Cypsela or achene? Refining terminology by considering anatomical and historical factors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marzinek,Juliana
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: De-Paula,Orlando Cavalari, Oliveira,Denise Maria Trombert
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Botany
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-84042008000300018
Resumo: The worry about the indiscriminate use of the terms cypsela and achene for the fruits of Asteraceae has been frequently detached by specialists in this family. The present work was developed aiming to verify the existence of arguments to justify the adoption of a term against the other. After historical and anatomical analysis, we concluded that there is technical basis to consider cypsela and achene as different types of fruits. For Asteraceae, the correct is to call cypsela; achenes are only derived from superior ovaries, as in Plumbaginaceae.
id SBSP-1_36f0efb679a21622629caaa615faea5c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-84042008000300018
network_acronym_str SBSP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Botany
repository_id_str
spelling Cypsela or achene? Refining terminology by considering anatomical and historical factorsAcheneasteraceaecypselafruitThe worry about the indiscriminate use of the terms cypsela and achene for the fruits of Asteraceae has been frequently detached by specialists in this family. The present work was developed aiming to verify the existence of arguments to justify the adoption of a term against the other. After historical and anatomical analysis, we concluded that there is technical basis to consider cypsela and achene as different types of fruits. For Asteraceae, the correct is to call cypsela; achenes are only derived from superior ovaries, as in Plumbaginaceae.Sociedade Botânica de São Paulo2008-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-84042008000300018Brazilian Journal of Botany v.31 n.3 2008reponame:Brazilian Journal of Botanyinstname:Sociedade Botânica de São Paulo (SBSP)instacron:SBSP10.1590/S0100-84042008000300018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarzinek,JulianaDe-Paula,Orlando CavalariOliveira,Denise Maria Tromberteng2009-01-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-84042008000300018Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbb/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbrazbot@gmail.com||brazbot@gmail.com1806-99590100-8404opendoar:2009-01-21T00:00Brazilian Journal of Botany - Sociedade Botânica de São Paulo (SBSP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cypsela or achene? Refining terminology by considering anatomical and historical factors
title Cypsela or achene? Refining terminology by considering anatomical and historical factors
spellingShingle Cypsela or achene? Refining terminology by considering anatomical and historical factors
Marzinek,Juliana
Achene
asteraceae
cypsela
fruit
title_short Cypsela or achene? Refining terminology by considering anatomical and historical factors
title_full Cypsela or achene? Refining terminology by considering anatomical and historical factors
title_fullStr Cypsela or achene? Refining terminology by considering anatomical and historical factors
title_full_unstemmed Cypsela or achene? Refining terminology by considering anatomical and historical factors
title_sort Cypsela or achene? Refining terminology by considering anatomical and historical factors
author Marzinek,Juliana
author_facet Marzinek,Juliana
De-Paula,Orlando Cavalari
Oliveira,Denise Maria Trombert
author_role author
author2 De-Paula,Orlando Cavalari
Oliveira,Denise Maria Trombert
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marzinek,Juliana
De-Paula,Orlando Cavalari
Oliveira,Denise Maria Trombert
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Achene
asteraceae
cypsela
fruit
topic Achene
asteraceae
cypsela
fruit
description The worry about the indiscriminate use of the terms cypsela and achene for the fruits of Asteraceae has been frequently detached by specialists in this family. The present work was developed aiming to verify the existence of arguments to justify the adoption of a term against the other. After historical and anatomical analysis, we concluded that there is technical basis to consider cypsela and achene as different types of fruits. For Asteraceae, the correct is to call cypsela; achenes are only derived from superior ovaries, as in Plumbaginaceae.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-84042008000300018
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-84042008000300018
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-84042008000300018
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Botânica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Botânica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Botany v.31 n.3 2008
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Botany
instname:Sociedade Botânica de São Paulo (SBSP)
instacron:SBSP
instname_str Sociedade Botânica de São Paulo (SBSP)
instacron_str SBSP
institution SBSP
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Botany
collection Brazilian Journal of Botany
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Botany - Sociedade Botânica de São Paulo (SBSP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brazbot@gmail.com||brazbot@gmail.com
_version_ 1754734839831986176

Registros relacionados