Physicomechanical characterization and biological evaluation of bulk-fill composite resin

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: NASCIMENTO,Armiliana Soares
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: LIMA,Daniel Bezerra, FOOK,Marcus Vinicius Lia, ALBUQUERQUE,Monica Soares de, LIMA,Eliane Alves de, SABINO,Marcos Antonio, BORGES,Silvia Maria Pinto, FILGUEIRA,Pedro Tardelly Diniz, SOUSA,Yasmine Carvalho de, BRAZ,Rodivan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100285
Resumo: Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effect, degree of conversion (% DC), Vickers hardness (VH), and surface morphology of composite resins. Eleven resins, nine bulk-fill resins, and two conventional resins were evaluated. Each material was sampled to evaluate DC (using FTIR), VH, cytotoxicity (using MTT and Neutral Red - NR test), surface morphology (using SEM and AFM), and organic filler (using EDS). All statistical tests were performed with SPSS and the level of significance was set at 0.05. MTT revealed that the materials presented low or no cytotoxic potential in relation to the control. Opus was the resin with the lowest cell viability at a 1:2 concentration at 72 h (32%) and at 7 days (43%), but that significantly increased when the NR test was applied at a 1:2 concentration after 7 days. Thickness and surface subjected to polymerization had no influence on DC, and differences were observed only between the materials. In the microhardness test, statistical differences were observed between the evaluated thicknesses. The bulk-fill resins analyzed in this study exhibited low and/or no cytotoxicity to L929 cells, except for Opus, which showed moderate cytotoxicity according to the MTT assay. When the NR test was used, results were not satisfactory for all composites, indicating the need for different methodologies to evaluate the properties of these materials. The assessed resins demonstrated acceptable physicomechanical properties.
id SBPQO-1_f33666206867065c035889fcdf0990b7
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242018000100285
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Physicomechanical characterization and biological evaluation of bulk-fill composite resinComposite ResinsBiocompatible MaterialsIn Vitro TechniquesAbstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effect, degree of conversion (% DC), Vickers hardness (VH), and surface morphology of composite resins. Eleven resins, nine bulk-fill resins, and two conventional resins were evaluated. Each material was sampled to evaluate DC (using FTIR), VH, cytotoxicity (using MTT and Neutral Red - NR test), surface morphology (using SEM and AFM), and organic filler (using EDS). All statistical tests were performed with SPSS and the level of significance was set at 0.05. MTT revealed that the materials presented low or no cytotoxic potential in relation to the control. Opus was the resin with the lowest cell viability at a 1:2 concentration at 72 h (32%) and at 7 days (43%), but that significantly increased when the NR test was applied at a 1:2 concentration after 7 days. Thickness and surface subjected to polymerization had no influence on DC, and differences were observed only between the materials. In the microhardness test, statistical differences were observed between the evaluated thicknesses. The bulk-fill resins analyzed in this study exhibited low and/or no cytotoxicity to L929 cells, except for Opus, which showed moderate cytotoxicity according to the MTT assay. When the NR test was used, results were not satisfactory for all composites, indicating the need for different methodologies to evaluate the properties of these materials. The assessed resins demonstrated acceptable physicomechanical properties.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100285Brazilian Oral Research v.32 2018reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0107info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNASCIMENTO,Armiliana SoaresLIMA,Daniel BezerraFOOK,Marcus Vinicius LiaALBUQUERQUE,Monica Soares deLIMA,Eliane Alves deSABINO,Marcos AntonioBORGES,Silvia Maria PintoFILGUEIRA,Pedro Tardelly DinizSOUSA,Yasmine Carvalho deBRAZ,Rodivaneng2018-10-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242018000100285Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2018-10-22T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Physicomechanical characterization and biological evaluation of bulk-fill composite resin
title Physicomechanical characterization and biological evaluation of bulk-fill composite resin
spellingShingle Physicomechanical characterization and biological evaluation of bulk-fill composite resin
NASCIMENTO,Armiliana Soares
Composite Resins
Biocompatible Materials
In Vitro Techniques
title_short Physicomechanical characterization and biological evaluation of bulk-fill composite resin
title_full Physicomechanical characterization and biological evaluation of bulk-fill composite resin
title_fullStr Physicomechanical characterization and biological evaluation of bulk-fill composite resin
title_full_unstemmed Physicomechanical characterization and biological evaluation of bulk-fill composite resin
title_sort Physicomechanical characterization and biological evaluation of bulk-fill composite resin
author NASCIMENTO,Armiliana Soares
author_facet NASCIMENTO,Armiliana Soares
LIMA,Daniel Bezerra
FOOK,Marcus Vinicius Lia
ALBUQUERQUE,Monica Soares de
LIMA,Eliane Alves de
SABINO,Marcos Antonio
BORGES,Silvia Maria Pinto
FILGUEIRA,Pedro Tardelly Diniz
SOUSA,Yasmine Carvalho de
BRAZ,Rodivan
author_role author
author2 LIMA,Daniel Bezerra
FOOK,Marcus Vinicius Lia
ALBUQUERQUE,Monica Soares de
LIMA,Eliane Alves de
SABINO,Marcos Antonio
BORGES,Silvia Maria Pinto
FILGUEIRA,Pedro Tardelly Diniz
SOUSA,Yasmine Carvalho de
BRAZ,Rodivan
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv NASCIMENTO,Armiliana Soares
LIMA,Daniel Bezerra
FOOK,Marcus Vinicius Lia
ALBUQUERQUE,Monica Soares de
LIMA,Eliane Alves de
SABINO,Marcos Antonio
BORGES,Silvia Maria Pinto
FILGUEIRA,Pedro Tardelly Diniz
SOUSA,Yasmine Carvalho de
BRAZ,Rodivan
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Composite Resins
Biocompatible Materials
In Vitro Techniques
topic Composite Resins
Biocompatible Materials
In Vitro Techniques
description Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effect, degree of conversion (% DC), Vickers hardness (VH), and surface morphology of composite resins. Eleven resins, nine bulk-fill resins, and two conventional resins were evaluated. Each material was sampled to evaluate DC (using FTIR), VH, cytotoxicity (using MTT and Neutral Red - NR test), surface morphology (using SEM and AFM), and organic filler (using EDS). All statistical tests were performed with SPSS and the level of significance was set at 0.05. MTT revealed that the materials presented low or no cytotoxic potential in relation to the control. Opus was the resin with the lowest cell viability at a 1:2 concentration at 72 h (32%) and at 7 days (43%), but that significantly increased when the NR test was applied at a 1:2 concentration after 7 days. Thickness and surface subjected to polymerization had no influence on DC, and differences were observed only between the materials. In the microhardness test, statistical differences were observed between the evaluated thicknesses. The bulk-fill resins analyzed in this study exhibited low and/or no cytotoxicity to L929 cells, except for Opus, which showed moderate cytotoxicity according to the MTT assay. When the NR test was used, results were not satisfactory for all composites, indicating the need for different methodologies to evaluate the properties of these materials. The assessed resins demonstrated acceptable physicomechanical properties.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100285
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100285
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0107
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.32 2018
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318326126477312