An in vitro comparison of the force decay generated by different commercially available elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos,Ana Cristina Soares
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Tortamano,André, Naccarato,Sandra Regina Frazatto, Dominguez-Rodriguez,Gladys Cristina, Vigorito,Julio Wilson
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242007000100009
Resumo: This in vitro study was designed to compare the forces generated by commercially available elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springs, and to determine their force decay pattern. Forty elastomeric chains and forty NiTi closed coil springs were divided into 4 groups according to the following manufacturers: (1) Morelli®, (2) Abzil®, (3) TP Orthodontics® and (4) American Orthodontics®. The specimens were extended to twice their original length and stored in artificial saliva at 37°C. Initial force was measured by means of an Instron universal testing machine and then at 1, 4, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. The results revealed that the elastomeric chains delivered a mean initial force of 347 g for Morelli®, 351 g for American Orthodontics®, 402 g for Abzil®, and 404 g for TP Orthodontics®. The NiTi closed coil springs generated a mean initial force of 196 g for American Orthodontics®, 208 g for TP Orthodontics®, 216 g for Abzil®, and 223 g for Morelli®. The mean percentage of force decay observed after 28 days for the elastomeric chains was 37.4% for TP Orthodontics®, 48.1% for American Orthodontics®, 65.4% for Morelli®, and 71.6% for Abzil®. After 28 days, the NiTi closed coil springs presented a mean percentage of force decay of 22.6% for American Orthodontics®, 29.8% for Abzil®, 30.6% for Morelli®, and 45.8% for TP Orthodontics®. At the end of the study, significant differences were observed between the elastomeric chains and the NiTi closed coil springs. The results indicated that the studied NiTi closed coil springs are more adequate for dental movement than the elastomeric chains.
id SBPQO-1_ef999854500d2a3d311604d07f40c510
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242007000100009
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling An in vitro comparison of the force decay generated by different commercially available elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springsOrthodontics, correctiveOrthodontic appliance designThis in vitro study was designed to compare the forces generated by commercially available elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springs, and to determine their force decay pattern. Forty elastomeric chains and forty NiTi closed coil springs were divided into 4 groups according to the following manufacturers: (1) Morelli®, (2) Abzil®, (3) TP Orthodontics® and (4) American Orthodontics®. The specimens were extended to twice their original length and stored in artificial saliva at 37°C. Initial force was measured by means of an Instron universal testing machine and then at 1, 4, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. The results revealed that the elastomeric chains delivered a mean initial force of 347 g for Morelli®, 351 g for American Orthodontics®, 402 g for Abzil®, and 404 g for TP Orthodontics®. The NiTi closed coil springs generated a mean initial force of 196 g for American Orthodontics®, 208 g for TP Orthodontics®, 216 g for Abzil®, and 223 g for Morelli®. The mean percentage of force decay observed after 28 days for the elastomeric chains was 37.4% for TP Orthodontics®, 48.1% for American Orthodontics®, 65.4% for Morelli®, and 71.6% for Abzil®. After 28 days, the NiTi closed coil springs presented a mean percentage of force decay of 22.6% for American Orthodontics®, 29.8% for Abzil®, 30.6% for Morelli®, and 45.8% for TP Orthodontics®. At the end of the study, significant differences were observed between the elastomeric chains and the NiTi closed coil springs. The results indicated that the studied NiTi closed coil springs are more adequate for dental movement than the elastomeric chains.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2007-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242007000100009Brazilian Oral Research v.21 n.1 2007reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/S1806-83242007000100009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,Ana Cristina SoaresTortamano,AndréNaccarato,Sandra Regina FrazattoDominguez-Rodriguez,Gladys CristinaVigorito,Julio Wilsoneng2007-03-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242007000100009Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2007-03-23T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv An in vitro comparison of the force decay generated by different commercially available elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springs
title An in vitro comparison of the force decay generated by different commercially available elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springs
spellingShingle An in vitro comparison of the force decay generated by different commercially available elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springs
Santos,Ana Cristina Soares
Orthodontics, corrective
Orthodontic appliance design
title_short An in vitro comparison of the force decay generated by different commercially available elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springs
title_full An in vitro comparison of the force decay generated by different commercially available elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springs
title_fullStr An in vitro comparison of the force decay generated by different commercially available elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springs
title_full_unstemmed An in vitro comparison of the force decay generated by different commercially available elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springs
title_sort An in vitro comparison of the force decay generated by different commercially available elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springs
author Santos,Ana Cristina Soares
author_facet Santos,Ana Cristina Soares
Tortamano,André
Naccarato,Sandra Regina Frazatto
Dominguez-Rodriguez,Gladys Cristina
Vigorito,Julio Wilson
author_role author
author2 Tortamano,André
Naccarato,Sandra Regina Frazatto
Dominguez-Rodriguez,Gladys Cristina
Vigorito,Julio Wilson
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos,Ana Cristina Soares
Tortamano,André
Naccarato,Sandra Regina Frazatto
Dominguez-Rodriguez,Gladys Cristina
Vigorito,Julio Wilson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Orthodontics, corrective
Orthodontic appliance design
topic Orthodontics, corrective
Orthodontic appliance design
description This in vitro study was designed to compare the forces generated by commercially available elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springs, and to determine their force decay pattern. Forty elastomeric chains and forty NiTi closed coil springs were divided into 4 groups according to the following manufacturers: (1) Morelli®, (2) Abzil®, (3) TP Orthodontics® and (4) American Orthodontics®. The specimens were extended to twice their original length and stored in artificial saliva at 37°C. Initial force was measured by means of an Instron universal testing machine and then at 1, 4, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. The results revealed that the elastomeric chains delivered a mean initial force of 347 g for Morelli®, 351 g for American Orthodontics®, 402 g for Abzil®, and 404 g for TP Orthodontics®. The NiTi closed coil springs generated a mean initial force of 196 g for American Orthodontics®, 208 g for TP Orthodontics®, 216 g for Abzil®, and 223 g for Morelli®. The mean percentage of force decay observed after 28 days for the elastomeric chains was 37.4% for TP Orthodontics®, 48.1% for American Orthodontics®, 65.4% for Morelli®, and 71.6% for Abzil®. After 28 days, the NiTi closed coil springs presented a mean percentage of force decay of 22.6% for American Orthodontics®, 29.8% for Abzil®, 30.6% for Morelli®, and 45.8% for TP Orthodontics®. At the end of the study, significant differences were observed between the elastomeric chains and the NiTi closed coil springs. The results indicated that the studied NiTi closed coil springs are more adequate for dental movement than the elastomeric chains.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242007000100009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242007000100009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1806-83242007000100009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.21 n.1 2007
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318320826974208