0.54–0.77) for social media/chat applications on weekends. The lowest mean difference was -4.6 min for working on weekdays, while the highest was 40.6 min for videos on weekends. Conclusions: The QueST proved to be fair to excellent for measuring different screen time constructs. However, the item of videos (weekends) showed poor stability. The QueST demonstrates satisfactory content validity attested by the experts and adolescents.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572022000200175
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572022000200175
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.jped.2021.05.004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal de Pediatria v.98 n.2 2022
reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
instacron:SBPE
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
instacron_str SBPE
institution SBPE
reponame_str Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
collection Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jped@jped.com.br
_version_ 1752122323263029248