Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Altunkol,Adem
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Abat,Deniz, Sener,Nevzat Can, Gulum,Mehmet, Ciftci,Halil, Savas,Murat, Yeni,Ercan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000500987
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To compare standard urotherapy with a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback sessions and to determine the changes that these therapies promote in children with dysfunctional voiding. Patients and Methods: The data of 45 patients who participated in the study from January 2010 to March 2013 were evaluated. All patients underwent urinary system ultrasonography to determine post-void residual urine volumes and urinary system anomalies. All patients were diagnosed using uroflowmetry - electromyography (EMG). The flow pattern, maximum flow rate, and urethral sphincter activity were evaluated in all patients using uroflowmetry - EMG. Each patient underwent standard urotherapy, and the results were recorded. Subsequently, biofeedback sessions were added for all patients, and the changes in the results were recorded and statistically compared. Results: A total of forty - five patients were included, of which 34 were female and 11 were male and the average age of the patients was 8.4 ± 2.44 years (range: 5 - 15 years). After the standard urotherapy plus biofeedback sessions, the post-void residual urine volumes, incontinence rates and infection rates of patients were significantly lower than those with the standard urotherapy (p < 0.05). A statistically significant improvement in voiding symptoms was observed after the addition of biofeedback sessions to the standard urotherapy compared with the standard urotherapy alone (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study showed that a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback was more effective in decreasing urinary incontinence rates, infection rates and post - void residual urine volumes in children with dysfunctional voiding than standard urotherapy alone, and it also showed that this combination therapy corrected voiding patterns significantly and objectively.
id SBU-1_c29dbbe0c17c7efee9e9463a39b0c574
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382018000500987
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?BiofeedbackPsychologyChildUrinary Tract InfectionsABSTRACT Objective: To compare standard urotherapy with a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback sessions and to determine the changes that these therapies promote in children with dysfunctional voiding. Patients and Methods: The data of 45 patients who participated in the study from January 2010 to March 2013 were evaluated. All patients underwent urinary system ultrasonography to determine post-void residual urine volumes and urinary system anomalies. All patients were diagnosed using uroflowmetry - electromyography (EMG). The flow pattern, maximum flow rate, and urethral sphincter activity were evaluated in all patients using uroflowmetry - EMG. Each patient underwent standard urotherapy, and the results were recorded. Subsequently, biofeedback sessions were added for all patients, and the changes in the results were recorded and statistically compared. Results: A total of forty - five patients were included, of which 34 were female and 11 were male and the average age of the patients was 8.4 ± 2.44 years (range: 5 - 15 years). After the standard urotherapy plus biofeedback sessions, the post-void residual urine volumes, incontinence rates and infection rates of patients were significantly lower than those with the standard urotherapy (p < 0.05). A statistically significant improvement in voiding symptoms was observed after the addition of biofeedback sessions to the standard urotherapy compared with the standard urotherapy alone (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study showed that a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback was more effective in decreasing urinary incontinence rates, infection rates and post - void residual urine volumes in children with dysfunctional voiding than standard urotherapy alone, and it also showed that this combination therapy corrected voiding patterns significantly and objectively.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2018-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000500987International braz j urol v.44 n.5 2018reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0194info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAltunkol,AdemAbat,DenizSener,Nevzat CanGulum,MehmetCiftci,HalilSavas,MuratYeni,Ercaneng2018-10-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382018000500987Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2018-10-24T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?
title Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?
spellingShingle Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?
Altunkol,Adem
Biofeedback
Psychology
Child
Urinary Tract Infections
title_short Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?
title_full Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?
title_fullStr Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?
title_full_unstemmed Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?
title_sort Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?
author Altunkol,Adem
author_facet Altunkol,Adem
Abat,Deniz
Sener,Nevzat Can
Gulum,Mehmet
Ciftci,Halil
Savas,Murat
Yeni,Ercan
author_role author
author2 Abat,Deniz
Sener,Nevzat Can
Gulum,Mehmet
Ciftci,Halil
Savas,Murat
Yeni,Ercan
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Altunkol,Adem
Abat,Deniz
Sener,Nevzat Can
Gulum,Mehmet
Ciftci,Halil
Savas,Murat
Yeni,Ercan
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biofeedback
Psychology
Child
Urinary Tract Infections
topic Biofeedback
Psychology
Child
Urinary Tract Infections
description ABSTRACT Objective: To compare standard urotherapy with a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback sessions and to determine the changes that these therapies promote in children with dysfunctional voiding. Patients and Methods: The data of 45 patients who participated in the study from January 2010 to March 2013 were evaluated. All patients underwent urinary system ultrasonography to determine post-void residual urine volumes and urinary system anomalies. All patients were diagnosed using uroflowmetry - electromyography (EMG). The flow pattern, maximum flow rate, and urethral sphincter activity were evaluated in all patients using uroflowmetry - EMG. Each patient underwent standard urotherapy, and the results were recorded. Subsequently, biofeedback sessions were added for all patients, and the changes in the results were recorded and statistically compared. Results: A total of forty - five patients were included, of which 34 were female and 11 were male and the average age of the patients was 8.4 ± 2.44 years (range: 5 - 15 years). After the standard urotherapy plus biofeedback sessions, the post-void residual urine volumes, incontinence rates and infection rates of patients were significantly lower than those with the standard urotherapy (p < 0.05). A statistically significant improvement in voiding symptoms was observed after the addition of biofeedback sessions to the standard urotherapy compared with the standard urotherapy alone (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study showed that a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback was more effective in decreasing urinary incontinence rates, infection rates and post - void residual urine volumes in children with dysfunctional voiding than standard urotherapy alone, and it also showed that this combination therapy corrected voiding patterns significantly and objectively.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000500987
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000500987
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0194
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.44 n.5 2018
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318076342042624