Radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy in patients over 80 years old

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Labanaris,Apostolos P.
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Zugor,Vahudin, Labanaris,Agapi P., Elias,Polykandriotis, Kühn,Reinhard
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382010000200003
Resumo: PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to discover if elderly patients exhibit comparable outcomes and survival benefits to those achieved in younger patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed 35 patients over 80 years old treated by radical nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy for malignant and inflammatory conditions within the previous 4 years. A multivariate analysis regarding survival and recovery was conducted and included various preoperative parameters. The subjective opinion of patients or patient's relatives (in cases where the patient had past away) was estimated by answering the following questions: (a) are you satisfied with your decision to undergo the operation? (b) would you undergo it once more if needed? (c) would you advise it to a patient your age? RESULTS: The median age was 83.5 years. Radical nephrectomy with a flank approach was performed in 65.7% of cases and nephroureterectomy with a transabdominal approach in 34.3% of cases. The median recovery was 13 weeks. During a median follow-up of 31 months (range 12 to 53), 80% of patients were disease free. The remaining 20% passed away demonstrating a median survival of 25 months (range 13-38). Eighty-eight percent of patients were satisfied with their decision to undergo the operation, 91.4% would undergo it once more if needed and 91.4% would advise it to a patient their age. CONCLUSIONS: Radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy are safe and effective in well-selected patients over 80 years old. Elderly patients exhibit comparable preoperative outcomes and survival benefits to those achieved in younger patients. Various preoperative clinical variables that effect the survival of patients but not their recovery could be identified.
id SBU-1_ad0803bc40255790ab0943c90d6f3732
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382010000200003
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy in patients over 80 years oldrenal neoplasmsmorbiditymortalityprognosisconvalescencepatient satisfactionPURPOSE: The aim of this study was to discover if elderly patients exhibit comparable outcomes and survival benefits to those achieved in younger patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed 35 patients over 80 years old treated by radical nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy for malignant and inflammatory conditions within the previous 4 years. A multivariate analysis regarding survival and recovery was conducted and included various preoperative parameters. The subjective opinion of patients or patient's relatives (in cases where the patient had past away) was estimated by answering the following questions: (a) are you satisfied with your decision to undergo the operation? (b) would you undergo it once more if needed? (c) would you advise it to a patient your age? RESULTS: The median age was 83.5 years. Radical nephrectomy with a flank approach was performed in 65.7% of cases and nephroureterectomy with a transabdominal approach in 34.3% of cases. The median recovery was 13 weeks. During a median follow-up of 31 months (range 12 to 53), 80% of patients were disease free. The remaining 20% passed away demonstrating a median survival of 25 months (range 13-38). Eighty-eight percent of patients were satisfied with their decision to undergo the operation, 91.4% would undergo it once more if needed and 91.4% would advise it to a patient their age. CONCLUSIONS: Radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy are safe and effective in well-selected patients over 80 years old. Elderly patients exhibit comparable preoperative outcomes and survival benefits to those achieved in younger patients. Various preoperative clinical variables that effect the survival of patients but not their recovery could be identified.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2010-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382010000200003International braz j urol v.36 n.2 2010reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-55382010000200003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLabanaris,Apostolos P.Zugor,VahudinLabanaris,Agapi P.Elias,PolykandriotisKühn,Reinhardeng2010-05-31T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382010000200003Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2010-05-31T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy in patients over 80 years old
title Radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy in patients over 80 years old
spellingShingle Radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy in patients over 80 years old
Labanaris,Apostolos P.
renal neoplasms
morbidity
mortality
prognosis
convalescence
patient satisfaction
title_short Radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy in patients over 80 years old
title_full Radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy in patients over 80 years old
title_fullStr Radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy in patients over 80 years old
title_full_unstemmed Radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy in patients over 80 years old
title_sort Radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy in patients over 80 years old
author Labanaris,Apostolos P.
author_facet Labanaris,Apostolos P.
Zugor,Vahudin
Labanaris,Agapi P.
Elias,Polykandriotis
Kühn,Reinhard
author_role author
author2 Zugor,Vahudin
Labanaris,Agapi P.
Elias,Polykandriotis
Kühn,Reinhard
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Labanaris,Apostolos P.
Zugor,Vahudin
Labanaris,Agapi P.
Elias,Polykandriotis
Kühn,Reinhard
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv renal neoplasms
morbidity
mortality
prognosis
convalescence
patient satisfaction
topic renal neoplasms
morbidity
mortality
prognosis
convalescence
patient satisfaction
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to discover if elderly patients exhibit comparable outcomes and survival benefits to those achieved in younger patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed 35 patients over 80 years old treated by radical nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy for malignant and inflammatory conditions within the previous 4 years. A multivariate analysis regarding survival and recovery was conducted and included various preoperative parameters. The subjective opinion of patients or patient's relatives (in cases where the patient had past away) was estimated by answering the following questions: (a) are you satisfied with your decision to undergo the operation? (b) would you undergo it once more if needed? (c) would you advise it to a patient your age? RESULTS: The median age was 83.5 years. Radical nephrectomy with a flank approach was performed in 65.7% of cases and nephroureterectomy with a transabdominal approach in 34.3% of cases. The median recovery was 13 weeks. During a median follow-up of 31 months (range 12 to 53), 80% of patients were disease free. The remaining 20% passed away demonstrating a median survival of 25 months (range 13-38). Eighty-eight percent of patients were satisfied with their decision to undergo the operation, 91.4% would undergo it once more if needed and 91.4% would advise it to a patient their age. CONCLUSIONS: Radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy are safe and effective in well-selected patients over 80 years old. Elderly patients exhibit comparable preoperative outcomes and survival benefits to those achieved in younger patients. Various preoperative clinical variables that effect the survival of patients but not their recovery could be identified.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382010000200003
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382010000200003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-55382010000200003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.36 n.2 2010
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318071619256320