A randomized double blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel 1 year follow up

• Autor(a) principal: Souza, Fábio Herrmann Coelho de
• Data de Publicação: 2012
• Outros Autores: Camargo, Junara Cristina, Beskow, Thiago, Balestrin, Matheus Dalmolin, Klein Junior, Celso Afonso, Demarco, Flávio Fernando
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFPel - Guaiaca
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufpel.edu.br/handle/ri/811
• topic: Clinical trial; Composite resins; Bevel; Dental restoration, permanent

Objective: This randomized double-blind clinical trial compared the performance of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel, after 1-year follow-up. Material and Methods: Thirteen volunteers requiring at least two posterior composite restorations were selected. Twenty-nine cavities were performed, comprising 14 without bevel (butt joint) and 15 with bevel preparation of the enamel cavosurface angle. All cavities were P60). A halogen light curing unit was used through the study. Restorations were polished immediately. Analysis was carried out at baseline, after 6 months and after 1 year by a calibrated evaluator (Kappa), according to the FDI criteria. Data were statistically analyzedby Mann-Whitney test (p<0.05). Results: Beveled and non-beveled cavities performed similarly after 1 year follow-up, regarding to fractures and retention, marginal adaptation,postoperative hypersensitivity, recurrence of caries, surface luster and anatomic form performance (p<0.05) than butt joint restorations. Conclusions: It was concluded that the restorations were acceptable after 1 year, but restorations placed in cavities with marginal beveling showed less marginal staining than those placed in non-beveled cavities.