Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Giacomelli,Bruno Rodrigues, Dotto,Patricia Pasquali, Fontanella,Vânia Regina Camargo, Rosing,Cassiano Kuchenbecker
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242010000400012
Resumo: There is little material in the literature that compares biological width measurements in periapical and bite-wings radiographs with clinical measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of biological width taken by three different methods which are frequently used for planning periodontal surgery - periapical radiograph, bite-wing radiograph and transperiodontal probing - with the trans-surgical measurements. Thirty-four sites from twenty-one subjects were analyzed. The intra-class correlation coefficients between measurements obtained trans-surgically (gold standard) and those obtained by transperiodontal probing, periapical radiography and bite-wing radiography were determined. Average measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon test at a significance level of 0.05. Also, the frequency distribution of differences between test measurements and the gold standard was calculated. The results showed that transperiodontal probing (mean 2.05 mm) was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard (mean 1.97 mm), with no statistically significant difference observed. On the other hand, periapical and bite-wing radiographic mean values (1.56 mm and 1.72 mm, respectively) were smaller than the gold standard, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). It was concluded that transperiodontal probing was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard, followed by that obtained with the bite-wing radiograph. The clinical relevance of these results could be that planning for crown lengthening surgery should, preferably, include transperiodontal probing.
id SBPQO-1_1ab1ec6b0c16c68ad7983e220e5fcd3c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242010000400012
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgeryPeriodonticsPlanning TechniquesCrown LengtheningSurgery/OralRadiologyThere is little material in the literature that compares biological width measurements in periapical and bite-wings radiographs with clinical measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of biological width taken by three different methods which are frequently used for planning periodontal surgery - periapical radiograph, bite-wing radiograph and transperiodontal probing - with the trans-surgical measurements. Thirty-four sites from twenty-one subjects were analyzed. The intra-class correlation coefficients between measurements obtained trans-surgically (gold standard) and those obtained by transperiodontal probing, periapical radiography and bite-wing radiography were determined. Average measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon test at a significance level of 0.05. Also, the frequency distribution of differences between test measurements and the gold standard was calculated. The results showed that transperiodontal probing (mean 2.05 mm) was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard (mean 1.97 mm), with no statistically significant difference observed. On the other hand, periapical and bite-wing radiographic mean values (1.56 mm and 1.72 mm, respectively) were smaller than the gold standard, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). It was concluded that transperiodontal probing was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard, followed by that obtained with the bite-wing radiograph. The clinical relevance of these results could be that planning for crown lengthening surgery should, preferably, include transperiodontal probing.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2010-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242010000400012Brazilian Oral Research v.24 n.4 2010reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/S1806-83242010000400012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZanatta,Fabricio BatistinGiacomelli,Bruno RodriguesDotto,Patricia PasqualiFontanella,Vânia Regina CamargoRosing,Cassiano Kuchenbeckereng2010-12-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242010000400012Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2010-12-16T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
title Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
spellingShingle Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin
Periodontics
Planning Techniques
Crown Lengthening
Surgery/Oral
Radiology
title_short Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
title_full Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
title_sort Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
author Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin
author_facet Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin
Giacomelli,Bruno Rodrigues
Dotto,Patricia Pasquali
Fontanella,Vânia Regina Camargo
Rosing,Cassiano Kuchenbecker
author_role author
author2 Giacomelli,Bruno Rodrigues
Dotto,Patricia Pasquali
Fontanella,Vânia Regina Camargo
Rosing,Cassiano Kuchenbecker
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin
Giacomelli,Bruno Rodrigues
Dotto,Patricia Pasquali
Fontanella,Vânia Regina Camargo
Rosing,Cassiano Kuchenbecker
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Periodontics
Planning Techniques
Crown Lengthening
Surgery/Oral
Radiology
topic Periodontics
Planning Techniques
Crown Lengthening
Surgery/Oral
Radiology
description There is little material in the literature that compares biological width measurements in periapical and bite-wings radiographs with clinical measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of biological width taken by three different methods which are frequently used for planning periodontal surgery - periapical radiograph, bite-wing radiograph and transperiodontal probing - with the trans-surgical measurements. Thirty-four sites from twenty-one subjects were analyzed. The intra-class correlation coefficients between measurements obtained trans-surgically (gold standard) and those obtained by transperiodontal probing, periapical radiography and bite-wing radiography were determined. Average measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon test at a significance level of 0.05. Also, the frequency distribution of differences between test measurements and the gold standard was calculated. The results showed that transperiodontal probing (mean 2.05 mm) was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard (mean 1.97 mm), with no statistically significant difference observed. On the other hand, periapical and bite-wing radiographic mean values (1.56 mm and 1.72 mm, respectively) were smaller than the gold standard, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). It was concluded that transperiodontal probing was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard, followed by that obtained with the bite-wing radiograph. The clinical relevance of these results could be that planning for crown lengthening surgery should, preferably, include transperiodontal probing.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242010000400012
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242010000400012
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1806-83242010000400012
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.24 n.4 2010
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318322098896896