Crosscheck as a legitimization strategy of the journalism field in reaction to fake news

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Trevisan Fossá, Maria Ivete
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Müller, Kauane Andressa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Brazilian journalism research (Online)
Texto Completo: https://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/article/view/1196
Resumo: ABSTRACTRESUMORESUMENtem que pegar no arquivo
id SBPJOR-1_37946f400737d6aa594d692bd3e91f53
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1196
network_acronym_str SBPJOR-1
network_name_str Brazilian journalism research (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Crosscheck as a legitimization strategy of the journalism field in reaction to fake newsCrosscheck as a legitimization strategy of the journalism field in reaction to fake newsJournalistic fieldLegitimation strategiesCheckingCrosscheckABSTRACTRESUMORESUMENtem que pegar no arquivoThis work aims to understand Projeto Comprova as a legitimation strategy of the journalistic field. We also propose an initial approach with the crosscheck experience, during the debate about fake news. The principal strategy used in this case is credibility, which is obtained in a deal between journalism and society. This deal allows a trust relationship. At Projeto Comprova, there is a concern in detail the verification process, which causes a modification in the narrative order. Besides, in the fake news context, the idea of news itself changed in checking business. In the digital ambience, there is a modification in the narrative built with emphasis in the verification of facts or data: if the journalistic companies classify some information as false, it becomes news.Este estudo tem por objetivo compreender o Projeto Comprova como estratégia de legitimação do campo jornalístico e propor uma primeira aproximação com a experiência de checagem cruzada, em meio ao debate sobre notícias falsas. A principal estratégia acionada nesse caso é a de credibilidade, obtida num acordo entre jornalismo e sociedade, que permite que seja estabelecida uma relação de confiança. No Projeto Comprova, há uma preocupação por detalhar o processo de apuração, causando uma modificação de ordem narrativa. Além disso, a partir da noção de fake news, modifica-se a própria ideia do que é notícia em iniciativas de checagem, de modo que a narrativa construída com ênfase no processo de apuração de fatos ou de dados na ambiência digital transforma a classificação de uma informação como falsa pelas organizações jornalísticas na própria notícia.Este trabajo tiene como objetivo comprender el Projeto Comprova como estrategia de legitimación del entorno periodístico y proponer una primera aproximación con la experiencia de chequeo cruzado, en medio a discusiones sobre noticias falsas. La principal estrategia accionada es la de credibilidad, obtenida en un acuerdo entre periodismo y sociedad, que permite establecer una relación de confianza. En Projeto Comprova, hay la preocupación en detallar el proceso de apuración, lo que causa una modificación de orden narrativo. Además, a partir de la noción de fake news, se cambia la propia idea de lo que es noticia en espacios de chequeo, de modo que la narración construida con énfasis en el proceso de apuración de hechos o de datos en el ambiente digital transforma la clasificación de una información por las empresas periodísticas como falsa en la propia noticia.Brazilian Association of Journalism Researchers (SBPJor)2019-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/article/view/119610.25200/BJR.v15n3.2019.1196Brazilian journalism research; Vol. 15 No. 3: (December 2019): Fake news: challenges and risks for contemporary journalism; 430-451Brazilian journalism research; v. 15 n. 3: (December 2019): Fake news: challenges and risks for contemporary journalism; 430-4511981-98541808-4079reponame:Brazilian journalism research (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Jornalismo (SBPJor)instacron:SBPJORengporhttps://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/article/view/1196/pdfhttps://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/article/view/1196/pdf_1Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Journalism Reasearchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTrevisan Fossá, Maria IveteMüller, Kauane Andressa2020-01-14T21:39:49Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1196Revistahttps://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjrONGhttps://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/oaibjreditor@gmail.com||bjreditor@gmail.com1981-98541808-4079opendoar:2020-01-14T21:39:49Brazilian journalism research (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Jornalismo (SBPJor)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Crosscheck as a legitimization strategy of the journalism field in reaction to fake news
Crosscheck as a legitimization strategy of the journalism field in reaction to fake news
title Crosscheck as a legitimization strategy of the journalism field in reaction to fake news
spellingShingle Crosscheck as a legitimization strategy of the journalism field in reaction to fake news
Trevisan Fossá, Maria Ivete
Journalistic field
Legitimation strategies
Checking
Crosscheck
title_short Crosscheck as a legitimization strategy of the journalism field in reaction to fake news
title_full Crosscheck as a legitimization strategy of the journalism field in reaction to fake news
title_fullStr Crosscheck as a legitimization strategy of the journalism field in reaction to fake news
title_full_unstemmed Crosscheck as a legitimization strategy of the journalism field in reaction to fake news
title_sort Crosscheck as a legitimization strategy of the journalism field in reaction to fake news
author Trevisan Fossá, Maria Ivete
author_facet Trevisan Fossá, Maria Ivete
Müller, Kauane Andressa
author_role author
author2 Müller, Kauane Andressa
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Trevisan Fossá, Maria Ivete
Müller, Kauane Andressa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Journalistic field
Legitimation strategies
Checking
Crosscheck
topic Journalistic field
Legitimation strategies
Checking
Crosscheck
description ABSTRACTRESUMORESUMENtem que pegar no arquivo
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/article/view/1196
10.25200/BJR.v15n3.2019.1196
url https://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/article/view/1196
identifier_str_mv 10.25200/BJR.v15n3.2019.1196
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/article/view/1196/pdf
https://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/article/view/1196/pdf_1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Journalism Reasearch
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Journalism Reasearch
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Association of Journalism Researchers (SBPJor)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Association of Journalism Researchers (SBPJor)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian journalism research; Vol. 15 No. 3: (December 2019): Fake news: challenges and risks for contemporary journalism; 430-451
Brazilian journalism research; v. 15 n. 3: (December 2019): Fake news: challenges and risks for contemporary journalism; 430-451
1981-9854
1808-4079
reponame:Brazilian journalism research (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Jornalismo (SBPJor)
instacron:SBPJOR
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Jornalismo (SBPJor)
instacron_str SBPJOR
institution SBPJOR
reponame_str Brazilian journalism research (Online)
collection Brazilian journalism research (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journalism research (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Jornalismo (SBPJor)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjreditor@gmail.com||bjreditor@gmail.com
_version_ 1799304160361840640

Registros relacionados