Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Esteves,Sandro C.
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382014000400433
Resumo: Semen analysis is the corner stone of infertility evaluation as it provides information on the functional status of the seminiferous tubules, epididymis and accessory sex glands. The methods on how the human semen should be evaluated are provided by the World Health Organization, which periodically releases manuals that include specific protocols and reference standards. In 2010, the WHO published new criteria for human semen characteristics that were markedly lower than those previously reported. In this review initially it is discussed the limitations of semen analysis as a surrogate measure of a man’s ability to father a pregnancy. Secondly, it is analyzed methodology issues that could explain why the newly released reference values were different from those earlier reported. Thirdly, it is speculated on the likely effects of the 2010 WHO criteria in the management of male infertility. Due to the several inherent limitations of semen analysis as a surrogate marker of male infertility, physicians should exercise caution when interpreting results. A template for semen analysis reports that incorporates the distribution of the semen characteristics of recent fathers in centiles rather than solely the minimum thresholds could aid clinicians to better understand how a given patient results compare with the reference population. Importantly, a male infertility evaluation must go far beyond a simple semen analysis, as it has to be complemented with a proper physical examination, a comprehensive history taking, and relevant endocrine, genetic, and other investigations.
id SBU-1_68523b0133f2bbb87a1c6aa894785928
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382014000400433
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examinationInfertility, MaleSemen AnalysisAndrologyDiagnosisSpermatozoaReference ValuesTherapeuticsSemen analysis is the corner stone of infertility evaluation as it provides information on the functional status of the seminiferous tubules, epididymis and accessory sex glands. The methods on how the human semen should be evaluated are provided by the World Health Organization, which periodically releases manuals that include specific protocols and reference standards. In 2010, the WHO published new criteria for human semen characteristics that were markedly lower than those previously reported. In this review initially it is discussed the limitations of semen analysis as a surrogate measure of a man’s ability to father a pregnancy. Secondly, it is analyzed methodology issues that could explain why the newly released reference values were different from those earlier reported. Thirdly, it is speculated on the likely effects of the 2010 WHO criteria in the management of male infertility. Due to the several inherent limitations of semen analysis as a surrogate marker of male infertility, physicians should exercise caution when interpreting results. A template for semen analysis reports that incorporates the distribution of the semen characteristics of recent fathers in centiles rather than solely the minimum thresholds could aid clinicians to better understand how a given patient results compare with the reference population. Importantly, a male infertility evaluation must go far beyond a simple semen analysis, as it has to be complemented with a proper physical examination, a comprehensive history taking, and relevant endocrine, genetic, and other investigations.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2014-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382014000400433International braz j urol v.40 n.4 2014reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.04.02info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsteves,Sandro C.eng2014-10-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382014000400433Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2014-10-03T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination
title Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination
spellingShingle Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination
Esteves,Sandro C.
Infertility, Male
Semen Analysis
Andrology
Diagnosis
Spermatozoa
Reference Values
Therapeutics
title_short Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination
title_full Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination
title_fullStr Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination
title_full_unstemmed Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination
title_sort Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination
author Esteves,Sandro C.
author_facet Esteves,Sandro C.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Esteves,Sandro C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Infertility, Male
Semen Analysis
Andrology
Diagnosis
Spermatozoa
Reference Values
Therapeutics
topic Infertility, Male
Semen Analysis
Andrology
Diagnosis
Spermatozoa
Reference Values
Therapeutics
description Semen analysis is the corner stone of infertility evaluation as it provides information on the functional status of the seminiferous tubules, epididymis and accessory sex glands. The methods on how the human semen should be evaluated are provided by the World Health Organization, which periodically releases manuals that include specific protocols and reference standards. In 2010, the WHO published new criteria for human semen characteristics that were markedly lower than those previously reported. In this review initially it is discussed the limitations of semen analysis as a surrogate measure of a man’s ability to father a pregnancy. Secondly, it is analyzed methodology issues that could explain why the newly released reference values were different from those earlier reported. Thirdly, it is speculated on the likely effects of the 2010 WHO criteria in the management of male infertility. Due to the several inherent limitations of semen analysis as a surrogate marker of male infertility, physicians should exercise caution when interpreting results. A template for semen analysis reports that incorporates the distribution of the semen characteristics of recent fathers in centiles rather than solely the minimum thresholds could aid clinicians to better understand how a given patient results compare with the reference population. Importantly, a male infertility evaluation must go far beyond a simple semen analysis, as it has to be complemented with a proper physical examination, a comprehensive history taking, and relevant endocrine, genetic, and other investigations.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382014000400433
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382014000400433
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.04.02
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.40 n.4 2014
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318073689145344