Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wambier,Letícia Maria
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Gonçalves,Angela da Ros, Wambier,Denise Stadler, Reis,Alessandra, Chibinski,Ana Cláudia Rodrigues
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242022000100401
Resumo: Abstract: Appropriate research reports are important to facilitate the evaluation of studies and the decision-making by dentists and policymakers. This meta-research study assessed the conformity of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations with the CONSORT recommendations and their risk of bias (RoB). Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, BBO, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from April 2019 to June 2021 for RCTs that assessed the longevity of ART restorations in children. A specific tool was used to assess adherence to the CONSORT recommendations; RoB was evaluated with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Descriptive analyses included the number of studies by journal, follow-up period, country, and quality assessments. A total of 2,181 papers were retrieved and 36 of them were analyzed qualitatively. The overall CONSORT mean score (CONms) was 22.52 ± 6.17 out of 32 points. The best described items were intervention and outcomes, whereas allocation concealment was described in only 22% of the papers. Significant differences in CONms were detected in the analysis by country and publication dates. High CONms were observed in recently published papers (26.7 ± 3.1) when compared to first ART studies (18.1 ± 4.6; p < 0.001). RoB was low in four studies, unclear in 11, and high in 21. Adherence of the papers to the CONSORT recommendations was not fully achieved and most of the papers had unclear and high RoB (PROSPERO registration #CRD42020201460).
id SBPQO-1_9a5fe56a327822a271d7a857e629e119
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242022000100401
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristicsDental Atraumatic Restorative TreatmentSystematic ReviewRandomized Controlled TrialAbstract: Appropriate research reports are important to facilitate the evaluation of studies and the decision-making by dentists and policymakers. This meta-research study assessed the conformity of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations with the CONSORT recommendations and their risk of bias (RoB). Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, BBO, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from April 2019 to June 2021 for RCTs that assessed the longevity of ART restorations in children. A specific tool was used to assess adherence to the CONSORT recommendations; RoB was evaluated with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Descriptive analyses included the number of studies by journal, follow-up period, country, and quality assessments. A total of 2,181 papers were retrieved and 36 of them were analyzed qualitatively. The overall CONSORT mean score (CONms) was 22.52 ± 6.17 out of 32 points. The best described items were intervention and outcomes, whereas allocation concealment was described in only 22% of the papers. Significant differences in CONms were detected in the analysis by country and publication dates. High CONms were observed in recently published papers (26.7 ± 3.1) when compared to first ART studies (18.1 ± 4.6; p < 0.001). RoB was low in four studies, unclear in 11, and high in 21. Adherence of the papers to the CONSORT recommendations was not fully achieved and most of the papers had unclear and high RoB (PROSPERO registration #CRD42020201460).Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242022000100401Brazilian Oral Research v.36 2022reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWambier,Letícia MariaGonçalves,Angela da RosWambier,Denise StadlerReis,AlessandraChibinski,Ana Cláudia Rodrigueseng2022-02-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242022000100401Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2022-02-07T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics
title Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics
spellingShingle Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics
Wambier,Letícia Maria
Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics
title_full Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics
title_fullStr Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics
title_full_unstemmed Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics
title_sort Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics
author Wambier,Letícia Maria
author_facet Wambier,Letícia Maria
Gonçalves,Angela da Ros
Wambier,Denise Stadler
Reis,Alessandra
Chibinski,Ana Cláudia Rodrigues
author_role author
author2 Gonçalves,Angela da Ros
Wambier,Denise Stadler
Reis,Alessandra
Chibinski,Ana Cláudia Rodrigues
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wambier,Letícia Maria
Gonçalves,Angela da Ros
Wambier,Denise Stadler
Reis,Alessandra
Chibinski,Ana Cláudia Rodrigues
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
topic Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
description Abstract: Appropriate research reports are important to facilitate the evaluation of studies and the decision-making by dentists and policymakers. This meta-research study assessed the conformity of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations with the CONSORT recommendations and their risk of bias (RoB). Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, BBO, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from April 2019 to June 2021 for RCTs that assessed the longevity of ART restorations in children. A specific tool was used to assess adherence to the CONSORT recommendations; RoB was evaluated with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Descriptive analyses included the number of studies by journal, follow-up period, country, and quality assessments. A total of 2,181 papers were retrieved and 36 of them were analyzed qualitatively. The overall CONSORT mean score (CONms) was 22.52 ± 6.17 out of 32 points. The best described items were intervention and outcomes, whereas allocation concealment was described in only 22% of the papers. Significant differences in CONms were detected in the analysis by country and publication dates. High CONms were observed in recently published papers (26.7 ± 3.1) when compared to first ART studies (18.1 ± 4.6; p < 0.001). RoB was low in four studies, unclear in 11, and high in 21. Adherence of the papers to the CONSORT recommendations was not fully achieved and most of the papers had unclear and high RoB (PROSPERO registration #CRD42020201460).
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242022000100401
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242022000100401
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0017
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.36 2022
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318328537153536