Manipulation, professional practices and deontology in informational photography: identifying new parameters
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journalism research (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/article/view/632 |
Resumo: | This paper investigates impacts of digital technologies on photographic post-production and image manipulation in information photography. An attempt is made to assess the extent to which ethical codes and conventions are being modified concerning the digital treatment of photographic images. We sought to assess whether one can identify, in the rules of photographic competitions, an embryonic process of establishment of new boundaries as to what constitutes content manipulation and what is acceptable as technical adjustments. We observed that, in a large proportion of cases, competition rules consist of very generic guidelines regarding the acceptable procedures for photo editing, without clear distinctions between technical adjustment and manipulation. Despite such limitations, we conclude that the analysis of photographic competitions can lead to identification of observable regularities that may act as ethical standards in relation to post-production images. |
id |
SBPJOR-1_564bd5703526163b3f5d597a67c4b78b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/632 |
network_acronym_str |
SBPJOR-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journalism research (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Manipulation, professional practices and deontology in informational photography: identifying new parametersContests photographyImage manipulationPhotography informationDeontology and ethicsPhotojournalismThis paper investigates impacts of digital technologies on photographic post-production and image manipulation in information photography. An attempt is made to assess the extent to which ethical codes and conventions are being modified concerning the digital treatment of photographic images. We sought to assess whether one can identify, in the rules of photographic competitions, an embryonic process of establishment of new boundaries as to what constitutes content manipulation and what is acceptable as technical adjustments. We observed that, in a large proportion of cases, competition rules consist of very generic guidelines regarding the acceptable procedures for photo editing, without clear distinctions between technical adjustment and manipulation. Despite such limitations, we conclude that the analysis of photographic competitions can lead to identification of observable regularities that may act as ethical standards in relation to post-production images.Brazilian Association of Journalism Researchers (SBPJor)2014-06-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/article/view/63210.25200/BJR.v10n1.2014.632Brazilian journalism research; Vol. 10 No. 1: (June 2014): English version; 210-237Brazilian journalism research; v. 10 n. 1: (June 2014): English version; 210-2371981-98541808-4079reponame:Brazilian journalism research (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Jornalismo (SBPJor)instacron:SBPJORenghttps://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/article/view/632/555Copyright (c) 2017 Brazilian Journalism Reasearchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMunhoz, Paulo2017-08-14T15:47:04Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/632Revistahttps://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjrONGhttps://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/oaibjreditor@gmail.com||bjreditor@gmail.com1981-98541808-4079opendoar:2017-08-14T15:47:04Brazilian journalism research (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Jornalismo (SBPJor)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Manipulation, professional practices and deontology in informational photography: identifying new parameters |
title |
Manipulation, professional practices and deontology in informational photography: identifying new parameters |
spellingShingle |
Manipulation, professional practices and deontology in informational photography: identifying new parameters Munhoz, Paulo Contests photography Image manipulation Photography information Deontology and ethics Photojournalism |
title_short |
Manipulation, professional practices and deontology in informational photography: identifying new parameters |
title_full |
Manipulation, professional practices and deontology in informational photography: identifying new parameters |
title_fullStr |
Manipulation, professional practices and deontology in informational photography: identifying new parameters |
title_full_unstemmed |
Manipulation, professional practices and deontology in informational photography: identifying new parameters |
title_sort |
Manipulation, professional practices and deontology in informational photography: identifying new parameters |
author |
Munhoz, Paulo |
author_facet |
Munhoz, Paulo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Munhoz, Paulo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Contests photography Image manipulation Photography information Deontology and ethics Photojournalism |
topic |
Contests photography Image manipulation Photography information Deontology and ethics Photojournalism |
description |
This paper investigates impacts of digital technologies on photographic post-production and image manipulation in information photography. An attempt is made to assess the extent to which ethical codes and conventions are being modified concerning the digital treatment of photographic images. We sought to assess whether one can identify, in the rules of photographic competitions, an embryonic process of establishment of new boundaries as to what constitutes content manipulation and what is acceptable as technical adjustments. We observed that, in a large proportion of cases, competition rules consist of very generic guidelines regarding the acceptable procedures for photo editing, without clear distinctions between technical adjustment and manipulation. Despite such limitations, we conclude that the analysis of photographic competitions can lead to identification of observable regularities that may act as ethical standards in relation to post-production images. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-06-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/article/view/632 10.25200/BJR.v10n1.2014.632 |
url |
https://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/article/view/632 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.25200/BJR.v10n1.2014.632 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/article/view/632/555 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Brazilian Journalism Reasearch info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Brazilian Journalism Reasearch |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Association of Journalism Researchers (SBPJor) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Association of Journalism Researchers (SBPJor) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journalism research; Vol. 10 No. 1: (June 2014): English version; 210-237 Brazilian journalism research; v. 10 n. 1: (June 2014): English version; 210-237 1981-9854 1808-4079 reponame:Brazilian journalism research (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Jornalismo (SBPJor) instacron:SBPJOR |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Jornalismo (SBPJor) |
instacron_str |
SBPJOR |
institution |
SBPJOR |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journalism research (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journalism research (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journalism research (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Jornalismo (SBPJor) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjreditor@gmail.com||bjreditor@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799304159252447232 |