A comparative study of bulk-fill composites: degree of conversion, post-gel shrinkage and cytotoxicity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gonçalves,Flávia
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Campos,Luiza Mello de Paiva, Rodrigues-Júnior,Ezequias Costa, Costa,Fabrícia Viana, Marques,Pamela Adeline, Francci,Carlos Eduardo, Braga,Roberto Ruggiero, Boaro,Letícia Cristina Cidreira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100214
Resumo: Abstract: Bulk-fill composites are claimed to be restorative materials used in deep preparations and effectively photoactivated in layers up to 4 mm. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the degree of conversion, post-gel volumetric shrinkage, and cytotoxicity of six bulk-fill and two conventional composites. Degree of conversion was determined by FTIR spectroscopy; post-gel volumetric shrinkage was determined using the strain gauge method; and cytotoxicity in human fibroblasts was evaluated indirectly by the MTT assay. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA/Tukey's test (α = 0.05). All materials, including bulk-fill and conventional composites, were classified as non-toxic, with cell viability higher than 70%. Bulk-fill composites exhibited volumetric shrinkage similar to or lower (1.4 to 0.4%) than that of conventional composites (1.7–2.1%). However, only four of the bulk-fill composites were able to sustain a homogeneous conversion at the 4-mm depth. Despite their non-toxicity and shrinkage similar to that of conventional materials, not all commercial bulk-fill materials were able to maintain a conversion as high as 80% of the superficial layer, at the 4-mm depth, indicating some failure in the bulk-fill design of some commercial brands. Therefore, the use of bulk-fill materials in dental practice is advantageous, but special attention should be given to the selection and correct use of the materials.
id SBPQO-1_74652868a3c33b6ab41d550ad8692e41
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242018000100214
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling A comparative study of bulk-fill composites: degree of conversion, post-gel shrinkage and cytotoxicityComposite ResinsMaterials TestingBiocompatible MaterialsAbstract: Bulk-fill composites are claimed to be restorative materials used in deep preparations and effectively photoactivated in layers up to 4 mm. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the degree of conversion, post-gel volumetric shrinkage, and cytotoxicity of six bulk-fill and two conventional composites. Degree of conversion was determined by FTIR spectroscopy; post-gel volumetric shrinkage was determined using the strain gauge method; and cytotoxicity in human fibroblasts was evaluated indirectly by the MTT assay. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA/Tukey's test (α = 0.05). All materials, including bulk-fill and conventional composites, were classified as non-toxic, with cell viability higher than 70%. Bulk-fill composites exhibited volumetric shrinkage similar to or lower (1.4 to 0.4%) than that of conventional composites (1.7–2.1%). However, only four of the bulk-fill composites were able to sustain a homogeneous conversion at the 4-mm depth. Despite their non-toxicity and shrinkage similar to that of conventional materials, not all commercial bulk-fill materials were able to maintain a conversion as high as 80% of the superficial layer, at the 4-mm depth, indicating some failure in the bulk-fill design of some commercial brands. Therefore, the use of bulk-fill materials in dental practice is advantageous, but special attention should be given to the selection and correct use of the materials.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100214Brazilian Oral Research v.32 2018reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonçalves,FláviaCampos,Luiza Mello de PaivaRodrigues-Júnior,Ezequias CostaCosta,Fabrícia VianaMarques,Pamela AdelineFrancci,Carlos EduardoBraga,Roberto RuggieroBoaro,Letícia Cristina Cidreiraeng2018-03-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242018000100214Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2018-03-06T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparative study of bulk-fill composites: degree of conversion, post-gel shrinkage and cytotoxicity
title A comparative study of bulk-fill composites: degree of conversion, post-gel shrinkage and cytotoxicity
spellingShingle A comparative study of bulk-fill composites: degree of conversion, post-gel shrinkage and cytotoxicity
Gonçalves,Flávia
Composite Resins
Materials Testing
Biocompatible Materials
title_short A comparative study of bulk-fill composites: degree of conversion, post-gel shrinkage and cytotoxicity
title_full A comparative study of bulk-fill composites: degree of conversion, post-gel shrinkage and cytotoxicity
title_fullStr A comparative study of bulk-fill composites: degree of conversion, post-gel shrinkage and cytotoxicity
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of bulk-fill composites: degree of conversion, post-gel shrinkage and cytotoxicity
title_sort A comparative study of bulk-fill composites: degree of conversion, post-gel shrinkage and cytotoxicity
author Gonçalves,Flávia
author_facet Gonçalves,Flávia
Campos,Luiza Mello de Paiva
Rodrigues-Júnior,Ezequias Costa
Costa,Fabrícia Viana
Marques,Pamela Adeline
Francci,Carlos Eduardo
Braga,Roberto Ruggiero
Boaro,Letícia Cristina Cidreira
author_role author
author2 Campos,Luiza Mello de Paiva
Rodrigues-Júnior,Ezequias Costa
Costa,Fabrícia Viana
Marques,Pamela Adeline
Francci,Carlos Eduardo
Braga,Roberto Ruggiero
Boaro,Letícia Cristina Cidreira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonçalves,Flávia
Campos,Luiza Mello de Paiva
Rodrigues-Júnior,Ezequias Costa
Costa,Fabrícia Viana
Marques,Pamela Adeline
Francci,Carlos Eduardo
Braga,Roberto Ruggiero
Boaro,Letícia Cristina Cidreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Composite Resins
Materials Testing
Biocompatible Materials
topic Composite Resins
Materials Testing
Biocompatible Materials
description Abstract: Bulk-fill composites are claimed to be restorative materials used in deep preparations and effectively photoactivated in layers up to 4 mm. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the degree of conversion, post-gel volumetric shrinkage, and cytotoxicity of six bulk-fill and two conventional composites. Degree of conversion was determined by FTIR spectroscopy; post-gel volumetric shrinkage was determined using the strain gauge method; and cytotoxicity in human fibroblasts was evaluated indirectly by the MTT assay. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA/Tukey's test (α = 0.05). All materials, including bulk-fill and conventional composites, were classified as non-toxic, with cell viability higher than 70%. Bulk-fill composites exhibited volumetric shrinkage similar to or lower (1.4 to 0.4%) than that of conventional composites (1.7–2.1%). However, only four of the bulk-fill composites were able to sustain a homogeneous conversion at the 4-mm depth. Despite their non-toxicity and shrinkage similar to that of conventional materials, not all commercial bulk-fill materials were able to maintain a conversion as high as 80% of the superficial layer, at the 4-mm depth, indicating some failure in the bulk-fill design of some commercial brands. Therefore, the use of bulk-fill materials in dental practice is advantageous, but special attention should be given to the selection and correct use of the materials.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100214
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100214
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0017
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.32 2018
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318325711241216