Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Oral Research |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242014000100259 |
Resumo: | Conventional tilted implants are used in oral rehabilitation for heavily absorbed maxilla to avoid bone grafts; however, few research studies evaluate the biomechanical behavior when different angulations of the implants are used. The aim of this study was evaluate, trough photoelastic method, two different angulations and length of the cantilever in fixed implant-supported maxillary complete dentures. Two groups were evaluated: G15 (distal tilted implants 15°) and G35 (distal tilted implants 35°) n = 6. For each model, 2 distal tilted implants (3.5 x 15 mm long cylindrical cone) and 2 parallel tilted implants in the anterior region (3.5 x 10 mm) were installed. Photoelastic models were submitted to three vertical load tests: in the end of cantilever, in the last pillar and in the all pillars at the same time. We obtained the shear stress by Fringes software and found values for total, cervical and apical stress. The quantitative analysis was performed using the Student tests and Mann-Whitney test; p ≥ 0.05. There is no difference between G15 and G35 for total stress regardless of load type. Analyzing the apical region, G35 reduced strain values considering the distal loads (in the cantilever p = 0.03 and in the last pillar p = 0.02), without increasing the stress level in the cervical region. Considering the load in all pillars, G35 showed higher stress concentration in the cervical region (p = 0.04). For distal loads, G15 showed increase of tension in the apical region, while for load in all pillars, G35 inclination increases stress values in the cervical region. |
id |
SBPQO-1_4935a5eb364dc5fa71d9152011b81b62 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1806-83242014000100259 |
network_acronym_str |
SBPQO-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxillaDental ImplantsMaxillaBone ResorptionConventional tilted implants are used in oral rehabilitation for heavily absorbed maxilla to avoid bone grafts; however, few research studies evaluate the biomechanical behavior when different angulations of the implants are used. The aim of this study was evaluate, trough photoelastic method, two different angulations and length of the cantilever in fixed implant-supported maxillary complete dentures. Two groups were evaluated: G15 (distal tilted implants 15°) and G35 (distal tilted implants 35°) n = 6. For each model, 2 distal tilted implants (3.5 x 15 mm long cylindrical cone) and 2 parallel tilted implants in the anterior region (3.5 x 10 mm) were installed. Photoelastic models were submitted to three vertical load tests: in the end of cantilever, in the last pillar and in the all pillars at the same time. We obtained the shear stress by Fringes software and found values for total, cervical and apical stress. The quantitative analysis was performed using the Student tests and Mann-Whitney test; p ≥ 0.05. There is no difference between G15 and G35 for total stress regardless of load type. Analyzing the apical region, G35 reduced strain values considering the distal loads (in the cantilever p = 0.03 and in the last pillar p = 0.02), without increasing the stress level in the cervical region. Considering the load in all pillars, G35 showed higher stress concentration in the cervical region (p = 0.04). For distal loads, G15 showed increase of tension in the apical region, while for load in all pillars, G35 inclination increases stress values in the cervical region.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242014000100259Brazilian Oral Research v.28 n.1 2014reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vol28.0051info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCIDADE,Castelo Pedro VembaPIMENTEL,Marcele JardimAMARAL,Regiane Cristina doNÓBILO,Mauro Antonio de ArrudaBARBOSA,José Ricardo de Albergariaeng2018-09-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242014000100259Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2018-09-17T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla |
title |
Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla |
spellingShingle |
Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla CIDADE,Castelo Pedro Vemba Dental Implants Maxilla Bone Resorption |
title_short |
Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla |
title_full |
Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla |
title_fullStr |
Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla |
title_full_unstemmed |
Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla |
title_sort |
Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla |
author |
CIDADE,Castelo Pedro Vemba |
author_facet |
CIDADE,Castelo Pedro Vemba PIMENTEL,Marcele Jardim AMARAL,Regiane Cristina do NÓBILO,Mauro Antonio de Arruda BARBOSA,José Ricardo de Albergaria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
PIMENTEL,Marcele Jardim AMARAL,Regiane Cristina do NÓBILO,Mauro Antonio de Arruda BARBOSA,José Ricardo de Albergaria |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
CIDADE,Castelo Pedro Vemba PIMENTEL,Marcele Jardim AMARAL,Regiane Cristina do NÓBILO,Mauro Antonio de Arruda BARBOSA,José Ricardo de Albergaria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental Implants Maxilla Bone Resorption |
topic |
Dental Implants Maxilla Bone Resorption |
description |
Conventional tilted implants are used in oral rehabilitation for heavily absorbed maxilla to avoid bone grafts; however, few research studies evaluate the biomechanical behavior when different angulations of the implants are used. The aim of this study was evaluate, trough photoelastic method, two different angulations and length of the cantilever in fixed implant-supported maxillary complete dentures. Two groups were evaluated: G15 (distal tilted implants 15°) and G35 (distal tilted implants 35°) n = 6. For each model, 2 distal tilted implants (3.5 x 15 mm long cylindrical cone) and 2 parallel tilted implants in the anterior region (3.5 x 10 mm) were installed. Photoelastic models were submitted to three vertical load tests: in the end of cantilever, in the last pillar and in the all pillars at the same time. We obtained the shear stress by Fringes software and found values for total, cervical and apical stress. The quantitative analysis was performed using the Student tests and Mann-Whitney test; p ≥ 0.05. There is no difference between G15 and G35 for total stress regardless of load type. Analyzing the apical region, G35 reduced strain values considering the distal loads (in the cantilever p = 0.03 and in the last pillar p = 0.02), without increasing the stress level in the cervical region. Considering the load in all pillars, G35 showed higher stress concentration in the cervical region (p = 0.04). For distal loads, G15 showed increase of tension in the apical region, while for load in all pillars, G35 inclination increases stress values in the cervical region. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242014000100259 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242014000100259 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vol28.0051 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research v.28 n.1 2014 reponame:Brazilian Oral Research instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) instacron:SBPQO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
instacron_str |
SBPQO |
institution |
SBPQO |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
collection |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318323847921664 |