Oncological and functional outcomes of salvage renal surgery following failed primary intervention for renal cell carcinoma

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Abarzua-Cabezas,Fernando G.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Sverrisson,Einar, Cruz,Robert De La, Spiess,Philippe E., Haddock,Peter, Sexton,Wade J.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000100147
Resumo: Purpose To assess the oncologic and functional outcomes of salvage renal surgery following failed primary intervention for RCC. Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery for suspected RCC during 2004-2012. We identified 839 patients, 13 of whom required salvage renal surgery. Demographic data was collected for all patients. Intraoperative and postoperative data included ischemic duration, blood loss and perioperative complications. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included abdominal CT or magnetic resonance imaging, chest CT and routine laboratory work. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. Results The majority (85%) of the patients were male, with an average age of 64 years. Ten patients underwent salvage partial nephrectomy while 3 underwent salvage radical nephrectomy. Cryotherapy was the predominant primary failed treatment modality, with 31% of patients undergoing primary open surgery. Pre-operatively, three patients were projected to require permanent post-operative dialysis. In the remaining 10 patients, mean pre- and postoperative serum creatinine and eGFR levels were 1.35 mg/dL and 53.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 compared to 1.43 mg/dL and 46.6 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Mean warm ischemia time in 10 patients was 17.4 min and for all patients, the mean blood loss was 647 mL. The predominant pathological stage was pT1a (8/13; 62%). Negative surgical margins were achieved in all cases. The mean follow-up was 32.9 months (3.5-88 months). Conclusion While salvage renal surgery can be challenging, it is feasible and has adequate surgical, functional and oncological outcomes.
id SBU-1_b8ca8bfec2edb5b9421b77fdaa938887
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382015000100147
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Oncological and functional outcomes of salvage renal surgery following failed primary intervention for renal cell carcinomaKidneyGeneral SurgeryCarcinomaRenal CellSalvage Therapy Purpose To assess the oncologic and functional outcomes of salvage renal surgery following failed primary intervention for RCC. Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery for suspected RCC during 2004-2012. We identified 839 patients, 13 of whom required salvage renal surgery. Demographic data was collected for all patients. Intraoperative and postoperative data included ischemic duration, blood loss and perioperative complications. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included abdominal CT or magnetic resonance imaging, chest CT and routine laboratory work. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. Results The majority (85%) of the patients were male, with an average age of 64 years. Ten patients underwent salvage partial nephrectomy while 3 underwent salvage radical nephrectomy. Cryotherapy was the predominant primary failed treatment modality, with 31% of patients undergoing primary open surgery. Pre-operatively, three patients were projected to require permanent post-operative dialysis. In the remaining 10 patients, mean pre- and postoperative serum creatinine and eGFR levels were 1.35 mg/dL and 53.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 compared to 1.43 mg/dL and 46.6 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Mean warm ischemia time in 10 patients was 17.4 min and for all patients, the mean blood loss was 647 mL. The predominant pathological stage was pT1a (8/13; 62%). Negative surgical margins were achieved in all cases. The mean follow-up was 32.9 months (3.5-88 months). Conclusion While salvage renal surgery can be challenging, it is feasible and has adequate surgical, functional and oncological outcomes. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2015-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000100147International braz j urol v.41 n.1 2015reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.20info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbarzua-Cabezas,Fernando G.Sverrisson,EinarCruz,Robert De LaSpiess,Philippe E.Haddock,PeterSexton,Wade J.eng2015-04-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382015000100147Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2015-04-07T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Oncological and functional outcomes of salvage renal surgery following failed primary intervention for renal cell carcinoma
title Oncological and functional outcomes of salvage renal surgery following failed primary intervention for renal cell carcinoma
spellingShingle Oncological and functional outcomes of salvage renal surgery following failed primary intervention for renal cell carcinoma
Abarzua-Cabezas,Fernando G.
Kidney
General Surgery
Carcinoma
Renal Cell
Salvage Therapy
title_short Oncological and functional outcomes of salvage renal surgery following failed primary intervention for renal cell carcinoma
title_full Oncological and functional outcomes of salvage renal surgery following failed primary intervention for renal cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Oncological and functional outcomes of salvage renal surgery following failed primary intervention for renal cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Oncological and functional outcomes of salvage renal surgery following failed primary intervention for renal cell carcinoma
title_sort Oncological and functional outcomes of salvage renal surgery following failed primary intervention for renal cell carcinoma
author Abarzua-Cabezas,Fernando G.
author_facet Abarzua-Cabezas,Fernando G.
Sverrisson,Einar
Cruz,Robert De La
Spiess,Philippe E.
Haddock,Peter
Sexton,Wade J.
author_role author
author2 Sverrisson,Einar
Cruz,Robert De La
Spiess,Philippe E.
Haddock,Peter
Sexton,Wade J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Abarzua-Cabezas,Fernando G.
Sverrisson,Einar
Cruz,Robert De La
Spiess,Philippe E.
Haddock,Peter
Sexton,Wade J.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Kidney
General Surgery
Carcinoma
Renal Cell
Salvage Therapy
topic Kidney
General Surgery
Carcinoma
Renal Cell
Salvage Therapy
description Purpose To assess the oncologic and functional outcomes of salvage renal surgery following failed primary intervention for RCC. Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery for suspected RCC during 2004-2012. We identified 839 patients, 13 of whom required salvage renal surgery. Demographic data was collected for all patients. Intraoperative and postoperative data included ischemic duration, blood loss and perioperative complications. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included abdominal CT or magnetic resonance imaging, chest CT and routine laboratory work. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. Results The majority (85%) of the patients were male, with an average age of 64 years. Ten patients underwent salvage partial nephrectomy while 3 underwent salvage radical nephrectomy. Cryotherapy was the predominant primary failed treatment modality, with 31% of patients undergoing primary open surgery. Pre-operatively, three patients were projected to require permanent post-operative dialysis. In the remaining 10 patients, mean pre- and postoperative serum creatinine and eGFR levels were 1.35 mg/dL and 53.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 compared to 1.43 mg/dL and 46.6 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Mean warm ischemia time in 10 patients was 17.4 min and for all patients, the mean blood loss was 647 mL. The predominant pathological stage was pT1a (8/13; 62%). Negative surgical margins were achieved in all cases. The mean follow-up was 32.9 months (3.5-88 months). Conclusion While salvage renal surgery can be challenging, it is feasible and has adequate surgical, functional and oncological outcomes.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000100147
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000100147
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.20
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.41 n.1 2015
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318074082361344