Intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and leguminous plants: productivity, quality and composition of silages

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa,Patrícia Monteiro
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Villela,Severino Delmar Junqueira, Leonel,Fernando de Paula, Araújo,Saulo Alberto do Carmo, Araújo,Karoline Guedes, Ruas,José Reinaldo Mendes, Coelho,Felipe Soares, Andrade,Vinícius Raimundi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012001000002
Resumo: The present study was carried out with the objective to evaluate the productive and qualitative characteristics of forages produced in systems of intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and different leguminous plants. Productivity, bromatological composition and the fermentative profile of the silages from the following treatments were evaluated: corn in exclusive cultivation (CEC); intercropping of corn with brachiaria grass (CB); intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and Calopogonium mucunoides (CBCal); intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and Macrotyloma axillare (CBMac); and intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and Stylozanthes capitata (CBSty). The experimental design utilized was completely randomized. For each type of cultivation, five plots or replications of three linear meters were harvested, and the material was separated. The variables assessed were: dry matter productivity per area; dry matter productivity of corn per area; crude protein production per area and productivity of total digestible nutrients per area. The material originated from the cultures was ensiled, with dry matter between 28 and 32%. After, the material was placed and compacted appropriately in bucket silos. A sample was collected from each replication for determination of the contents of DM, crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), lignin, neutral and acid detergent fibers (NDF and ADF) and TDN. A fraction of the sample of silages from each treatment was compressed for extraction of the juice and determination of the silage quality. There was difference between the forms of cultivation for the dry matter production per hectare. The CEC with production of 11920.1 kg DM/ha did not differ from CB (8997.41 kg DM/ha) or CBCal (10452.10 kg DM/ha); however, it was superior to CBMac (8429.75 kg DM/ha) and to CBSty (8164.83 kg DM/ha). The contents of DM, CP, NDF, ADF, lignin and TDN did not differ between the silages from the different treatments. All the silages presented good quality with good fermentation patterns.
id SBZ-1_440fc08b8dbf4593aec2d586496f0566
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-35982012001000002
network_acronym_str SBZ-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and leguminous plants: productivity, quality and composition of silagesagriculturecultivation systemrecovery of degraded pasturesThe present study was carried out with the objective to evaluate the productive and qualitative characteristics of forages produced in systems of intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and different leguminous plants. Productivity, bromatological composition and the fermentative profile of the silages from the following treatments were evaluated: corn in exclusive cultivation (CEC); intercropping of corn with brachiaria grass (CB); intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and Calopogonium mucunoides (CBCal); intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and Macrotyloma axillare (CBMac); and intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and Stylozanthes capitata (CBSty). The experimental design utilized was completely randomized. For each type of cultivation, five plots or replications of three linear meters were harvested, and the material was separated. The variables assessed were: dry matter productivity per area; dry matter productivity of corn per area; crude protein production per area and productivity of total digestible nutrients per area. The material originated from the cultures was ensiled, with dry matter between 28 and 32%. After, the material was placed and compacted appropriately in bucket silos. A sample was collected from each replication for determination of the contents of DM, crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), lignin, neutral and acid detergent fibers (NDF and ADF) and TDN. A fraction of the sample of silages from each treatment was compressed for extraction of the juice and determination of the silage quality. There was difference between the forms of cultivation for the dry matter production per hectare. The CEC with production of 11920.1 kg DM/ha did not differ from CB (8997.41 kg DM/ha) or CBCal (10452.10 kg DM/ha); however, it was superior to CBMac (8429.75 kg DM/ha) and to CBSty (8164.83 kg DM/ha). The contents of DM, CP, NDF, ADF, lignin and TDN did not differ between the silages from the different treatments. All the silages presented good quality with good fermentation patterns.Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia2012-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012001000002Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.41 n.10 2012reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.1590/S1516-35982012001000002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta,Patrícia MonteiroVillela,Severino Delmar JunqueiraLeonel,Fernando de PaulaAraújo,Saulo Alberto do CarmoAraújo,Karoline GuedesRuas,José Reinaldo MendesCoelho,Felipe SoaresAndrade,Vinícius Raimundieng2012-11-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-35982012001000002Revistahttps://www.rbz.org.br/pt-br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br1806-92901516-3598opendoar:2012-11-20T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and leguminous plants: productivity, quality and composition of silages
title Intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and leguminous plants: productivity, quality and composition of silages
spellingShingle Intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and leguminous plants: productivity, quality and composition of silages
Costa,Patrícia Monteiro
agriculture
cultivation system
recovery of degraded pastures
title_short Intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and leguminous plants: productivity, quality and composition of silages
title_full Intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and leguminous plants: productivity, quality and composition of silages
title_fullStr Intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and leguminous plants: productivity, quality and composition of silages
title_full_unstemmed Intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and leguminous plants: productivity, quality and composition of silages
title_sort Intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and leguminous plants: productivity, quality and composition of silages
author Costa,Patrícia Monteiro
author_facet Costa,Patrícia Monteiro
Villela,Severino Delmar Junqueira
Leonel,Fernando de Paula
Araújo,Saulo Alberto do Carmo
Araújo,Karoline Guedes
Ruas,José Reinaldo Mendes
Coelho,Felipe Soares
Andrade,Vinícius Raimundi
author_role author
author2 Villela,Severino Delmar Junqueira
Leonel,Fernando de Paula
Araújo,Saulo Alberto do Carmo
Araújo,Karoline Guedes
Ruas,José Reinaldo Mendes
Coelho,Felipe Soares
Andrade,Vinícius Raimundi
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa,Patrícia Monteiro
Villela,Severino Delmar Junqueira
Leonel,Fernando de Paula
Araújo,Saulo Alberto do Carmo
Araújo,Karoline Guedes
Ruas,José Reinaldo Mendes
Coelho,Felipe Soares
Andrade,Vinícius Raimundi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv agriculture
cultivation system
recovery of degraded pastures
topic agriculture
cultivation system
recovery of degraded pastures
description The present study was carried out with the objective to evaluate the productive and qualitative characteristics of forages produced in systems of intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and different leguminous plants. Productivity, bromatological composition and the fermentative profile of the silages from the following treatments were evaluated: corn in exclusive cultivation (CEC); intercropping of corn with brachiaria grass (CB); intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and Calopogonium mucunoides (CBCal); intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and Macrotyloma axillare (CBMac); and intercropping of corn, brachiaria grass and Stylozanthes capitata (CBSty). The experimental design utilized was completely randomized. For each type of cultivation, five plots or replications of three linear meters were harvested, and the material was separated. The variables assessed were: dry matter productivity per area; dry matter productivity of corn per area; crude protein production per area and productivity of total digestible nutrients per area. The material originated from the cultures was ensiled, with dry matter between 28 and 32%. After, the material was placed and compacted appropriately in bucket silos. A sample was collected from each replication for determination of the contents of DM, crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), lignin, neutral and acid detergent fibers (NDF and ADF) and TDN. A fraction of the sample of silages from each treatment was compressed for extraction of the juice and determination of the silage quality. There was difference between the forms of cultivation for the dry matter production per hectare. The CEC with production of 11920.1 kg DM/ha did not differ from CB (8997.41 kg DM/ha) or CBCal (10452.10 kg DM/ha); however, it was superior to CBMac (8429.75 kg DM/ha) and to CBSty (8164.83 kg DM/ha). The contents of DM, CP, NDF, ADF, lignin and TDN did not differ between the silages from the different treatments. All the silages presented good quality with good fermentation patterns.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012001000002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982012001000002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-35982012001000002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.41 n.10 2012
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron:SBZ
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron_str SBZ
institution SBZ
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br
_version_ 1750318150118801408