Complete supine PCNL: ultrasound vs. fluoroscopic guided: a randomized clinical trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Falahatkar,Siavash
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Allahkhah,Aliakbar, Kazemzadeh,Majid, Enshaei,Ahmad, Shakiba,Maryam, Moghaddas,Fahimeh
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000400710
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction and Hypothesis: To compare complications and outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (csPCNL) with ultrasound guided and fluoroscopically guided procedure. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial study from January 2009 to September 2010, 26 of 51 patients with renal stones underwent csPCNL with ultrasonographic guidance in all steps of the procedure (group A), and the other 25 patients underwent standard fluoroscopically guided csPCNL (group B). All of the patients underwent PCNL in the complete supine position. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS16 software. Results: Mean BMI was 28.14 in group A and 26.31 in group B (p=0.30). The mean stone burden was 26.48 and 30.44 in groups A and B, respectively (p=0.20). The stone free rate was 88.5% in group A and 75.5% in group B, that was no significant (p=0.16). Overall 2 patients (7.7%) in group A and 6 patients (24%) in group B had complications (p=0.11). Mean operative time in group A was 88.46 minutes, and in group B it was 79.58 minutes (p=0.39). Mean hospital stay was 69.70 and 61.79 hours in group A and B, respectively (p=0.22). There was no visceral injury in groups. Conclusions: This randomized study showed that totally ultrasonic had the same outcomes of fluoroscopically csPCNL. Ultrasonography can be an alternative rather than fluoroscopy in PCNL. We believe that more randomized studies are needed to allow endourologists to use sonography rather than fluoroscopy in order to avoid exposition to radiation.
id SBU-1_a023f1ba5c72958e26cef4257a82d536
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382016000400710
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Complete supine PCNL: ultrasound vs. fluoroscopic guided: a randomized clinical trialNephrostomy, PercutaneousUltrasonographyFluoroscopySupine PositionABSTRACT Introduction and Hypothesis: To compare complications and outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (csPCNL) with ultrasound guided and fluoroscopically guided procedure. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial study from January 2009 to September 2010, 26 of 51 patients with renal stones underwent csPCNL with ultrasonographic guidance in all steps of the procedure (group A), and the other 25 patients underwent standard fluoroscopically guided csPCNL (group B). All of the patients underwent PCNL in the complete supine position. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS16 software. Results: Mean BMI was 28.14 in group A and 26.31 in group B (p=0.30). The mean stone burden was 26.48 and 30.44 in groups A and B, respectively (p=0.20). The stone free rate was 88.5% in group A and 75.5% in group B, that was no significant (p=0.16). Overall 2 patients (7.7%) in group A and 6 patients (24%) in group B had complications (p=0.11). Mean operative time in group A was 88.46 minutes, and in group B it was 79.58 minutes (p=0.39). Mean hospital stay was 69.70 and 61.79 hours in group A and B, respectively (p=0.22). There was no visceral injury in groups. Conclusions: This randomized study showed that totally ultrasonic had the same outcomes of fluoroscopically csPCNL. Ultrasonography can be an alternative rather than fluoroscopy in PCNL. We believe that more randomized studies are needed to allow endourologists to use sonography rather than fluoroscopy in order to avoid exposition to radiation.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000400710International braz j urol v.42 n.4 2016reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0291info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFalahatkar,SiavashAllahkhah,AliakbarKazemzadeh,MajidEnshaei,AhmadShakiba,MaryamMoghaddas,Fahimeheng2016-09-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382016000400710Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2016-09-06T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Complete supine PCNL: ultrasound vs. fluoroscopic guided: a randomized clinical trial
title Complete supine PCNL: ultrasound vs. fluoroscopic guided: a randomized clinical trial
spellingShingle Complete supine PCNL: ultrasound vs. fluoroscopic guided: a randomized clinical trial
Falahatkar,Siavash
Nephrostomy, Percutaneous
Ultrasonography
Fluoroscopy
Supine Position
title_short Complete supine PCNL: ultrasound vs. fluoroscopic guided: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Complete supine PCNL: ultrasound vs. fluoroscopic guided: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Complete supine PCNL: ultrasound vs. fluoroscopic guided: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Complete supine PCNL: ultrasound vs. fluoroscopic guided: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort Complete supine PCNL: ultrasound vs. fluoroscopic guided: a randomized clinical trial
author Falahatkar,Siavash
author_facet Falahatkar,Siavash
Allahkhah,Aliakbar
Kazemzadeh,Majid
Enshaei,Ahmad
Shakiba,Maryam
Moghaddas,Fahimeh
author_role author
author2 Allahkhah,Aliakbar
Kazemzadeh,Majid
Enshaei,Ahmad
Shakiba,Maryam
Moghaddas,Fahimeh
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Falahatkar,Siavash
Allahkhah,Aliakbar
Kazemzadeh,Majid
Enshaei,Ahmad
Shakiba,Maryam
Moghaddas,Fahimeh
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Nephrostomy, Percutaneous
Ultrasonography
Fluoroscopy
Supine Position
topic Nephrostomy, Percutaneous
Ultrasonography
Fluoroscopy
Supine Position
description ABSTRACT Introduction and Hypothesis: To compare complications and outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (csPCNL) with ultrasound guided and fluoroscopically guided procedure. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial study from January 2009 to September 2010, 26 of 51 patients with renal stones underwent csPCNL with ultrasonographic guidance in all steps of the procedure (group A), and the other 25 patients underwent standard fluoroscopically guided csPCNL (group B). All of the patients underwent PCNL in the complete supine position. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS16 software. Results: Mean BMI was 28.14 in group A and 26.31 in group B (p=0.30). The mean stone burden was 26.48 and 30.44 in groups A and B, respectively (p=0.20). The stone free rate was 88.5% in group A and 75.5% in group B, that was no significant (p=0.16). Overall 2 patients (7.7%) in group A and 6 patients (24%) in group B had complications (p=0.11). Mean operative time in group A was 88.46 minutes, and in group B it was 79.58 minutes (p=0.39). Mean hospital stay was 69.70 and 61.79 hours in group A and B, respectively (p=0.22). There was no visceral injury in groups. Conclusions: This randomized study showed that totally ultrasonic had the same outcomes of fluoroscopically csPCNL. Ultrasonography can be an alternative rather than fluoroscopy in PCNL. We believe that more randomized studies are needed to allow endourologists to use sonography rather than fluoroscopy in order to avoid exposition to radiation.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000400710
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000400710
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0291
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.42 n.4 2016
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318074977845248