Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Oral Research |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100401 |
Resumo: | Abstract: This study aimed to assess the survival of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations performed using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in elderly patients. The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database. The records were searched until August 2020 in eight electronic bibliographic databases, and included randomized and non-randomized clinical trials and observational studies, with no restrictions on the language or year of publication. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted, summarized, collected for qualitative analysis, and evaluated for individual risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tool. The literature search retrieved 5,186 records; however, only seven studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included. The studies were published between 2002 and 2019. A total of 1,239 restorations were investigated at intervals of 6, 12, 24, and 60 months of follow-up. Some studies had a low risk of bias, while others had moderate and high risk of bias. In general, GIC restorations placed using ART were considered satisfactory. The 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month survival rates ranged from 81.3% to 97.2%, 72.2% to 94%, and 63% to 87%, respectively; additionally, the survival rate for the longest follow-up period (60 months) was 85%. Given the best evidence-based information regarding caries removal, we highlight the need to provide a conservative and effective technique for use in elderly patients. ART is a promising and viable alternative that guarantees the survival of restorations in elderly patients. |
id |
SBPQO-1_4c3bbd7863c51b408620ef594b520023 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1806-83242021000100401 |
network_acronym_str |
SBPQO-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic reviewDental Atraumatic Restorative TreatmentAgedGeriatric DentistryGlass Ionomer CementsRoot CariesAbstract: This study aimed to assess the survival of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations performed using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in elderly patients. The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database. The records were searched until August 2020 in eight electronic bibliographic databases, and included randomized and non-randomized clinical trials and observational studies, with no restrictions on the language or year of publication. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted, summarized, collected for qualitative analysis, and evaluated for individual risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tool. The literature search retrieved 5,186 records; however, only seven studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included. The studies were published between 2002 and 2019. A total of 1,239 restorations were investigated at intervals of 6, 12, 24, and 60 months of follow-up. Some studies had a low risk of bias, while others had moderate and high risk of bias. In general, GIC restorations placed using ART were considered satisfactory. The 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month survival rates ranged from 81.3% to 97.2%, 72.2% to 94%, and 63% to 87%, respectively; additionally, the survival rate for the longest follow-up period (60 months) was 85%. Given the best evidence-based information regarding caries removal, we highlight the need to provide a conservative and effective technique for use in elderly patients. ART is a promising and viable alternative that guarantees the survival of restorations in elderly patients.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100401Brazilian Oral Research v.35 2021reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0130info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaia,Thaís SouzaLima,Thamires DiogoVieira,Walbert de AndradeBlumenberg,CauaneAgostini,Bernardo AntonioNascimento,Gustavo GiacomelliParanhos,Luiz RenatoMenezes,Murilo de Sousaeng2021-12-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242021000100401Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2021-12-02T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review |
title |
Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review Maia,Thaís Souza Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Aged Geriatric Dentistry Glass Ionomer Cements Root Caries |
title_short |
Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review |
title_full |
Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review |
author |
Maia,Thaís Souza |
author_facet |
Maia,Thaís Souza Lima,Thamires Diogo Vieira,Walbert de Andrade Blumenberg,Cauane Agostini,Bernardo Antonio Nascimento,Gustavo Giacomelli Paranhos,Luiz Renato Menezes,Murilo de Sousa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lima,Thamires Diogo Vieira,Walbert de Andrade Blumenberg,Cauane Agostini,Bernardo Antonio Nascimento,Gustavo Giacomelli Paranhos,Luiz Renato Menezes,Murilo de Sousa |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Maia,Thaís Souza Lima,Thamires Diogo Vieira,Walbert de Andrade Blumenberg,Cauane Agostini,Bernardo Antonio Nascimento,Gustavo Giacomelli Paranhos,Luiz Renato Menezes,Murilo de Sousa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Aged Geriatric Dentistry Glass Ionomer Cements Root Caries |
topic |
Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Aged Geriatric Dentistry Glass Ionomer Cements Root Caries |
description |
Abstract: This study aimed to assess the survival of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations performed using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in elderly patients. The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database. The records were searched until August 2020 in eight electronic bibliographic databases, and included randomized and non-randomized clinical trials and observational studies, with no restrictions on the language or year of publication. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted, summarized, collected for qualitative analysis, and evaluated for individual risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tool. The literature search retrieved 5,186 records; however, only seven studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included. The studies were published between 2002 and 2019. A total of 1,239 restorations were investigated at intervals of 6, 12, 24, and 60 months of follow-up. Some studies had a low risk of bias, while others had moderate and high risk of bias. In general, GIC restorations placed using ART were considered satisfactory. The 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month survival rates ranged from 81.3% to 97.2%, 72.2% to 94%, and 63% to 87%, respectively; additionally, the survival rate for the longest follow-up period (60 months) was 85%. Given the best evidence-based information regarding caries removal, we highlight the need to provide a conservative and effective technique for use in elderly patients. ART is a promising and viable alternative that guarantees the survival of restorations in elderly patients. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100401 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100401 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0130 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research v.35 2021 reponame:Brazilian Oral Research instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) instacron:SBPQO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
instacron_str |
SBPQO |
institution |
SBPQO |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
collection |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318328020205568 |