Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: DEMARCO,Flávio Fernando
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: COLLARES,Kauê, CORREA,Marcos Britto, CENCI,Maximiliano Sergio, MORAES,Rafael Ratto de, OPDAM,Niek Johannes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242017000500201
Resumo: Abstract Composites resins have become the first choice for direct anterior and posterior restorations. The great popularity is related to their esthetic appearance and reduced need of sound tissue removal as compared with former treatments. Several studies have demonstrated that composite restorations may last long in clinical service. In this review we discuss the factors playing a role on the long-term longevity. Composite restorations have demonstrated a good clinical performance with annual failure rates varying from 1% to 3% in posterior teeth and 1% to 5% in anterior teeth. Factors related to the patients such as caries risk and occlusal stress risk, in addition to socioeconomic factors, may affect the survival significantly. Characteristics of the clinical operators, particularly their decision making when it comes to observing or approaching an existing restoration, are decisive for longevity. Cavity features such as the number of restored walls, composite volume, and presence of endodontic treatment are of major importance and may dictate the service time of the restorative approach. The choice of restorative composite seems to have a minor effect on longevity provided that appropriate technical procedures are used. The main reasons for failure in posterior teeth are secondary caries and fracture (restoration or tooth/restoration), while in anterior teeth esthetic concerns are the main reasons leading to restoration failures. Composite resin restorations can be considered a reliable treatment as long as both the professional and the patient are aware of the factors involved in restoration failures.
id SBPQO-1_a96c7928d1425043d4ba52d3f48103c9
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242017000500201
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?Clinical StudyLongevityComposite ResinsDental RestorationAbstract Composites resins have become the first choice for direct anterior and posterior restorations. The great popularity is related to their esthetic appearance and reduced need of sound tissue removal as compared with former treatments. Several studies have demonstrated that composite restorations may last long in clinical service. In this review we discuss the factors playing a role on the long-term longevity. Composite restorations have demonstrated a good clinical performance with annual failure rates varying from 1% to 3% in posterior teeth and 1% to 5% in anterior teeth. Factors related to the patients such as caries risk and occlusal stress risk, in addition to socioeconomic factors, may affect the survival significantly. Characteristics of the clinical operators, particularly their decision making when it comes to observing or approaching an existing restoration, are decisive for longevity. Cavity features such as the number of restored walls, composite volume, and presence of endodontic treatment are of major importance and may dictate the service time of the restorative approach. The choice of restorative composite seems to have a minor effect on longevity provided that appropriate technical procedures are used. The main reasons for failure in posterior teeth are secondary caries and fracture (restoration or tooth/restoration), while in anterior teeth esthetic concerns are the main reasons leading to restoration failures. Composite resin restorations can be considered a reliable treatment as long as both the professional and the patient are aware of the factors involved in restoration failures.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242017000500201Brazilian Oral Research v.31 suppl.1 2017reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0056info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDEMARCO,Flávio FernandoCOLLARES,KauêCORREA,Marcos BrittoCENCI,Maximiliano SergioMORAES,Rafael Ratto deOPDAM,Niek Johanneseng2017-08-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242017000500201Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2017-08-23T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?
title Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?
spellingShingle Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?
DEMARCO,Flávio Fernando
Clinical Study
Longevity
Composite Resins
Dental Restoration
title_short Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?
title_full Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?
title_fullStr Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?
title_full_unstemmed Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?
title_sort Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?
author DEMARCO,Flávio Fernando
author_facet DEMARCO,Flávio Fernando
COLLARES,Kauê
CORREA,Marcos Britto
CENCI,Maximiliano Sergio
MORAES,Rafael Ratto de
OPDAM,Niek Johannes
author_role author
author2 COLLARES,Kauê
CORREA,Marcos Britto
CENCI,Maximiliano Sergio
MORAES,Rafael Ratto de
OPDAM,Niek Johannes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv DEMARCO,Flávio Fernando
COLLARES,Kauê
CORREA,Marcos Britto
CENCI,Maximiliano Sergio
MORAES,Rafael Ratto de
OPDAM,Niek Johannes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Clinical Study
Longevity
Composite Resins
Dental Restoration
topic Clinical Study
Longevity
Composite Resins
Dental Restoration
description Abstract Composites resins have become the first choice for direct anterior and posterior restorations. The great popularity is related to their esthetic appearance and reduced need of sound tissue removal as compared with former treatments. Several studies have demonstrated that composite restorations may last long in clinical service. In this review we discuss the factors playing a role on the long-term longevity. Composite restorations have demonstrated a good clinical performance with annual failure rates varying from 1% to 3% in posterior teeth and 1% to 5% in anterior teeth. Factors related to the patients such as caries risk and occlusal stress risk, in addition to socioeconomic factors, may affect the survival significantly. Characteristics of the clinical operators, particularly their decision making when it comes to observing or approaching an existing restoration, are decisive for longevity. Cavity features such as the number of restored walls, composite volume, and presence of endodontic treatment are of major importance and may dictate the service time of the restorative approach. The choice of restorative composite seems to have a minor effect on longevity provided that appropriate technical procedures are used. The main reasons for failure in posterior teeth are secondary caries and fracture (restoration or tooth/restoration), while in anterior teeth esthetic concerns are the main reasons leading to restoration failures. Composite resin restorations can be considered a reliable treatment as long as both the professional and the patient are aware of the factors involved in restoration failures.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242017000500201
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242017000500201
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0056
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.31 suppl.1 2017
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318325672443904