Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Oral Research |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242010000400012 |
Resumo: | There is little material in the literature that compares biological width measurements in periapical and bite-wings radiographs with clinical measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of biological width taken by three different methods which are frequently used for planning periodontal surgery - periapical radiograph, bite-wing radiograph and transperiodontal probing - with the trans-surgical measurements. Thirty-four sites from twenty-one subjects were analyzed. The intra-class correlation coefficients between measurements obtained trans-surgically (gold standard) and those obtained by transperiodontal probing, periapical radiography and bite-wing radiography were determined. Average measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon test at a significance level of 0.05. Also, the frequency distribution of differences between test measurements and the gold standard was calculated. The results showed that transperiodontal probing (mean 2.05 mm) was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard (mean 1.97 mm), with no statistically significant difference observed. On the other hand, periapical and bite-wing radiographic mean values (1.56 mm and 1.72 mm, respectively) were smaller than the gold standard, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). It was concluded that transperiodontal probing was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard, followed by that obtained with the bite-wing radiograph. The clinical relevance of these results could be that planning for crown lengthening surgery should, preferably, include transperiodontal probing. |
id |
SBPQO-1_1ab1ec6b0c16c68ad7983e220e5fcd3c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1806-83242010000400012 |
network_acronym_str |
SBPQO-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgeryPeriodonticsPlanning TechniquesCrown LengtheningSurgery/OralRadiologyThere is little material in the literature that compares biological width measurements in periapical and bite-wings radiographs with clinical measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of biological width taken by three different methods which are frequently used for planning periodontal surgery - periapical radiograph, bite-wing radiograph and transperiodontal probing - with the trans-surgical measurements. Thirty-four sites from twenty-one subjects were analyzed. The intra-class correlation coefficients between measurements obtained trans-surgically (gold standard) and those obtained by transperiodontal probing, periapical radiography and bite-wing radiography were determined. Average measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon test at a significance level of 0.05. Also, the frequency distribution of differences between test measurements and the gold standard was calculated. The results showed that transperiodontal probing (mean 2.05 mm) was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard (mean 1.97 mm), with no statistically significant difference observed. On the other hand, periapical and bite-wing radiographic mean values (1.56 mm and 1.72 mm, respectively) were smaller than the gold standard, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). It was concluded that transperiodontal probing was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard, followed by that obtained with the bite-wing radiograph. The clinical relevance of these results could be that planning for crown lengthening surgery should, preferably, include transperiodontal probing.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2010-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242010000400012Brazilian Oral Research v.24 n.4 2010reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/S1806-83242010000400012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZanatta,Fabricio BatistinGiacomelli,Bruno RodriguesDotto,Patricia PasqualiFontanella,Vânia Regina CamargoRosing,Cassiano Kuchenbeckereng2010-12-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242010000400012Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2010-12-16T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery |
title |
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin Periodontics Planning Techniques Crown Lengthening Surgery/Oral Radiology |
title_short |
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery |
title_full |
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery |
title_sort |
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery |
author |
Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin |
author_facet |
Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin Giacomelli,Bruno Rodrigues Dotto,Patricia Pasquali Fontanella,Vânia Regina Camargo Rosing,Cassiano Kuchenbecker |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Giacomelli,Bruno Rodrigues Dotto,Patricia Pasquali Fontanella,Vânia Regina Camargo Rosing,Cassiano Kuchenbecker |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin Giacomelli,Bruno Rodrigues Dotto,Patricia Pasquali Fontanella,Vânia Regina Camargo Rosing,Cassiano Kuchenbecker |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Periodontics Planning Techniques Crown Lengthening Surgery/Oral Radiology |
topic |
Periodontics Planning Techniques Crown Lengthening Surgery/Oral Radiology |
description |
There is little material in the literature that compares biological width measurements in periapical and bite-wings radiographs with clinical measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of biological width taken by three different methods which are frequently used for planning periodontal surgery - periapical radiograph, bite-wing radiograph and transperiodontal probing - with the trans-surgical measurements. Thirty-four sites from twenty-one subjects were analyzed. The intra-class correlation coefficients between measurements obtained trans-surgically (gold standard) and those obtained by transperiodontal probing, periapical radiography and bite-wing radiography were determined. Average measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon test at a significance level of 0.05. Also, the frequency distribution of differences between test measurements and the gold standard was calculated. The results showed that transperiodontal probing (mean 2.05 mm) was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard (mean 1.97 mm), with no statistically significant difference observed. On the other hand, periapical and bite-wing radiographic mean values (1.56 mm and 1.72 mm, respectively) were smaller than the gold standard, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). It was concluded that transperiodontal probing was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard, followed by that obtained with the bite-wing radiograph. The clinical relevance of these results could be that planning for crown lengthening surgery should, preferably, include transperiodontal probing. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242010000400012 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242010000400012 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1806-83242010000400012 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research v.24 n.4 2010 reponame:Brazilian Oral Research instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) instacron:SBPQO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
instacron_str |
SBPQO |
institution |
SBPQO |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
collection |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318322098896896 |