Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Oral Research |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242022000100401 |
Resumo: | Abstract: Appropriate research reports are important to facilitate the evaluation of studies and the decision-making by dentists and policymakers. This meta-research study assessed the conformity of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations with the CONSORT recommendations and their risk of bias (RoB). Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, BBO, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from April 2019 to June 2021 for RCTs that assessed the longevity of ART restorations in children. A specific tool was used to assess adherence to the CONSORT recommendations; RoB was evaluated with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Descriptive analyses included the number of studies by journal, follow-up period, country, and quality assessments. A total of 2,181 papers were retrieved and 36 of them were analyzed qualitatively. The overall CONSORT mean score (CONms) was 22.52 ± 6.17 out of 32 points. The best described items were intervention and outcomes, whereas allocation concealment was described in only 22% of the papers. Significant differences in CONms were detected in the analysis by country and publication dates. High CONms were observed in recently published papers (26.7 ± 3.1) when compared to first ART studies (18.1 ± 4.6; p < 0.001). RoB was low in four studies, unclear in 11, and high in 21. Adherence of the papers to the CONSORT recommendations was not fully achieved and most of the papers had unclear and high RoB (PROSPERO registration #CRD42020201460). |
id |
SBPQO-1_9a5fe56a327822a271d7a857e629e119 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1806-83242022000100401 |
network_acronym_str |
SBPQO-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristicsDental Atraumatic Restorative TreatmentSystematic ReviewRandomized Controlled TrialAbstract: Appropriate research reports are important to facilitate the evaluation of studies and the decision-making by dentists and policymakers. This meta-research study assessed the conformity of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations with the CONSORT recommendations and their risk of bias (RoB). Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, BBO, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from April 2019 to June 2021 for RCTs that assessed the longevity of ART restorations in children. A specific tool was used to assess adherence to the CONSORT recommendations; RoB was evaluated with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Descriptive analyses included the number of studies by journal, follow-up period, country, and quality assessments. A total of 2,181 papers were retrieved and 36 of them were analyzed qualitatively. The overall CONSORT mean score (CONms) was 22.52 ± 6.17 out of 32 points. The best described items were intervention and outcomes, whereas allocation concealment was described in only 22% of the papers. Significant differences in CONms were detected in the analysis by country and publication dates. High CONms were observed in recently published papers (26.7 ± 3.1) when compared to first ART studies (18.1 ± 4.6; p < 0.001). RoB was low in four studies, unclear in 11, and high in 21. Adherence of the papers to the CONSORT recommendations was not fully achieved and most of the papers had unclear and high RoB (PROSPERO registration #CRD42020201460).Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242022000100401Brazilian Oral Research v.36 2022reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWambier,Letícia MariaGonçalves,Angela da RosWambier,Denise StadlerReis,AlessandraChibinski,Ana Cláudia Rodrigueseng2022-02-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242022000100401Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2022-02-07T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics |
title |
Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics |
spellingShingle |
Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics Wambier,Letícia Maria Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Systematic Review Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short |
Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics |
title_full |
Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics |
title_fullStr |
Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics |
title_sort |
Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on ART restorations in children: current status and reporting characteristics |
author |
Wambier,Letícia Maria |
author_facet |
Wambier,Letícia Maria Gonçalves,Angela da Ros Wambier,Denise Stadler Reis,Alessandra Chibinski,Ana Cláudia Rodrigues |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gonçalves,Angela da Ros Wambier,Denise Stadler Reis,Alessandra Chibinski,Ana Cláudia Rodrigues |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Wambier,Letícia Maria Gonçalves,Angela da Ros Wambier,Denise Stadler Reis,Alessandra Chibinski,Ana Cláudia Rodrigues |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Systematic Review Randomized Controlled Trial |
topic |
Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Systematic Review Randomized Controlled Trial |
description |
Abstract: Appropriate research reports are important to facilitate the evaluation of studies and the decision-making by dentists and policymakers. This meta-research study assessed the conformity of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations with the CONSORT recommendations and their risk of bias (RoB). Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, BBO, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from April 2019 to June 2021 for RCTs that assessed the longevity of ART restorations in children. A specific tool was used to assess adherence to the CONSORT recommendations; RoB was evaluated with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Descriptive analyses included the number of studies by journal, follow-up period, country, and quality assessments. A total of 2,181 papers were retrieved and 36 of them were analyzed qualitatively. The overall CONSORT mean score (CONms) was 22.52 ± 6.17 out of 32 points. The best described items were intervention and outcomes, whereas allocation concealment was described in only 22% of the papers. Significant differences in CONms were detected in the analysis by country and publication dates. High CONms were observed in recently published papers (26.7 ± 3.1) when compared to first ART studies (18.1 ± 4.6; p < 0.001). RoB was low in four studies, unclear in 11, and high in 21. Adherence of the papers to the CONSORT recommendations was not fully achieved and most of the papers had unclear and high RoB (PROSPERO registration #CRD42020201460). |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242022000100401 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242022000100401 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0017 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research v.36 2022 reponame:Brazilian Oral Research instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) instacron:SBPQO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
instacron_str |
SBPQO |
institution |
SBPQO |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
collection |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318328537153536 |