Protective mechanical ventilation in patients with risk factors for ARDS: prospective cohort study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bastos-Netto,Cristiane
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Reboredo,Maycon Moura, Vieira,Rodrigo Souza, Fonseca,Lídia Maria Carneiro da, Carvalho,Erich Vidal, Holanda,Marcelo Alcantara, Pinheiro,Bruno Valle
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132021000100203
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the association that protective mechanical ventilation (MV), based on VT and maximum distending pressure (MDP), has with mortality in patients at risk for ARDS. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study conducted in an ICU and including 116 patients on MV who had at least one risk factor for the development of ARDS. Ventilatory parameters were collected twice a day for seven days, and patients were divided into two groups (protective MV and nonprotective MV) based on the MDP (difference between maximum airway pressure and PEEP) or VT. The outcome measures were 28-day mortality, ICU mortality, and in-hospital mortality. The risk factors associated with the adoption of nonprotective MV were also assessed. Results: Nonprotective MV based on VT and MDP was applied in 49 (42.2%) and 38 (32.8%) of the patients, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression showed that protective MV based on MDP was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.19-0.73) and lower ICU mortality (hazard ratio = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.19-0.85), after adjustment for age, Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3, and vasopressor use, as well as the baseline values for PaO2/FiO2 ratio, PEEP, pH, and PaCO2. These associations were not observed when nonprotective MV was based on the VT. Conclusions: The MDP seems to be a useful tool, better than VT, for adjusting MV in patients at risk for ARDS.
id SBPT-1_a0fd2dbac08ebdd48ca21ac2ccef513e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-37132021000100203
network_acronym_str SBPT-1
network_name_str Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Protective mechanical ventilation in patients with risk factors for ARDS: prospective cohort studyRespiration, artificialTidal volumeRespiratory distress syndrome, adultABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the association that protective mechanical ventilation (MV), based on VT and maximum distending pressure (MDP), has with mortality in patients at risk for ARDS. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study conducted in an ICU and including 116 patients on MV who had at least one risk factor for the development of ARDS. Ventilatory parameters were collected twice a day for seven days, and patients were divided into two groups (protective MV and nonprotective MV) based on the MDP (difference between maximum airway pressure and PEEP) or VT. The outcome measures were 28-day mortality, ICU mortality, and in-hospital mortality. The risk factors associated with the adoption of nonprotective MV were also assessed. Results: Nonprotective MV based on VT and MDP was applied in 49 (42.2%) and 38 (32.8%) of the patients, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression showed that protective MV based on MDP was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.19-0.73) and lower ICU mortality (hazard ratio = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.19-0.85), after adjustment for age, Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3, and vasopressor use, as well as the baseline values for PaO2/FiO2 ratio, PEEP, pH, and PaCO2. These associations were not observed when nonprotective MV was based on the VT. Conclusions: The MDP seems to be a useful tool, better than VT, for adjusting MV in patients at risk for ARDS.Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132021000100203Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia v.47 n.1 2021reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)instacron:SBPT10.36416/1806-3756/e20200360info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBastos-Netto,CristianeReboredo,Maycon MouraVieira,Rodrigo SouzaFonseca,Lídia Maria Carneiro daCarvalho,Erich VidalHolanda,Marcelo AlcantaraPinheiro,Bruno Valleeng2021-01-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-37132021000100203Revistahttp://www.jornaldepneumologia.com.br/default.aspONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jbp@jbp.org.br|| jpneumo@jornaldepneumologia.com.br1806-37561806-3713opendoar:2021-01-05T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Protective mechanical ventilation in patients with risk factors for ARDS: prospective cohort study
title Protective mechanical ventilation in patients with risk factors for ARDS: prospective cohort study
spellingShingle Protective mechanical ventilation in patients with risk factors for ARDS: prospective cohort study
Bastos-Netto,Cristiane
Respiration, artificial
Tidal volume
Respiratory distress syndrome, adult
title_short Protective mechanical ventilation in patients with risk factors for ARDS: prospective cohort study
title_full Protective mechanical ventilation in patients with risk factors for ARDS: prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Protective mechanical ventilation in patients with risk factors for ARDS: prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Protective mechanical ventilation in patients with risk factors for ARDS: prospective cohort study
title_sort Protective mechanical ventilation in patients with risk factors for ARDS: prospective cohort study
author Bastos-Netto,Cristiane
author_facet Bastos-Netto,Cristiane
Reboredo,Maycon Moura
Vieira,Rodrigo Souza
Fonseca,Lídia Maria Carneiro da
Carvalho,Erich Vidal
Holanda,Marcelo Alcantara
Pinheiro,Bruno Valle
author_role author
author2 Reboredo,Maycon Moura
Vieira,Rodrigo Souza
Fonseca,Lídia Maria Carneiro da
Carvalho,Erich Vidal
Holanda,Marcelo Alcantara
Pinheiro,Bruno Valle
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bastos-Netto,Cristiane
Reboredo,Maycon Moura
Vieira,Rodrigo Souza
Fonseca,Lídia Maria Carneiro da
Carvalho,Erich Vidal
Holanda,Marcelo Alcantara
Pinheiro,Bruno Valle
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Respiration, artificial
Tidal volume
Respiratory distress syndrome, adult
topic Respiration, artificial
Tidal volume
Respiratory distress syndrome, adult
description ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the association that protective mechanical ventilation (MV), based on VT and maximum distending pressure (MDP), has with mortality in patients at risk for ARDS. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study conducted in an ICU and including 116 patients on MV who had at least one risk factor for the development of ARDS. Ventilatory parameters were collected twice a day for seven days, and patients were divided into two groups (protective MV and nonprotective MV) based on the MDP (difference between maximum airway pressure and PEEP) or VT. The outcome measures were 28-day mortality, ICU mortality, and in-hospital mortality. The risk factors associated with the adoption of nonprotective MV were also assessed. Results: Nonprotective MV based on VT and MDP was applied in 49 (42.2%) and 38 (32.8%) of the patients, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression showed that protective MV based on MDP was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.19-0.73) and lower ICU mortality (hazard ratio = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.19-0.85), after adjustment for age, Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3, and vasopressor use, as well as the baseline values for PaO2/FiO2 ratio, PEEP, pH, and PaCO2. These associations were not observed when nonprotective MV was based on the VT. Conclusions: The MDP seems to be a useful tool, better than VT, for adjusting MV in patients at risk for ARDS.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132021000100203
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132021000100203
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.36416/1806-3756/e20200360
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia v.47 n.1 2021
reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
instacron:SBPT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
instacron_str SBPT
institution SBPT
reponame_str Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
collection Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jbp@jbp.org.br|| jpneumo@jornaldepneumologia.com.br
_version_ 1750318347869749248