Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: CIDADE,Castelo Pedro Vemba
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: PIMENTEL,Marcele Jardim, AMARAL,Regiane Cristina do, NÓBILO,Mauro Antonio de Arruda, BARBOSA,José Ricardo de Albergaria
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242014000100259
Resumo: Conventional tilted implants are used in oral rehabilitation for heavily absorbed maxilla to avoid bone grafts; however, few research studies evaluate the biomechanical behavior when different angulations of the implants are used. The aim of this study was evaluate, trough photoelastic method, two different angulations and length of the cantilever in fixed implant-supported maxillary complete dentures. Two groups were evaluated: G15 (distal tilted implants 15°) and G35 (distal tilted implants 35°) n = 6. For each model, 2 distal tilted implants (3.5 x 15 mm long cylindrical cone) and 2 parallel tilted implants in the anterior region (3.5 x 10 mm) were installed. Photoelastic models were submitted to three vertical load tests: in the end of cantilever, in the last pillar and in the all pillars at the same time. We obtained the shear stress by Fringes software and found values for total, cervical and apical stress. The quantitative analysis was performed using the Student tests and Mann-Whitney test; p ≥ 0.05. There is no difference between G15 and G35 for total stress regardless of load type. Analyzing the apical region, G35 reduced strain values considering the distal loads (in the cantilever p = 0.03 and in the last pillar p = 0.02), without increasing the stress level in the cervical region. Considering the load in all pillars, G35 showed higher stress concentration in the cervical region (p = 0.04). For distal loads, G15 showed increase of tension in the apical region, while for load in all pillars, G35 inclination increases stress values in the cervical region.
id SBPQO-1_4935a5eb364dc5fa71d9152011b81b62
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242014000100259
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxillaDental ImplantsMaxillaBone ResorptionConventional tilted implants are used in oral rehabilitation for heavily absorbed maxilla to avoid bone grafts; however, few research studies evaluate the biomechanical behavior when different angulations of the implants are used. The aim of this study was evaluate, trough photoelastic method, two different angulations and length of the cantilever in fixed implant-supported maxillary complete dentures. Two groups were evaluated: G15 (distal tilted implants 15°) and G35 (distal tilted implants 35°) n = 6. For each model, 2 distal tilted implants (3.5 x 15 mm long cylindrical cone) and 2 parallel tilted implants in the anterior region (3.5 x 10 mm) were installed. Photoelastic models were submitted to three vertical load tests: in the end of cantilever, in the last pillar and in the all pillars at the same time. We obtained the shear stress by Fringes software and found values for total, cervical and apical stress. The quantitative analysis was performed using the Student tests and Mann-Whitney test; p ≥ 0.05. There is no difference between G15 and G35 for total stress regardless of load type. Analyzing the apical region, G35 reduced strain values considering the distal loads (in the cantilever p = 0.03 and in the last pillar p = 0.02), without increasing the stress level in the cervical region. Considering the load in all pillars, G35 showed higher stress concentration in the cervical region (p = 0.04). For distal loads, G15 showed increase of tension in the apical region, while for load in all pillars, G35 inclination increases stress values in the cervical region.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242014000100259Brazilian Oral Research v.28 n.1 2014reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vol28.0051info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCIDADE,Castelo Pedro VembaPIMENTEL,Marcele JardimAMARAL,Regiane Cristina doNÓBILO,Mauro Antonio de ArrudaBARBOSA,José Ricardo de Albergariaeng2018-09-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242014000100259Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2018-09-17T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla
title Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla
spellingShingle Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla
CIDADE,Castelo Pedro Vemba
Dental Implants
Maxilla
Bone Resorption
title_short Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla
title_full Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla
title_fullStr Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla
title_full_unstemmed Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla
title_sort Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla
author CIDADE,Castelo Pedro Vemba
author_facet CIDADE,Castelo Pedro Vemba
PIMENTEL,Marcele Jardim
AMARAL,Regiane Cristina do
NÓBILO,Mauro Antonio de Arruda
BARBOSA,José Ricardo de Albergaria
author_role author
author2 PIMENTEL,Marcele Jardim
AMARAL,Regiane Cristina do
NÓBILO,Mauro Antonio de Arruda
BARBOSA,José Ricardo de Albergaria
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv CIDADE,Castelo Pedro Vemba
PIMENTEL,Marcele Jardim
AMARAL,Regiane Cristina do
NÓBILO,Mauro Antonio de Arruda
BARBOSA,José Ricardo de Albergaria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental Implants
Maxilla
Bone Resorption
topic Dental Implants
Maxilla
Bone Resorption
description Conventional tilted implants are used in oral rehabilitation for heavily absorbed maxilla to avoid bone grafts; however, few research studies evaluate the biomechanical behavior when different angulations of the implants are used. The aim of this study was evaluate, trough photoelastic method, two different angulations and length of the cantilever in fixed implant-supported maxillary complete dentures. Two groups were evaluated: G15 (distal tilted implants 15°) and G35 (distal tilted implants 35°) n = 6. For each model, 2 distal tilted implants (3.5 x 15 mm long cylindrical cone) and 2 parallel tilted implants in the anterior region (3.5 x 10 mm) were installed. Photoelastic models were submitted to three vertical load tests: in the end of cantilever, in the last pillar and in the all pillars at the same time. We obtained the shear stress by Fringes software and found values for total, cervical and apical stress. The quantitative analysis was performed using the Student tests and Mann-Whitney test; p ≥ 0.05. There is no difference between G15 and G35 for total stress regardless of load type. Analyzing the apical region, G35 reduced strain values considering the distal loads (in the cantilever p = 0.03 and in the last pillar p = 0.02), without increasing the stress level in the cervical region. Considering the load in all pillars, G35 showed higher stress concentration in the cervical region (p = 0.04). For distal loads, G15 showed increase of tension in the apical region, while for load in all pillars, G35 inclination increases stress values in the cervical region.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242014000100259
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242014000100259
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vol28.0051
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.28 n.1 2014
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318323847921664