Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maia,Thaís Souza
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Lima,Thamires Diogo, Vieira,Walbert de Andrade, Blumenberg,Cauane, Agostini,Bernardo Antonio, Nascimento,Gustavo Giacomelli, Paranhos,Luiz Renato, Menezes,Murilo de Sousa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100401
Resumo: Abstract: This study aimed to assess the survival of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations performed using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in elderly patients. The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database. The records were searched until August 2020 in eight electronic bibliographic databases, and included randomized and non-randomized clinical trials and observational studies, with no restrictions on the language or year of publication. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted, summarized, collected for qualitative analysis, and evaluated for individual risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tool. The literature search retrieved 5,186 records; however, only seven studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included. The studies were published between 2002 and 2019. A total of 1,239 restorations were investigated at intervals of 6, 12, 24, and 60 months of follow-up. Some studies had a low risk of bias, while others had moderate and high risk of bias. In general, GIC restorations placed using ART were considered satisfactory. The 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month survival rates ranged from 81.3% to 97.2%, 72.2% to 94%, and 63% to 87%, respectively; additionally, the survival rate for the longest follow-up period (60 months) was 85%. Given the best evidence-based information regarding caries removal, we highlight the need to provide a conservative and effective technique for use in elderly patients. ART is a promising and viable alternative that guarantees the survival of restorations in elderly patients.
id SBPQO-1_4c3bbd7863c51b408620ef594b520023
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242021000100401
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic reviewDental Atraumatic Restorative TreatmentAgedGeriatric DentistryGlass Ionomer CementsRoot CariesAbstract: This study aimed to assess the survival of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations performed using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in elderly patients. The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database. The records were searched until August 2020 in eight electronic bibliographic databases, and included randomized and non-randomized clinical trials and observational studies, with no restrictions on the language or year of publication. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted, summarized, collected for qualitative analysis, and evaluated for individual risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tool. The literature search retrieved 5,186 records; however, only seven studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included. The studies were published between 2002 and 2019. A total of 1,239 restorations were investigated at intervals of 6, 12, 24, and 60 months of follow-up. Some studies had a low risk of bias, while others had moderate and high risk of bias. In general, GIC restorations placed using ART were considered satisfactory. The 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month survival rates ranged from 81.3% to 97.2%, 72.2% to 94%, and 63% to 87%, respectively; additionally, the survival rate for the longest follow-up period (60 months) was 85%. Given the best evidence-based information regarding caries removal, we highlight the need to provide a conservative and effective technique for use in elderly patients. ART is a promising and viable alternative that guarantees the survival of restorations in elderly patients.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100401Brazilian Oral Research v.35 2021reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0130info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaia,Thaís SouzaLima,Thamires DiogoVieira,Walbert de AndradeBlumenberg,CauaneAgostini,Bernardo AntonioNascimento,Gustavo GiacomelliParanhos,Luiz RenatoMenezes,Murilo de Sousaeng2021-12-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242021000100401Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2021-12-02T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review
title Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review
spellingShingle Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review
Maia,Thaís Souza
Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
Aged
Geriatric Dentistry
Glass Ionomer Cements
Root Caries
title_short Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review
title_full Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review
title_fullStr Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review
title_sort Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review
author Maia,Thaís Souza
author_facet Maia,Thaís Souza
Lima,Thamires Diogo
Vieira,Walbert de Andrade
Blumenberg,Cauane
Agostini,Bernardo Antonio
Nascimento,Gustavo Giacomelli
Paranhos,Luiz Renato
Menezes,Murilo de Sousa
author_role author
author2 Lima,Thamires Diogo
Vieira,Walbert de Andrade
Blumenberg,Cauane
Agostini,Bernardo Antonio
Nascimento,Gustavo Giacomelli
Paranhos,Luiz Renato
Menezes,Murilo de Sousa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maia,Thaís Souza
Lima,Thamires Diogo
Vieira,Walbert de Andrade
Blumenberg,Cauane
Agostini,Bernardo Antonio
Nascimento,Gustavo Giacomelli
Paranhos,Luiz Renato
Menezes,Murilo de Sousa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
Aged
Geriatric Dentistry
Glass Ionomer Cements
Root Caries
topic Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
Aged
Geriatric Dentistry
Glass Ionomer Cements
Root Caries
description Abstract: This study aimed to assess the survival of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations performed using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in elderly patients. The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database. The records were searched until August 2020 in eight electronic bibliographic databases, and included randomized and non-randomized clinical trials and observational studies, with no restrictions on the language or year of publication. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted, summarized, collected for qualitative analysis, and evaluated for individual risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tool. The literature search retrieved 5,186 records; however, only seven studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included. The studies were published between 2002 and 2019. A total of 1,239 restorations were investigated at intervals of 6, 12, 24, and 60 months of follow-up. Some studies had a low risk of bias, while others had moderate and high risk of bias. In general, GIC restorations placed using ART were considered satisfactory. The 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month survival rates ranged from 81.3% to 97.2%, 72.2% to 94%, and 63% to 87%, respectively; additionally, the survival rate for the longest follow-up period (60 months) was 85%. Given the best evidence-based information regarding caries removal, we highlight the need to provide a conservative and effective technique for use in elderly patients. ART is a promising and viable alternative that guarantees the survival of restorations in elderly patients.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100401
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100401
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0130
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.35 2021
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318328020205568